Likelihood, two years
2Unlikely
to end-2028
Likelihood, ten years
3Possible
to end-2036
Systemic impact
1Limited
global
National impact
4Severe
typical highly exposed nation
Onset pace
Days
Duration (acute phase)
30 days (acute phase)
Warning time
Days (none for the earthquake variant)
Scope
National
Recovery horizon
Years (two-year reconstruction)
Capability load
Hard 1/3Soft 2/3Economic 2/3
domains loaded High
Concurrency
Standalone
triggers 4 · triggered by 2
Confidence · movement
medium
new

Rated at Standard Severe. Event reach: single-nation event (The probability that a given nation experiences the Standard Severe event in its principal economic concentration. Risk is clustered in nations with one dominant city on a hazard-exposed site.). Source of scores: model-panel-v0.5.

03Narrative

Dateline: November 2031

The cyclone made landfall on 14 September 2029, forty kilometres from the capital, at the top of a spring tide. Forecasters had given four days' notice and the evacuation order was issued 36 hours before landfall. About 60 per cent of those ordered to leave did so. The river embankments on the eastern side of the city, last strengthened four decades earlier, were overtopped in three places during the night.

By the morning of 15 September, water stood in districts that held a tenth of the national population and produced close to a third of national output. The container port closed. The two main rail approaches and the airport access road were cut. Four of the nine water treatment works lost power or were contaminated, and supply to the metropolitan area fell to 40 per cent of normal. Three of the region's largest hospitals evacuated their patients. The others worked on generators, with fuel delivered by the army. Mobile coverage in the flooded districts failed within twelve hours as the batteries at base stations ran down.

The acute phase lasted a month. For those 30 days, port throughput, piped water and hospital capacity in the capital region stayed below half their normal levels. The central government ran the response from a secondary site because its own operations centre was inside the flood zone. Payment of emergency grants began in the third week, once the civil registry had been restored from a copy held in another city. Households without bank accounts or identity documents waited longer.

The assessment published in December 2029 put direct damage at 8 per cent of annual GDP. Insurers and the national catastrophe pool covered 38 per cent of the loss. The rest fell on households, small firms, the municipality and the central budget. The government drew its contingent credit line in the first week and its catastrophe bond paid out in November. Together these met less than a fifth of the public reconstruction bill. The remainder was financed by a supplementary budget, reallocated capital spending and new borrowing at a wider spread.

Output in the quarter after landfall was 5 per cent lower than a year earlier. Exporters that depended on the port lost contracts to suppliers in neighbouring countries and some did not regain them. About 300,000 people were still in temporary housing six months later. Two insurers withdrew flood cover from the low-lying districts in 2030 and mortgage lending there slowed.

Reconstruction was declared complete in September 2031, two years after landfall. The embankments were rebuilt to a higher standard and the operations centre was moved. The parliamentary inquiry found that the forecast and the warning had worked. It attributed the scale of the loss to three conditions that had been known beforehand: the state of the eastern defences, the siting of critical facilities inside the flood zone and the absence of finance arranged before the event.

The dateline is illustrative, not a forecast. The narrative is hypothetical; the historical anchors below are real events.

04Summary

A flood, storm, fire, heat emergency or earthquake strikes the nation's principal economic concentration. The hazard is the one most relevant to that nation, calibrated to a common consequence: 10 per cent of the population affected and direct damage equal to 8 per cent of annual GDP. Key transport, water and health assets in the core operate below half capacity for 30 days. Reconstruction takes two years and insurance covers less than half the loss. The scenario does not impose an identical physical hazard on every nation. It tests evacuation, continuity of essential services and recovery finance. It is the only natural-hazard test among the twenty.

05Historical anchors

EventDateWhat happenedCalibrates
Türkiye–Syria earthquake6 February 2023Two earthquakes of magnitude 7.8 and 7.5 struck southern Türkiye and northern Syria on the same day. More than 50,000 people died in Türkiye and several thousand in Syria. Eleven Turkish provinces were affected. The World Bank estimated direct physical damage in Türkiye at US$34.2 billion, equivalent to 4 per cent of 2021 GDP.A large middle-income economy absorbed damage at half this scenario's threshold, in provinces that were not its economic core. It sets the scale at which building-code enforcement, emergency housing and the fiscal response decide the outcome.
Thailand floodsJuly 2011 to January 2012Flooding along the Chao Phraya basin affected 65 of 77 provinces and inundated seven industrial estates north of Bangkok. More than 800 people died. The World Bank estimated damage and losses at about US$46 billion, most of it in manufacturing. Production of vehicles and hard disk drives was interrupted for months and manufacturers in other countries lost supply.The closest recorded case of a natural hazard reaching a nation's industrial core. It calibrates the loss as a share of GDP, the industry and supply channel and the limited, short-lived effect outside the country.
Great Hanshin (Kobe) earthquake17 January 1995An earthquake beneath the Kobe area killed more than 6,400 people and destroyed elevated expressways, rail lines and most berths at the port. Damage was put at about US$100 billion, around 2 per cent of Japan's GDP at the time, and only a small share was insured. The port of Kobe, then among the world's busiest container ports, took about two years to restore and did not recover its former rank.The two-year reconstruction period and the permanent loss of trade from a damaged hub. It also shows that a high-income nation with strong institutions can carry a low insured share.
Pakistan floodsJune to October 2022Monsoon flooding affected about 33 million people and killed more than 1,700. The government-led post-disaster needs assessment put damage at US$14.9 billion, economic losses at US$15.2 billion and reconstruction needs at US$16.3 billion.A flood at national scale in a lower-income state with little insurance and limited fiscal space. Reconstruction depended on external pledges, which is the 'partial' external support setting.
Los Angeles wildfiresJanuary 2025The Palisades and Eaton fires destroyed more than 16,000 structures and killed about 30 people. Insured losses were estimated at around US$40 billion, the costliest wildfire event on record for insurers. Several insurers had reduced cover in the affected areas before the fires.The fire variant in a high-income core. It marks the upper end of the insured share and shows how the retreat of private cover moves the cost of rebuilding to households and public pools.
Valencia floods29 October 2024Extreme rainfall caused flash floods in the Valencia region of Spain. More than 220 people died. The regional alert to mobile phones was sent after flooding had already begun in several towns.Warning time available is not warning received. A high-income state with accurate forecasts lost lives through late alerting, which the evacuation test must capture.

06Parameters

Shown at their preset values. Parameters are not adjustable in this release and nothing on this page is computed from them. Custom settings run (Phase B) but are labelled 'non-standard run' and excluded from comparisons.

Common variables at Standard Severe · read-only

1. Severity
  • major
  • severe (Standard Severe)
  • extreme
2. Duration (acute phase)
  • 30 days (Standard Severe)
  • 90 days
  • 1 year
  • 3 years
  • 5 years
3. Onset pace
  • days (Standard Severe)
  • weeks
  • months
  • years
4. Warning time
  • none
  • days (Standard Severe)
  • months

Standard Severe: days (none for the earthquake variant)

5. Scope
  • national (Standard Severe)
  • regional
  • global
6. Origin
  • natural (Standard Severe)
  • accidental
  • adversarial (great power / neighbour / non-state)
  • negotiated
7. External support
  • full
  • partial (Standard Severe)
  • none
8. Concurrency
  • standalone (Standard Severe)
  • plus one named scenario
  • plus two
9. Policy response assumed
  • none (pure exposure)
  • current plans executed (Standard Severe)
  • best practice
10. Recovery horizon
  • months
  • years (Standard Severe)
  • structural

Scenario-specific parameters · read-only

ParameterDefaultRange or optionsNote
Hazard typethe hazard most relevant to the nation's coreflood, storm, fire, heat emergency or earthquakeChosen nation by nation. The consequence, not the physical intensity, is held constant.
Share of population affected105 to 25Evacuated, displaced, injured or without essential services during the acute phase.
Direct damage84 to 20Physical damage to buildings, infrastructure and stock. Output losses are additional.
Capacity of key assets in the corebelow 5025 to 75Applies to transport, water and health assets for the whole of the acute phase.
Acute phase3014 to 90The period during which key assets remain below the capacity setting.
Reconstruction period21 to 5Time to restore damaged assets. Lower-income nations may warrant the upper end.
Insured share of the loss405 to 49Private insurance and public catastrophe pools together. The specification requires less than half.

07Transmission channels

  1. 1

    The hazard strikes the principal economic concentration, affecting 10 per cent of the population and destroying buildings and infrastructure worth 8 per cent of annual GDP.

  2. 2

    Warning, evacuation and building standards determine deaths and injuries. Where alerts arrive late or people do not act on them, casualties rise sharply.

  3. 3

    Transport, water and health assets in the core operate below half capacity for a month. Power and telecommunications outages slow the response.

  4. 4

    Firms in the core stop work. Ports, airports and logistics hubs close and suppliers and customers elsewhere in the country lose inputs and markets.

  5. 5

    Insurance pays less than half the loss. Households, small firms and municipalities carry the rest or wait for public support.

  6. 6

    The central budget funds relief and reconstruction through reallocation and borrowing. Sovereign spreads widen where fiscal space is thin.

  7. 7

    Displacement, interrupted schooling and deferred health care persist through a two-year reconstruction. Some firms and residents do not return.

  8. 8

    Insurers reprice or withdraw cover in the affected districts and an inquiry assigns responsibility, which shapes public confidence in the authorities.

08Capability loading

High: capability band shifts expected under current plans. Medium: band shifts under 'none' policy response only. Low: strain without band shift. Loads are judgement-based until the Atlas connects. Domains link to the Atlas.

DomainLoadChannel
Hard
Defence and securityMediumArmed forces divert to search and rescue, logistics and engineering; bases and readiness in the core are degraded.
Strategic infrastructureHighTransport, water, power, telecommunications and hospitals in the core run below half capacity for a month.
Critical technologyLowEarly-warning, geospatial and data facilities are strained; sites in the core depend on backup power.
Soft
Government effectivenessHighEvacuation, continuity of government, registration, payments and a two-year reconstruction programme test central and city administration.
Human capitalHighDeaths, injuries, hospital evacuation, displacement, interrupted schooling and loss of skilled workers from the core.
Influence and cohesionMediumConfidence in the authorities depends on the fairness of relief and the findings of the inquiry.
Economic
Macro-financialHighUninsured losses fall on the budget, banks and households; borrowing rises and insurers reprice or withdraw.
Industry, trade and supplyHighOutput stops in the core; port and logistics closures cut exports and break domestic supply chains.
Energy and resourcesMediumGeneration, fuel distribution and water supply in the core are interrupted; repair depends on imported equipment.

09Stakeholders

Government
Relevance 4/5

Exposure

Warning and evacuation systems, continuity-of-government sites, flood defences and building-code enforcement, finance arranged before the event and the capacity of city authorities.

Actions

  • Test evacuation of the core at full scale and publish the compliance rate
  • Arrange contingent credit, catastrophe bonds and reserve funds sized to a loss of 8 per cent of GDP
  • Move operations centres, registries and backup sites outside the mapped hazard zone

Watch

  • Condition surveys of embankments, dams and drainage
  • Insured share of residential and commercial property in the core
  • Seasonal forecasts and seismic hazard updates
Technology
Relevance 3/5

Exposure

Data centres, exchanges, base stations and cable landing points sited in the core, the delivery of alerts and the duration of backup power.

Actions

  • Hold recoverable copies of registries and payment systems in a second region
  • Extend backup power at base stations and exchanges to at least 72 hours
  • Test cell-broadcast alerts against the full population of the core

Watch

  • Hazard maps set against the location of critical sites
  • Results of backup power and fuel resupply tests
  • Recovery time achieved in failover exercises
Investors
Relevance 5/5

Exposure

Property insurers, reinsurers, sovereign and municipal debt, mortgage books, utilities and firms with a single site in the core.

Actions

  • Screen assets and suppliers for location in the core hazard zone
  • Stress sovereign and municipal credit for an uninsured loss of 4 to 5 per cent of GDP
  • Reflect the possible withdrawal of insurance cover in property and mortgage valuations

Watch

  • Reinsurance renewal prices and terms
  • Insurer exits and the growth of public pools by district
  • Sovereign use of contingent credit and catastrophe bonds
Public
Relevance 4/5

Exposure

Households and small firms in the hazard zone, above all those without insurance, savings, bank accounts or identity documents.

Actions

  • Know the evacuation route and the conditions under which to leave
  • Keep water, medicines and copies of documents for 72 hours
  • Check what the household insurance policy covers and excludes

Watch

  • Official alerts and evacuation orders
  • Local hazard maps and the state of defence works
  • Changes in the price and availability of home insurance

10Regional exposure

RegionExposureRationale
North AmericaHighHurricane, wildfire and earthquake exposure meets very high asset values on the Gulf, Atlantic and Pacific coasts; insurers are withdrawing from several markets.
EuropeMediumRiver floods and heat are the main hazards, with seismic risk in the south-east; activity is dispersed and public backstops are strong.
ChinaHighTyphoon, flood and earthquake exposure coincides with the delta city clusters that hold a large share of output and exports.
Indo-PacificHighTyphoons and earthquakes strike capital regions directly; in Pacific island states the core is most of the country.
South AsiaHighMonsoon floods, cyclones, extreme heat and Himalayan seismic risk meet dense cities, low insurance cover and limited fiscal space.
Gulf and Middle EastMediumExtreme heat and flash floods are rising; Türkiye and Iran carry major seismic risk, while Gulf states hold fiscal buffers.
AfricaHighFloods and cyclones strike fast-growing coastal and river cities with thin drainage, low insurance cover and little arranged finance.
Latin America and CaribbeanHighHurricanes, earthquakes and El Niño floods fall on dominant capital cities; Caribbean states can lose more than a year's output.
Russia and EurasiaMediumCentral Asian and Caucasus capitals sit on active faults; Russian activity is dispersed, with wildfire and river floods the main hazards.

11Early-warning indicators

IndicatorSourceThreshold
El Niño and La Niña state and seasonal outlookWMO El Niño/La Niña UpdateEl Niño or La Niña conditions declared for the coming season
River flood forecasts for the core basinGlobal Flood Awareness System (GloFAS), Copernicus Emergency Management Serviceforecast flow above the 20-year return level
Coverage of multi-hazard early warning systemsUNDRR and WMO, Global Status of Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systemsno multi-hazard early warning system reported
Insured share of natural catastrophe lossesSwiss Re Institute, sigmainsured share below 40 per cent of national catastrophe losses
Property catastrophe reinsurance pricingGuy Carpenter Global Property Catastrophe Rate-on-Line Indexrise of more than 20 per cent at the January renewal
Hazard exposure and coping capacity by nationINFORM Risk Index, European Commission Joint Research Centrehazard and exposure score above 6 with lack of coping capacity above 5
Recorded disaster losses relative to GDPEM-DAT, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters—
Seismic hazard at the principal cityGlobal Earthquake Model Foundation, Global Seismic Hazard Map—

12Compounds

Triggers
  • S05 Legitimacy rupture · A relief effort seen as failed or unfair, close to an election or succession, can open a dispute over lawful authority.
  • S06 Breadbasket failure · Only where the core is also a major grain-producing or grain-exporting region; the loss then counts as one of the two failures.
  • S02 Global funding seizure · Only where the core is a global financial centre. Elsewhere the effect is a wider spread for one sovereign.
  • S18 Public service leap · Relief payments after a disaster expose paper delivery and create a mandate to replace it
Triggered by
  • S06 Breadbasket failure · The heat and drought behind the breadbasket failures can produce the heat emergency or fire variant in the same season.
  • S04 Hybrid coercion · A power and telecommunications blackout during extreme heat or cold turns a manageable event into an emergency in the core.
Amplified by
Amplifying trends
Climate change & physical riskUrban population concentrationInfrastructure ageing & maintenance backlogInsurance retreat & insurabilityDisaster risk financeEarly-warning coverageDams, reservoirs & flood defenceLocal & city government capacity

13Rating rationale

RatingBand or levelWhy
Likelihood, two years2UnlikelyDisasters with damage near or above 8 per cent of GDP are recorded a handful of times each decade across 197 nations, mostly in smaller or lower-income states: Haiti 2010, Chile 2010, Thailand 2011 and Nepal 2015 qualify, while the 2023 earthquakes cost Türkiye about 4 per cent. That base rate gives a given nation under 1 per cent in two years. The first-pass rating of band 3 counted any 1-in-100 hazard, not one meeting the damage threshold.
Likelihood, ten years3PossibleThe same base rate over ten years gives a given nation a few per cent, inside band 3. Exposure is rising: people and assets continue to concentrate in coastal, riverine and seismic zones, and warming raises the frequency of extreme rainfall, heat and fire weather. Nations with one dominant city on an exposed site sit above the band; large economies with dispersed activity sit below it.
Systemic impact1LimitedThe event strikes one nation. Even the costliest recorded disasters fall below 0.5 per cent of world output: the Japanese government put direct damage from the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake at about 16.9 trillion yen. Spillovers run through particular supply chains, as with hard disk drives after the 2011 Thailand floods, and fade within about a year. The level would rise only where the core is a global financial or manufacturing hub.
National impact4SevereDirect damage of 8 per cent of GDP, a tenth of the population affected and a month of essential services below half capacity place economic damage and essential services at Severe. The level is not Catastrophic because the state, the currency and most of the territory continue to function and reconstruction completes in two years. Türkiye in 2023 absorbed damage of about 4 per cent of GDP without losing fiscal control; this event is twice that.
ConfidencemediumHazard science and loss records are mature and the panel members who held the scenario gave identical ratings. The step from a common damage threshold to a frequency for each nation is less certain.

Source of scores: model-panel-v0.5. Confidence refers to the rating, not the scenario. Calibration sources are listed with the anchors above and on the scenario methodology page.

14Open questions

Contested assumptions for the panel to resolve.

  • Whether the common calibration should be a damage share of GDP, as specified, or a common return period, given that 8 per cent of GDP implies very different hazard intensities across nations.
  • How to treat small island and city states, where the core is most of the country and direct damage can exceed annual GDP.
  • Whether a heat emergency, whose deaths are diffuse and whose physical damage is small, fits a specification defined by direct damage and asset capacity.
  • Whether a two-year reconstruction period holds for lower-income nations, where recovery from comparable events has taken longer.

15Commentary

No signed commentary in this build.

16Version and citation

Version

0.5.0 · active · core-disaster

Change log
  • 0.5.0 · 9 October 2026 · Rebuilt in the second pass from Catastrophic disaster in the core: the event is now calibrated to a common consequence (10 per cent of the population affected, direct damage of 8 per cent of GDP, key assets below half capacity for a month) instead of a common return period; likelihood and impact each lowered one step; macro-financial and industry loads raised to High.
Full change log

Rating history

One row per edition. Each edition page is frozen at release; corrections are published as errata.

EditionRankL2yL10ySystemicNationalConfidenceEdition view
202792Unlikely3Possible1Limited4SeveremediumOpen

Versions

VersionDateChange
0.5.09 October 2026Rebuilt in the second pass from Catastrophic disaster in the core: the event is now calibrated to a common consequence (10 per cent of the population affected, direct damage of 8 per cent of GDP, key assets below half capacity for a month) instead of a common return period; likelihood and impact each lowered one step; macro-financial and industry loads raised to High.

Citation and downloads

Cite as

GINC (2027). Scenario S07 A major disaster disables the national economic core, Scenario Library v0.5. scenarios.ginc.org/scenarios/core-disaster

Content and data are published under CC BY 4.0.