E3 · cycle-001.e3-kor-mirror-peer

Simulations

All 100 simulations of South Korea, mirror a peer, 20 years, one per seed, at 2046. The representative simulations link to their own pages, told round by round.

Model 0.1.0 · graph 0.2.0 · parameters 0.1.0 · The experiment

Every simulation

One row per seed, at the horizon. Select a heading to sort.

Simulation	Index	Change	Rank	Tier rank	Tier 1	Shocks	Upsides	Most funded group
20	17.86	+1.86	2	2	6	1	4	Nuclear Deterrence (34 per cent)
27	17.85	+1.85	2	2	7	0	3	Nuclear Deterrence (25 per cent)
60	17.82	+1.82	2	2	7	1	3	Nuclear Deterrence (24 per cent)
23	17.81	+1.80	2	2	6	1	2	Nuclear Deterrence (27 per cent)
26	17.80	+1.80	2	2	6	2	3	Nuclear Deterrence (21 per cent)
71	17.73	+1.73	2	2	7	2	4	Nuclear Deterrence (34 per cent)
25	17.68	+1.68	2	2	6	1	2	Nuclear Deterrence (27 per cent)
81	17.67	+1.67	2	2	7	0	2	Nuclear Deterrence (26 per cent)
3	17.66	+1.65	2	2	7	1	2	Nuclear Deterrence (28 per cent)
4	17.65	+1.65	2	2	6	1	3	Nuclear Deterrence (24 per cent)
69A good simulation (90th percentile)	17.64	+1.64	2	2	7	1	2	Nuclear Deterrence (28 per cent)
48	17.61	+1.61	2	2	6	3	3	Nuclear Deterrence (20 per cent)
68	17.60	+1.60	2	2	6	2	3	Nuclear Deterrence (24 per cent)
19	17.60	+1.60	2	2	6	0	2	Nuclear Deterrence (24 per cent)
91	17.60	+1.59	2	2	6	1	2	Nuclear Deterrence (27 per cent)
39	17.57	+1.56	2	2	6	1	3	Nuclear Deterrence (26 per cent)
17	17.56	+1.56	2	2	6	2	2	Nuclear Deterrence (25 per cent)
5	17.55	+1.55	2	3	5	2	4	Nuclear Deterrence (25 per cent)
94	17.55	+1.55	2	2	6	1	2	Nuclear Deterrence (29 per cent)
78	17.52	+1.52	2	2	7	1	2	Nuclear Deterrence (21 per cent)

Showing 1–20 of 100 simulations · page 1 of 5