E3 · cycle-001.e3-gbr-mirror-peer

Simulations

All 100 simulations of United Kingdom, mirror a peer, 20 years, one per seed, at 2046. The representative simulations link to their own pages, told round by round.

Model 0.1.0 · graph 0.2.0 · parameters 0.1.0 · The experiment

Every simulation

One row per seed, at the horizon. Select a heading to sort.

Simulation	Index	Change	Rank	Tier rank	Tier 1	Shocks	Upsides	Most funded group
20	18.12	+1.67	1	2	7	1	4	Nuclear Deterrence (9 per cent)
26	17.98	+1.52	2	2	7	2	3	Nuclear Deterrence (7 per cent)
91	17.94	+1.48	2	2	6	1	2	Nuclear Deterrence (11 per cent)
78	17.89	+1.44	2	2	6	1	2	Nuclear Deterrence (10 per cent)
25	17.86	+1.40	2	2	6	0	2	Nuclear Deterrence (10 per cent)
23	17.85	+1.40	2	3	5	1	2	Nuclear Deterrence (12 per cent)
81	17.83	+1.38	2	2	6	0	2	Nuclear Deterrence (9 per cent)
48	17.79	+1.34	2	2	6	3	3	Nuclear Deterrence (12 per cent)
27	17.75	+1.30	2	2	6	0	3	Nuclear Deterrence (9 per cent)
68	17.75	+1.29	2	2	6	1	3	Nuclear Deterrence (7 per cent)
60A good simulation (90th percentile)	17.75	+1.29	2	3	5	1	3	Nuclear Deterrence (9 per cent)
69	17.74	+1.29	2	3	5	1	2	Nuclear Deterrence (10 per cent)
94	17.74	+1.29	2	3	4	1	2	Nuclear Deterrence (8 per cent)
4	17.74	+1.29	2	3	5	1	3	Nuclear Deterrence (9 per cent)
71	17.73	+1.28	2	3	5	2	4	Nuclear Deterrence (10 per cent)
5	17.73	+1.28	2	3	5	2	4	Nuclear Deterrence (7 per cent)
82	17.69	+1.24	2	3	5	1	3	Nuclear Deterrence (9 per cent)
22	17.68	+1.23	2	3	4	2	3	Nuclear Deterrence (9 per cent)
19	17.67	+1.22	2	3	4	0	2	Nuclear Deterrence (10 per cent)
39	17.65	+1.20	2	3	4	1	3	Nuclear Deterrence (6 per cent)

Showing 1–20 of 100 simulations · page 1 of 5