Latin America and Caribbean · BLZ

Belize

Baseline index 4.03Rank 142 of 197NascentLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
32.3
rank 64 of 197 · 3 years: 32.0
Worst case
−19.9%
Regional war spillover · tail −19.1%
Opportunity · 10 years
−10.2
rank 127 of 197 · 3 years: −10.0
Best case
+4
Debt service reset · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
19%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.27
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
8of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Advanced Materials & Manufacturing
weakest point in 1 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Global funding seizure, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: public debt relative to gdp; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Belize’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.72−0.80−0.95−0.43▼ 116Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.83−0.77−0.98−0.44▼ 412Investment Attraction & Projection 1.4 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.64−0.73−0.89−0.40▲ 116Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.65−0.71−0.86−0.39014Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.76−0.69−0.90−0.41▲ 216Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0.3 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.64−0.66−0.89−0.39▼ 115Energy Infrastructure 2.4 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.65−0.62−0.69−0.33▲ 213Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.49−0.55−0.64−0.29▲ 311Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.29−0.35−0.45−0.20▲ 713Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 2.8 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Low 0.35−0.32−0.37−0.16▲ 18Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 0.1 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.16−1.17−0.74−0.45−0.45−1.13−1.05−0.90−1.16
Global funding seizure−0.17−0.53·−0.54−0.48−1.09−1.77−1.24−1.10
Severe pandemic−0.20−0.43−0.31−1.05−0.92−0.98−0.92−0.90−0.90
AI labour shock−0.20−0.40·−1.05−0.92−1.09−0.92−0.90−0.90
Legitimacy rupture−0.16−0.47−0.71−0.43−1.00−1.39−1.14−0.43−0.49
Core disaster−0.04−1.00−0.29−0.80−0.36−0.89−0.95−0.82−0.82
Cryptographic trust break−0.20−0.51−0.69·−1.14−1.07−1.00−0.43−0.49
Trade bloc rupture−0.18−0.32−0.25−0.32−0.74−0.71−0.74−0.72−0.99
Breadbasket failure−0.10−0.45−0.14−0.42−0.40−0.43−0.46−0.35−0.40
Hybrid coercion−0.14−0.55−0.51·−0.61−0.63·−0.23−0.23
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Belize is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+3.511.17.52652Energy Infrastructure 3.9 · Nascent
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+1.38.16.814141Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+0.47.67.312129Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−5.314.319.62290Investment Attraction & Projection 3.3 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−5.84.910.816150Intelligence & Assessment 1.3 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−7.411.018.416114Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−11.210.621.815133Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−18.14.622.710155Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−18.74.222.913185Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−21.42.223.64108Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Belize, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability6.0 Nascent → Inception4.0% Possible · rank 18Global funding seizure Extreme×1.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.8
Breakdown of state function8.1 Foundational → Nascent2.3% Possible · rank 107Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Broad fall in financial strength5.7 Nascent → Inception2.0% Possible · rank 28Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Majorplans fail×1.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.8
Broad fall in governance and integrity7.4 Foundational → Nascent1.2% Possible · rank 104Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Rule of law failure7.1 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 83Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Broad fall in trade and investment4.5 Nascent → Inception0.6% Unlikely · rank 63Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.6Resource Infrastructure 2.3
Rupture in trade and supply4.5 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 131Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×1.9Resource Infrastructure 2.3
Broad fall in production and innovation4.2 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 46Global funding seizure Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.4Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.8
Health system failure7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 127Global funding seizure Severe + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2
Loss of industrial capacity4.1 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 75Global funding seizure Extreme + Regional war spillover Severe×2.3Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.8
Food and water failure5.7 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 165Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.8Financial System Depth & Access 5.4
Breakdown of information trust4.1 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 160Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Broad fall in human capital6.1 Foundational → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 146Global funding seizure Extreme + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.9Artificial Intelligence 0.3
Education pipeline failure7.0 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 186AI labour shock Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2
Broad fall in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 142Already at the foot of the scale×15—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure4.3 Nascent → Inception— Remote · rank 171Regional war spillover Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.6Resource Infrastructure 2.3
Broad fall in national security1.1 Inception— No route · rank 144Already at the foot of the scale×4.0—
Broad fall in information and influence2.9 Inception— No route · rank 162Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Loss of advanced technology base0.1 Inception— No route · rank 142Already at the foot of the scale×48—
Collapse in energy security2.2 Inception— No route · rank 148Already at the foot of the scale×2.2—
Failure of digital lifelines4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 2.5 of 3×3.6—
Defence readiness failure1.8 Inception— No route · rank 153Already at the foot of the scale×2.9—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 142Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Strategic awareness failure0.8 Inception— No route · rank 144Already at the foot of the scale×3.9—
Diplomatic isolation2.8 Inception— No route · rank 170Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×8.3—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.8—
Broad rise in national security1.1 Inception— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×19—
Broad rise in human capital6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.3—
Broad rise in information and influence2.9 Inception— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.1—
Broad rise in governance and integrity7.4 Foundational— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.6—
Broad rise in financial strength5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.8—
Broad rise in production and innovation4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.0—
Broad rise in trade and investment4.5 Nascent— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.5—
Assured space services0.4 Inception— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.1—
Higher-value manufacturing1.5 Inception— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.3—
Reliable low-cost energy2.1 Inception— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.6—
Secure food and water supply5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.0—
More deployable joint force1.6 Inception— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×20—
Adaptable skilled workforce5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.6—
Stronger health and biotechnology5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
Stronger information environment3.0 Nascent— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.1—
Wider international influence2.8 Inception— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.1—
Capable digital government6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.5—
Trusted public institutions6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.5—
Deeper long-term finance5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.2—
Research translated into value3.0 Nascent— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.0—
Higher-value international business4.4 Nascent— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.2—
Sophisticated export strength4.4 Nascent— No route · rank 142No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.2—