Trusted public institutions
Public institutions apply rules predictably, protect enforceable rights and demonstrate effective integrity and independent oversight in their decisions.
Why it matters
Trustworthy institutions protect citizens and make public spending and private investment more dependable.
Signs it has been reached
- Administrative and judicial decisions become more consistent
- Verified integrity breaches receive effective remedies
- Oversight recommendations produce documented institutional improvements
Met when
The mean score of these 4 capability groups rises half a band (1.5 points).
- Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption
- Transparency, Oversight & Accountability
- Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls
- Justice System & Fundamental Rights
Held by all three panel models.
Reverse stress test
Working backwards from this outcome to the scenarios and conditions most likely to produce it, nation by nation, over 10 years.
- Nations with a route
- 85
- of 197 · 8 reach the Frontier band
- Typical likelihood
- none
- median nation, over 10 years
- Leads most routes
- Outbreak defence succeeds
- 29 of 85 nations
- Typical headroom
- ×3.4
- times Standard Severe, nearest single scenario
What produces it
Each nation’s most likely route, counted three ways: the scenario that does most of the work, the form the route takes, and the capability where a change would move the result most.
Lead scenario
Nations
Form of the route
Nations
Two scenarios together
One scenario at Extreme
One scenario at Standard Severe
82
2
1
Binding capability
Nations
Biotechnology & Health Technologies
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
Information Environment & Strategic Communication
Artificial Intelligence
Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls
33
22
9
5
4
Likelihood, by region
One dot per nation. The bar marks each region’s mean. Further right is more likely.
- North America
- Europe
- China
- Indo-Pacific
- South Asia
- Gulf and Middle East
- Africa
- Latin America and Caribbean
- Russia and Eurasia
Most likely: United States 21%, Japan 20%, Germany 20%, Netherlands 20%, South Korea 19%.
Who is in a position to take it?
Each nation’s score on this basket today against the likelihood of the outcome.
- North America
- Europe
- China
- Indo-Pacific
- South Asia
- Gulf and Middle East
- Africa
- Latin America and Caribbean
- Russia and Eurasia
All 197 nations
The route shown is the most likely one, and the basket column shows the band the nation would move to. A full band is the same fall for every nation: for a strong nation it is serious but leaves it well above where a weak nation starts. Where no route was found, the closest approach is the furthest any condition moved the basket, against the 1.5 points needed.
All 197 nations
197 of 197 nations
Rank | Nation | Region | Basket | Likelihood | 3 years | Most likely route | Headroom | Moves first | Lever |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | North America | 16.0 Advanced → Advanced | 21% Likely | 6.6% | Automated discovery step Severe | ×0.9 S17 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 17.7 |
| 2 | Japan | Indo-Pacific | 15.0 Advanced → Advanced | 20% Likely | 6.3% | Automated discovery step Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Major | ×1.1 S17 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Artificial Intelligence 15.7 |
| 3 | Germany | Europe | 16.4 Advanced → Advanced | 20% Likely | 6.2% | Clean power threshold Major+Automated discovery step Major | ×1.1 S17 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Artificial Intelligence 15.7 |
| 4 | Netherlands | Europe | 16.5 Advanced → Advanced | 20% Likely | 6.2% | Automated discovery step Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Major | ×1.2 S20 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 13.7 |
| 5 | South Korea | Indo-Pacific | 15.4 Advanced → Advanced | 19% Likely | 5.9% | Automated discovery step Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Major | ×1.1 S17 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Artificial Intelligence 16 |
| 6 | Taiwan | Indo-Pacific | 14.8 Established → Advanced | 18% Likely | 5.8% | Automated discovery step Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.4 S20 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2 |
| 7 | Sweden | Europe | 17.2 Advanced → Frontier | 15% Likely | 4.8% | Chronic disease advance Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.2 S20 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls · reaches Frontier | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 14 |
| 8 | Singapore | Indo-Pacific | 14.4 Established → Advanced | 15% Likely | 4.8% | Automated discovery step Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Major | ×1.1 S20 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 14.3 |
| 9 | France | Europe | 16.0 Advanced → Advanced | 14% Likely | 4.5% | Automated discovery step Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.2 S17 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Health System Capability 16.7 |
| 10 | Finland | Europe | 17.4 Advanced → Frontier | 14% Likely | 4.5% | Chronic disease advance Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.4 S20 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls · reaches Frontier | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7 |
| 11 | United Kingdom | Europe | 16.4 Advanced → Frontier | 13% Likely | 4.2% | Automated discovery step Major+Chronic disease advance Severe | ×1.1 S19 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls · reaches Frontier | Health System Capability 16.3 |
| 12 | Belgium | Europe | 14.8 Established → Advanced | 13% Likely | 4.0% | Automated discovery step Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.4 S20 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11 |
| 13 | Switzerland | Europe | 15.4 Advanced → Advanced | 13% Likely | 3.9% | Automated discovery step Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.3 S20 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7 |
| 14 | Israel | Gulf and Middle East | 13.7 Established → Advanced | 12% Likely | 3.8% | Automated discovery step Major+Chronic disease advance Severe | ×1.3 S17 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 14.8 |
| 15 | Australia | Indo-Pacific | 16.3 Advanced → Frontier | 12% Likely | 3.6% | Chronic disease advance Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.2 S19 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls · reaches Frontier | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 14.3 |
| 16 | Spain | Europe | 14.2 Established → Advanced | 12% Likely | 3.6% | Chronic disease advance Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.4 S15 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.6 |
| 17 | Italy | Europe | 12.8 Established → Established | 11% Likely | 3.3% | Clean power threshold Major+Automated discovery step Severe | ×1.5 S17 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Artificial Intelligence 11.3 |
| 18 | China | China | 9.3 Transitional → Transitional | 11% Likely | 3.1% | Clean power threshold Major+Automated discovery step Severe | ×1.2 S17 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 13.3 |
| 19 | Canada | North America | 16.4 Advanced → Frontier | 10% Likely | 3.1% | Automated discovery step Major+Chronic disease advance Severe | ×1.1 S19 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls · reaches Frontier | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 15.8 |
| 20 | Denmark | Europe | 17.0 Advanced → Frontier | 7.7% Likely | 2.3% | Chronic disease advance Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.3 S20 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls · reaches Frontier | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12 |
| 21 | Norway | Europe | 17.1 Advanced → Frontier | 7.4% Likely | 2.3% | Chronic disease advance Major+Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.5 S20 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls · reaches Frontier | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 12 |
| 22 | Austria | Europe | 14.9 Established → Advanced | 5.9% Likely | 1.8% | Automated discovery step Extreme | ×1.6 S17 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Artificial Intelligence 10 |
| 23 | Ireland | Europe | 15.2 Advanced → Advanced | 5.4% Likely | 1.6% | Chronic disease advance Severe+Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.6 S20 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11 |
| 24 | India | South Asia | 10.7 Transitional → Established | 5.2% Likely | 1.6% | Water-efficient food leap Major+Public service leap Severe | ×1.3 S18 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 10 |
| 25 | Poland | Europe | 12.6 Established → Established | 4.9% Possible | 1.5% | Chronic disease advance Severe+Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.7 S15 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2 |
Showing 1–25 of 197 nations · page 1 of 8
Neighbouring outcomes
- Broad fall in governance and integrityFailure outcome
- Broad rise in governance and integrityProsperity outcome
- Breakdown of information trustFailure outcome
- Breakdown of state functionFailure outcome
- Rule of law failureFailure outcome
- Capable digital governmentProsperity outcome
A failure outcome is met when the basket falls a full band, which is three points. A prosperity outcome is met when the basket rises half a band, 1.5 points: in this model gains from a scenario are smaller and slower than losses, so the bar is set lower and the difference is stated.