Round 23 · simulation 29 · cycle-002.e4-chn

Round 2019

Round 23 of 30 in simulation 29 of China, scripted, 30 years from 1996: 0 actions, and the index −0.206 to 6.88.

Model 0.1.0 · graph 0.2.0 · parameters 0.1.0

State in and state out

The simulation as it came into 2019 (the end of 2018) and as it left it.

Capability index
6.88 (−0.206)
In: 7.08
Rank by index
83
In: 80
Domains at Tier 1
0
In: 0
Credits carried
0
In: 0
Each domain's mean score and tier coming in and going out
DomainInOutChangeTier
Critical Technology4.994.71−0.2786 → 7
Strategic Infrastructure8.728.58−0.1336
National Security7.487.32−0.1555
Human Capital7.717.62−0.08812
Information & Influence7.367.11−0.24910
Governance & Integrity7.147.02−0.12114
Financial Strength5.475.23−0.23821
Production & Innovation6.836.61−0.22914 → 16
Trade & Investment8.067.70−0.36310

Decision, shocks and propagation

What happened in 2019: the credits, the scripted method's decision and its actions, any shocks and upside events, the tier changes, and the groups that moved most, split into what was invested, lost to decay, struck by events and carried through the dependency graph.

Credits. Income 111. Maintenance 111 of the 132 needed, so 16 per cent of every group went unmaintained and decayed. Nothing spent on actions. 0 carried over. 5 actions could not be paid for.

Earlier events still landing: −11.2 points this round.

Tiers. Critical Technology Tier 6 to 7; Production & Innovation Tier 14 to 16.

The groups that moved most in 2019, and what moved them
Moved mostChangeInvestedDecayEventsGraph
Global Value Chain Position−0.470.00−0.05−0.40−0.02
Economic Leverage & Dependence−0.450.00−0.03−0.40−0.02
Export Capability & Sophistication−0.440.00−0.05−0.39−0.01
Trade Policy & Market Access−0.430.00−0.08−0.34−0.01
Semiconductors & Advanced Computing−0.420.00−0.03−0.40+0.01
Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks−0.400.00−0.06−0.33−0.01