Africa · AGO

Angola

Baseline index 4.60Rank 129 of 197NascentAfricaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fuel-dependent. Budgets built on oil, gas and commodities: two of the upside scenarios are their downside. One of 15 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
27.8
rank 78 of 197 · 3 years: 27.7
Worst case
−20.1%
Legitimacy rupture · tail −18.3%
Opportunity · 10 years
−21.2
rank 180 of 197 · 3 years: −21.4
Best case
+8
Water-efficient food leap · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
19%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.26
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
9of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Breadbasket failure, Trade bloc rupture, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; share of population aged under 15; industry as a share of gdp; low life expectancy at birth; consumer price inflation; youth unemployment rate; staple foods among the top five imports; public debt relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Angola’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.90−0.92−1.14−0.50▼ 219Information Environment & Strategic Communication 1.8 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06High 0.71−0.87−1.11−0.49▼ 518Population Health 2.7 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.59−0.73−0.88−0.40▲ 315Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.61−0.69−0.85−0.39▼ 115Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.66−0.64−0.81−0.36▲ 211Labour & Employment 3.2 · Nascent
Core disaster S07Medium 0.54−0.59−0.75−0.33013National Resilience & Crisis Management 3.9 · Nascent
AI labour shock S08Medium 0.47−0.57−0.69−0.31▲ 616Artificial Intelligence 0.1 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09Medium 0.50−0.55−0.61−0.27▲ 511Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03Low 0.29−0.32−0.43−0.19▲ 1311Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 1.7 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Low 0.33−0.30−0.36−0.16▲ 56Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.8 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Legitimacy rupture−0.45−0.60−1.08−0.54−1.26−1.76−1.45−0.54−0.62
Breadbasket failure−0.41−1.09−0.38−1.03−0.98−1.05−1.12−0.84−0.96
Severe pandemic−0.63−0.40−0.33−0.96−0.84−0.90−0.84−0.83−0.83
Trade bloc rupture−0.63−0.37−0.33−0.37−0.86−0.83−0.86−0.84−1.16
Global funding seizure−0.35−0.42·−0.43−0.39−0.87−1.42−0.99−0.88
Core disaster−0.03−0.88−0.28−0.70−0.32−0.79−0.84−0.72−0.72
AI labour shock−0.55−0.30·−0.79−0.69−0.81−0.69−0.68−0.68
Cryptographic trust break−0.59−0.40−0.73·−0.89−0.83−0.77−0.33−0.38
Regional war spillover−0.18−0.43−0.40−0.17−0.17−0.42−0.39−0.33−0.43
Hybrid coercion−0.22−0.49−0.49·−0.54−0.56·−0.20−0.20
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Angola is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+7.811.63.71556Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+4.011.07.02844Energy Infrastructure 5.3 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed+1.64.63.01669Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed−5.18.513.515157Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−12.413.626.116158Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−14.86.221.013131Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−26.917.244.123177Technical & Vocational Skills 4 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Loser−34.78.943.526183Intelligence & Assessment 4.5 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−38.12.440.56183Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−59.96.966.816183Energy Technologies 1.2 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Angola, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability6.1 Foundational → Inception2.9% Possible · rank 43Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severe×1.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4
Breakdown of state function5.8 Nascent → Inception2.1% Possible · rank 120Legitimacy rupture Severe + Breadbasket failure Severe×1.6Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4
Broad fall in financial strength5.8 Nascent → Inception1.4% Possible · rank 70Global funding seizure Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4
Food and water failure5.7 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 34Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×1.8Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Health system failure5.0 Nascent → Inception1.0% Possible · rank 36Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Broad fall in governance and integrity5.4 Nascent → Inception1.0% Possible · rank 121Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Breadbasket failure Major×1.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4
Breakdown of information trust4.6 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 64Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Breadbasket failure Major×1.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4
Rule of law failure5.4 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 70Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Breadbasket failure Major×1.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4
Broad fall in trade and investment5.1 Nascent → Inception0.5% Unlikely · rank 72Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Breadbasket failure Majorplans fail×2.6Structural Transformation & Complexity 4.3
Broad fall in information and influence4.9 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 74Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Breadbasket failure Majorplans fail×2.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4
Diplomatic isolation5.4 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 79Legitimacy rupture Major + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×2.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Rupture in trade and supply5.9 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 147Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.9Structural Transformation & Complexity 4.3
Defence readiness failure5.5 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 51Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Breadbasket failure Majorplans fail×2.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4
Loss of industrial capacity5.3 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 128Global funding seizure Extreme + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.8Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Broad fall in human capital4.6 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 67Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Education pipeline failure5.3 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 49Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Broad fall in production and innovation4.5 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 115Global funding seizure Extreme + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×3.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure6.3 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 115Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.8National Resilience & Crisis Management 5.2
Collapse in energy security6.0 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 122Breadbasket failure Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Broad fall in national security3.9 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 86Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4
Broad fall in critical technology0.8 Inception— No route · rank 130Already at the foot of the scale×4.7—
Loss of advanced technology base0.4 Inception— No route · rank 130Already at the foot of the scale×8.2—
Failure of digital lifelines5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 137No route found · closest 2.3 of 3×3.6—
Loss of strategic deterrence1.7 Inception— No route · rank 130Already at the foot of the scale×4.2—
Strategic awareness failure2.8 Inception— No route · rank 133Already at the foot of the scale×2.7—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.8 Inception— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.7—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure6.3 Foundational— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Broad rise in national security3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Broad rise in human capital4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.2—
Broad rise in information and influence4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.3—
Broad rise in governance and integrity5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.5—
Broad rise in financial strength5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.8—
Broad rise in production and innovation4.5 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.8—
Broad rise in trade and investment5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×3.7—
Assured space services1.9 Inception— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.8—
Frontier AI and compute0.8 Inception— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.3—
Higher-value manufacturing2.6 Inception— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.8—
Reliable low-cost energy3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.7—
Secure food and water supply5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.3—
More deployable joint force5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Adaptable skilled workforce4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.7—
Stronger health and biotechnology3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.5—
Stronger information environment4.4 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.3—
Wider international influence5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.7—
Capable digital government5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.7—
Trusted public institutions5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.7—
Deeper long-term finance5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.9—
Research translated into value3.5 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.8—
Higher-value international business4.4 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.5—
Sophisticated export strength4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.4—