Round 23 · simulation 11 · cycle-002.e4-chn

Round 2019

Round 23 of 30 in simulation 11 of China, scripted, 30 years from 1996: 0 actions, and the index −0.204 to 6.91.

Model 0.1.0 · graph 0.2.0 · parameters 0.1.0

State in and state out

The simulation as it came into 2019 (the end of 2018) and as it left it.

Capability index: 6.91 (−0.204); In: 7.12
Rank by index: 82; In: 80
Domains at Tier 1: 0; In: 0
Credits carried: 0; In: 0

Each domain's mean score and tier coming in and going out
Domain	In	Out	Change	Tier
Critical Technology	5.06	4.78	−0.277	6
Strategic Infrastructure	8.74	8.61	−0.131	6
National Security	7.52	7.37	−0.151	5
Human Capital	7.72	7.63	−0.087	12
Information & Influence	7.37	7.12	−0.247	10
Governance & Integrity	7.20	7.08	−0.119	14
Financial Strength	5.46	5.23	−0.236	20 → 21
Production & Innovation	6.88	6.66	−0.225	14 → 16
Trade & Investment	8.07	7.71	−0.359	10

Decision, shocks and propagation

What happened in 2019: the credits, the scripted method's decision and its actions, any shocks and upside events, the tier changes, and the groups that moved most, split into what was invested, lost to decay, struck by events and carried through the dependency graph.

Credits. Income 113. Maintenance 113 of the 133 needed, so 15 per cent of every group went unmaintained and decayed. Nothing spent on actions. 0 carried over. 5 actions could not be paid for.

Earlier events still landing: −11.2 points this round.

Tiers. Financial Strength Tier 20 to 21; Production & Innovation Tier 14 to 16.

The groups that moved most in 2019, and what moved them
Moved most	Change	Decay	Events	Graph
Global Value Chain Position	−0.47	−0.05	−0.40	−0.01
Economic Leverage & Dependence	−0.45	−0.03	−0.40	−0.01
Semiconductors & Advanced Computing	−0.44	−0.04	−0.41	+0.01
Export Capability & Sophistication	−0.44	−0.05	−0.38	−0.01
Trade Policy & Market Access	−0.42	−0.07	−0.34	−0.01
Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks	−0.40	−0.06	−0.33	−0.01