Round 2052
Round 26 of 30 in simulation 1 of South Korea, hold, 30 years: 0 actions, and the index −0.206 to 6.97.
Model 0.1.0 · graph 0.2.0 · parameters 0.1.0
State in and state out
The simulation as it came into 2052 (the end of 2051) and as it left it.
- Capability index
- 6.97 (−0.206)
- In: 7.17
- Rank by index
- 81
- In: 79
- Domains at Tier 1
- 0
- In: 0
- Credits carried
- 0
- In: 0
| Domain | In | Out | Change | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Technology | 3.16 | 2.96 | −0.199 | 10 |
| Strategic Infrastructure | 7.67 | 7.45 | −0.226 | 7 |
| National Security | 3.95 | 3.75 | −0.197 | 5 → 6 |
| Human Capital | 10.58 | 10.40 | −0.186 | 9 |
| Information & Influence | 5.73 | 5.51 | −0.224 | 11 |
| Governance & Integrity | 12.01 | 11.88 | −0.132 | 9 |
| Financial Strength | 8.65 | 8.44 | −0.211 | 18 |
| Production & Innovation | 6.40 | 6.16 | −0.240 | 15 |
| Trade & Investment | 6.41 | 6.17 | −0.240 | 14 → 15 |
Decision, shocks and propagation
What happened in 2052: the credits, the hold method's decision and its actions, any shocks and upside events, the tier changes, and the groups that moved most, split into what was invested, lost to decay, struck by events and carried through the dependency graph.
Credits. Income 0. Maintenance 0 of the 103 needed, so 100 per cent of every group went unmaintained and decayed. Nothing spent on actions. 0 carried over.
Tiers. National Security Tier 5 to 6; Trade & Investment Tier 14 to 15.
| Moved most | Change | Invested | Decay | Events | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology Adoption & Diffusion | −0.26 | 0.00 | −0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Innovation & Commercialisation | −0.26 | 0.00 | −0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Communications & Digital Infrastructure | −0.26 | 0.00 | −0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Advanced Manufacturing | −0.25 | 0.00 | −0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Trade Facilitation & Logistics | −0.25 | 0.00 | −0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Global Value Chain Position | −0.25 | 0.00 | −0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |