Likelihood, two years
2Unlikely
to end-2028
Likelihood, ten years
3Possible
to end-2036
Systemic impact
1Limited
global
National impact
4Major
typical highly exposed nation
Onset pace
Months
Duration (acute phase)
3 years (two years to full coverage, then one of contested operation)
Warning time
Months
Scope
National
Recovery horizon
Structural
Capability load
Hard 2/3Soft 3/3Economic 1/3
domains loaded High
Concurrency
Standalone
triggers 5 · triggered by 5
Confidence · movement
medium
new

Rated at Standard Severe. Event reach: single-nation event (The probability is for a given nation. It is clustered among lower-income and middle-income states that already have wide identity coverage and mobile payment use.). Source of scores: model-panel-v0.5. Upside scenario: impact levels measure the scale of change, not loss.

03Narrative

Dateline: April 2031

The switch took place on 1 March 2029. Two months earlier the audit office had published the results of the independent tests. The security review had found no unresolved critical faults. The inclusion trial, run across 40 districts, had shown that 96 per cent of adults could complete a payment and a records request, alone or with an assistant. The law had made both reports a condition of the switch.

By March 2031, 90 per cent of adults had used the identity, payment and data exchange services in the previous quarter. The median time from an approved benefit claim to payment had fallen from 20 days to four. The revenue authority estimated that the tax compliance gap had narrowed by a quarter, mainly because invoices and payments between registered firms were now matched automatically. Every contract above the publication threshold, and every decision on a licence or a benefit, carried a record that the audit office and the applicant could read.

The gains were contested. About 60,000 licensed agents, form writers and payment handlers lost most of their fee income within a year. Their associations brought two court challenges and organised stoppages at district offices. In three provinces, officials who had controlled land and licence files delayed the transfer of records until the audit office published a list of the offices that had not complied. The new records identified a cartel in road maintenance contracts, and 14 officials were charged.

Exclusion was the harder problem. The speech interface performed poorly in two minority languages. Fingerprint authentication failed for older manual workers at four times the national rate. The assisted counters, which the law required in every district, handled 11 per cent of all transactions in the first year and 7 per cent in the second. A proposal in 2030 to close them was withdrawn after the inclusion auditor reported that closure would leave 1.5 million adults without access. The automated eligibility model for housing support was suspended for five months after a review found that it rejected applicants with irregular income at twice the expected rate.

The system failed in service once. An outage of nine hours in August 2029 stopped online authentication. Pharmacies and benefit offices used the offline procedure and payments were reconciled the next day. In 2030 the interior ministry requested bulk access to payment records. The data protection authority refused and the court upheld the refusal.

Two neighbouring states that made a similar switch without published tests reported higher enrolment and lower use. GINC's assessment was that the result depended less on the software than on four conditions: tests before the switch, a staffed offline route, records open to audit and a regulator able to refuse the state.

The dateline is illustrative, not a forecast. The narrative is hypothetical; the historical anchors below are real events.

04Summary

A government switches its principal payments and administrative services to interoperable public digital systems after independent security and inclusion tests. Within two years, 90 per cent of adults can use identity, payments and consent-based data exchange, with assisted offline access retained for every essential service. Median benefit delivery time falls 80 per cent and the tax compliance gap narrows by a quarter. Procurement and service records become auditable. Citizens and compliant small firms gain access and time. Intermediaries and gatekeepers who drew income from the old process lose it and resist, and poorly represented groups risk exclusion. The test is reliable, rights-respecting operation.

Who gains
  • Households that receive benefits, pensions and refunds in days instead of weeks
  • Compliant small firms, which gain time, verified records and access to credit
  • Revenue authorities and audit offices
  • Adults previously without an account or a usable proof of identity
Who loses
  • Agents, brokers and payment handlers whose fee income depended on the old process
  • Officials who drew unofficial payments from control of files, licences and contracts
  • People the digital route fails: some older adults, minority-language speakers and those without a phone
  • Firms and individuals whose under-reported income becomes visible to the revenue authority

A shock most would count as progress. It is not upside for everyone: each record names who gains and who loses. Impact levels measure the scale of change, in either direction, and loads mark the capabilities a nation needs in order to capture the gain or absorb the loss.

05Historical anchors

EventDateWhat happenedCalibrates
Aadhaar2009 onwardIndia's identity authority was set up in 2009, issued its first number in September 2010, passed one billion numbers in April 2016 and has since issued more than 1.3 billion.Identity enrolment at national scale took about six years. The scenario therefore assumes the identity layer largely exists before the two-year switch.
PixNovember 2020Brazil's central bank launched an instant payment system open to all banks and payment firms. Most adults had used it within two years and it became the country's most used payment method.The assumption of 90 per cent coverage in two years on the payment layer, and the loss of transfer fee income by incumbents.
X-Road2001Estonia introduced a data exchange layer through which agencies and firms query each other's registers. Each query is logged and a person can see which bodies have looked at their records.Consent-based data exchange and auditable service records as standing infrastructure, sustained for more than two decades.
Novissi cash transfers2020Togo paid emergency cash transfers to informal workers by mobile money during the pandemic, with registration by phone and payment within days.The fall in benefit delivery time that follows when identity and payment systems are connected, in a low-income state.
Aadhaar exclusion cases2017–2019Researchers and journalists documented denials of subsidised food rations in several Indian states where biometric authentication failed or records had not been linked.Counter-anchor: the exclusion that follows where no assisted or offline route exists, and the reason the scenario requires one.
Huduma Namba court rulingsJanuary 2020 and October 2021Kenya's High Court ruled in January 2020 that the national digital identity programme could proceed only with an adequate data protection framework. In October 2021 it found the card roll-out unlawful for want of a data protection impact assessment.Counter-anchor: a switch made before legal safeguards and independent assessment are in place can be stopped by the courts.

06Parameters

Shown at their preset values. Parameters are not adjustable in this release and nothing on this page is computed from them. Custom settings run (Phase B) but are labelled 'non-standard run' and excluded from comparisons.

Common variables at Standard Severe · read-only

1. Severity
  • major
  • severe (Standard Severe)
  • extreme
2. Duration (acute phase)
  • 30 days
  • 90 days
  • 1 year
  • 3 years (Standard Severe)
  • 5 years
3. Onset pace
  • days
  • weeks
  • months (Standard Severe)
  • years
4. Warning time
  • none
  • days
  • months (Standard Severe)
5. Scope
  • national (Standard Severe)
  • regional
  • global
6. Origin
  • natural
  • accidental
  • adversarial (great power / neighbour / non-state)
  • negotiated (Standard Severe)
7. External support
  • full
  • partial (Standard Severe)
  • none
8. Concurrency
  • standalone (Standard Severe)
  • plus one named scenario
  • plus two
9. Policy response assumed
  • none (pure exposure)
  • current plans executed
  • best practice (Standard Severe)
10. Recovery horizon
  • months
  • years
  • structural (Standard Severe)

Scenario-specific parameters · read-only

ParameterDefaultRange or optionsNote
Adults able to use identity, payments and consent-based data exchange90 per cent75 to 98Measured by successful use within two years of the switch, alone or with assistance, not by enrolment.
Fall in median benefit delivery time80 per cent50 to 95From approved claim to receipt of payment.
Reduction in the tax compliance gap25 per cent10 to 40The gap between tax due and tax collected, as estimated by the revenue authority.
Time from the switch to full coverage2 years1 to 4Assumes identity enrolment is largely complete before the switch.
Independent tests before the switchsecurity and inclusion tests passed and publishedoptions: security test only / unpublished / noneTests are commissioned outside the operating agency.
Assisted offline accessretained for every essential serviceoptions: partial / withdrawn after transitionStaffed counters and an offline procedure for use during outages.
Records open to auditall procurement above the publication threshold and all service decisionsoptions: procurement only / internal audit only—

07Transmission channels

  1. 1

    Independent security and inclusion tests are passed and published, and the government switches its principal payments and administrative services to the public systems.

  2. 2

    Benefits, public salaries, taxes and licences move to the new route, which brings most adults into regular use within months.

  3. 3

    Benefit delivery time falls, and duplicate or fictitious claims are removed as identity and payment records are matched.

  4. 4

    Matched invoices and payments narrow the tax compliance gap, and small firms obtain credit on verified transaction records.

  5. 5

    Procurement and service decisions leave auditable records, which exposes collusion and removes discretion from gatekeepers.

  6. 6

    Displaced intermediaries and officials resist through court challenges, stoppages and delay in transferring records.

  7. 7

    Authentication failures, language gaps and outages fall mainly on poorly represented groups; assisted offline access and redress determine how many are excluded.

  8. 8

    Regulators and courts rule on requests for wider access to personal data, which settles whether public trust in the systems holds.

08Capability loading

High: capability band shifts expected under current plans. Medium: band shifts under 'none' policy response only. Low: strain without band shift. Loads are judgement-based until the Atlas connects. Domains link to the Atlas.

DomainLoadChannel
Hard
Defence and securityLowIdentity records support border and security functions; access by security agencies must be bounded by law
Strategic infrastructureHighIdentity, payment and data exchange systems become essential infrastructure that must run continuously
Critical technologyHighAuthentication, encryption, cyber security and AI case handling must be operated and tested domestically
Soft
Government effectivenessHighService delivery, revenue administration, procurement audit and redress change together
Human capitalHighDigital skills, literacy and language coverage decide who can use the services unaided
Influence and cohesionHighTrust in the state rises or falls with fairness, privacy and the treatment of excluded groups
Economic
Macro-financialHighTax compliance, benefit leakage, payment costs and access to credit all shift
Industry, trade and supplyMediumSmall firms enter formal commerce; payment agents and form-filling intermediaries lose business
Energy and resourcesLowData centres and access points need continuous power and connectivity

09Stakeholders

Government
Relevance 3/5

Exposure

Delivery, revenue and trust improve; outage, exclusion and misuse of data become the state's direct responsibility

Actions

  • Make published independent security and inclusion tests a legal condition of the switch
  • Fund and staff an assisted offline route for every essential service
  • Give the data protection authority and the audit office powers and budget before launch

Watch

  • Active use and authentication failure rates by group and district
  • Benefit delivery time and the tax compliance gap
  • Grievance cases opened and resolved
Technology
Relevance 5/5

Exposure

Operators carry a national platform whose failure stops payments and services

Actions

  • Build on open standards and published interfaces to avoid dependence on one supplier
  • Design for outage, low connectivity and users without smartphones
  • Test language, speech and biometric performance across population groups before release

Watch

  • Uptime of identity, payment and data exchange services
  • Failure rates by language and age group
  • Security test findings and time taken to remedy them
Investors
Relevance 4/5

Exposure

Payment intermediaries and agents lose fee income; lenders gain verified transaction data and the sovereign gains revenue

Actions

  • Review holdings exposed to card, remittance and agency fee income in adopting states
  • Reassess sovereign revenue projections where the compliance gap narrows
  • Price credit to small firms on verified transaction records

Watch

  • Instant payment volumes and fee levels
  • Tax revenue as a share of GDP
  • Court rulings and legislation affecting the platform
Public
Relevance 5/5

Exposure

Faster payments and services for most adults; exclusion for people the digital route fails

Actions

  • Enrol and learn the assisted and redress routes
  • Check the consent record for data shared between agencies
  • Report failed authentication and refused services to the oversight body

Watch

  • Outage notices and offline procedures
  • Closure or staffing of assisted counters
  • Requests by security agencies for access to personal data

10Regional exposure

RegionExposureRationale
North AmericaMediumFederal and state systems are fragmented and private payment networks are entrenched; the gain is real but resistance is strong
EuropeMediumMost services are already digital; the remaining gain is inclusion and interoperability across borders and agencies
ChinaMediumPayments and services are already digital on platform firms and state systems; independent testing and consent are the gap
Indo-PacificHighSouth-East Asian states are linking instant payment systems; archipelagos and Pacific islands gain most from remote access
South AsiaHighIndia supplies the model and much of the open software; neighbours with large benefit programmes have the most to gain
Gulf and Middle EastMediumGulf states have capital and digital government; elsewhere conflict and weak audit limit the gain
AfricaHighThe largest gap between paper delivery and what is possible, with wide mobile money use to build on
Latin America and CaribbeanHighBrazil's instant payment system is the regional reference; large informal sectors raise both the tax gain and the resistance
Russia and EurasiaMediumStates can build the systems quickly; weak independent oversight makes rights-respecting operation the hardest condition to meet

11Early-warning indicators

IndicatorSourceThreshold
Adults with a digital identity that can be used to authenticate onlineWorld Bank ID4D Global Datasetabove 90 per cent of adults
Adults who made or received a digital payment in the past yearWorld Bank Global Findex Databaseabove 80 per cent of adults
Online service provision and e-participation scoresUnited Nations E-Government Survey—
Maturity of core government systems and shared platformsWorld Bank GovTech Maturity Indexentry to the highest maturity group
Tax revenue as a share of GDP and published tax gap estimatesIMF Government Finance Statistics; national revenue authoritiestax gap estimate falling for two consecutive years
Public contracts published as open dataOpen Contracting Partnership; national procurement portals—
Data protection law in force with an independent regulatorUNCTAD Data Protection and Privacy Legislation Worldwidelaw in force before the switch
Authentication failure rate and grievance cases by population group—failure rate for any group more than twice the national rate

12Compounds

Triggers
Triggered by
  • S11 Debt service reset · Fiscal release tied to transparent procurement and credible budgets finances the switch
  • S10 Severe pandemic · Emergency transfers during a pandemic force a state to build delivery systems
  • S07 Core disaster · Relief payments after a disaster expose paper delivery and create a mandate to replace it
  • S12 Market access opening · Digital trade and traceability rules push members to adopt interoperable public digital systems
  • S20 Outbreak defence succeeds · Vaccination registers and consent records demonstrate interoperable public digital systems in use.
An audit finding or benefit payment scandal that discredits paper deliveryA regional payment-link agreement that requires interoperable domestic systems
Amplified by
Amplifying trends
Digital public infrastructurePublic-sector AI adoptionState capacity & deliveryData protection & digital rightsAlgorithmic accountability & biasFinancial inclusionCorruption & state captureDigital language representation gaps

13Rating rationale

RatingBand or levelWhy
Likelihood, two years2UnlikelyThis is the chance that a given nation completes the full Standard Severe switch within two years. Brazil's Pix reached most adults in about two years, but on the payment layer alone. Aadhaar took about six years to pass one billion numbers. Few of the 197 nations have identity, payments and data exchange ready to pass independent tests together. One or two completions in the window is the central expectation, which is the Unlikely band.
Likelihood, ten years3PossibleOver ten years the components are open, low in cost and endorsed: G20 leaders adopted a framework for digital public infrastructure in 2023 and many states are building on open-source platforms. The binding constraints are independent testing, universal assisted access and political tolerance of audit. GINC expects between two and ten nations to meet the full definition in a decade, which is the Possible band.
Systemic impact1LimitedLevel 1. The event occurs in one nation at a time and the gain is administrative: faster transfers, a narrower tax gap and lower transaction costs. Even in a large adopter this is well under 0.5 per cent of global output over five years, and no capability band shifts are expected outside the adopting state. Payment intermediaries lose income locally, not globally.
National impact4MajorLevel 4, reached on essential services. Benefit delivery time falls 80 per cent, the tax compliance gap narrows by a quarter and 90 per cent of adults can deal with the state remotely, so revenue, inclusion and audit change together. It is not level 5 because the change is reversible: outage, exclusion or misuse of the data can undo the gain, and the structure of the economy is unchanged in the first five years.
ConfidencemediumAdoption speeds are well documented for single layers. Evidence on fiscal effects, exclusion rates and the durability of safeguards is thinner and contested.

Source of scores: model-panel-v0.5. Confidence refers to the rating, not the scenario. Calibration sources are listed with the anchors above and on the scenario methodology page.

14Open questions

Contested assumptions for the panel to resolve.

  • Whether a programme that a government chooses belongs in a library of events, and which date marks the point at which it has occurred.
  • Whether 'can use' should be measured by enrolment, by successful use or by an independent survey, since the three give different coverage figures.
  • Whether a 25 per cent reduction in the tax compliance gap is achievable within two years, given that the evidence outside value added tax is thin.
  • How the national impact level should treat a state in which delivery improves and rights protections weaken at the same time.

15Commentary

No signed commentary in this build.

16Version and citation

Version

0.5.0 · active · public-service-leap

Change log
  • 0.5.0 · 9 October 2026 · Rebuilt in the second pass from Digital public infrastructure leapfrog: the event is now a tested switch to inclusive operation within two years, with likelihood lowered, onset set to months and resistance from displaced intermediaries added.
Full change log

Rating history

One row per edition. Each edition page is frozen at release; corrections are published as errata.

EditionRankL2yL10ySystemicNationalConfidenceEdition view
2027Not ranked2Unlikely3Possible1Limited4MajormediumOpen

Versions

VersionDateChange
0.5.09 October 2026Rebuilt in the second pass from Digital public infrastructure leapfrog: the event is now a tested switch to inclusive operation within two years, with likelihood lowered, onset set to months and resistance from displaced intermediaries added.

Citation and downloads

Cite as

GINC (2027). Scenario S18 A public service platform reaches inclusive operation, Scenario Library v0.5. scenarios.ginc.org/scenarios/public-service-leap

Content and data are published under CC BY 4.0.