Simulations
All 30 simulations of India, scripted, 30 years from 1996, one per seed, at 2026. The representative simulations link to their own pages, told round by round.
Model 0.1.0 · graph 0.2.0 · parameters 0.1.0 · The experiment
Every simulation
One row per seed, at the horizon. Select a heading to sort.
Simulation | Index | Change | Rank | Tier rank | Tier 1 | Shocks | Upsides | Most funded group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 5.97 | −2.95 | 96 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 27 | 5.96 | −2.96 | 96 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 26 | 5.95 | −2.97 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 9 | 5.95 | −2.98 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 30A good simulation (90th percentile) | 5.95 | −2.97 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 7 | 5.94 | −2.98 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 11 | 5.94 | −2.98 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 13 | 5.94 | −2.98 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 18 | 5.94 | −2.98 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 5 | 5.94 | −2.98 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 4 | 5.93 | −2.99 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 3 | 5.93 | −2.99 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 22 | 5.93 | −2.99 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 6 | 5.92 | −3.00 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 8 | 5.92 | −3.00 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 10Median simulation | 5.92 | −3.00 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 16 | 5.92 | −3.00 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 23 | 5.92 | −3.00 | 100 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 21 | 5.91 | −3.01 | 101 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 25 | 5.91 | −3.01 | 101 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 1 | 5.91 | −3.01 | 101 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 14 | 5.91 | −3.01 | 101 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 20 | 5.91 | −3.01 | 101 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 24 | 5.91 | −3.01 | 101 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 19 | 5.90 | −3.02 | 101 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 2 | 5.90 | −3.02 | 101 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 29A poor simulation (10th percentile) | 5.89 | −3.03 | 101 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 12 | 5.89 | −3.03 | 101 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 28 | 5.88 | −3.04 | 101 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |
| 15 | 5.88 | −3.04 | 101 | 49 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Nuclear Deterrence (17 per cent) |