Latin America and Caribbean · BOL

Bolivia

Baseline index 5.11Rank 117 of 197NascentLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Insulated over 10 years: lower vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
20.8
rank 101 of 197 · 3 years: 20.4
Worst case
−14.9%
Severe pandemic · tail −13.8%
Opportunity · 10 years
−20.6
rank 179 of 197 · 3 years: −20.8
Best case
+8
Debt service reset · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
22%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.21
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
1of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI labour shock, Global funding seizure, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: no coastline; few months of imports covered by reserves; oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Bolivia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Severe pandemic S10High 0.65−0.76−0.97−0.43▲ 219Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08Medium 0.59−0.69−0.86−0.38▲ 317Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.71−0.67−0.91−0.40▼ 218Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.1 · Nascent
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.61−0.65−0.75−0.34▲ 215Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.65−0.63−0.81−0.36▼ 220Investment Attraction & Projection 2.5 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.62−0.62−0.86−0.38▼ 119Trade Facilitation & Logistics 4.2 · Nascent
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.37−0.43−0.53−0.24▲ 310Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.33−0.39−0.51−0.22▲ 112Trade Facilitation & Logistics 4.7 · Nascent
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.38−0.34−0.42−0.19▲ 39Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03Low 0.25−0.29−0.37−0.16▲ 711Maritime Power 0.2 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Severe pandemic−0.65−0.42−0.34−1.01−0.88−0.94−0.88−0.86−0.86
AI labour shock−0.64−0.36·−0.95−0.83−0.98−0.83−0.82−0.82
Legitimacy rupture−0.36−0.43−0.77−0.39−0.91−1.26−1.04−0.39−0.44
Cryptographic trust break−0.67−0.48−0.87·−1.06−0.99−0.93−0.40−0.45
Global funding seizure−0.36−0.42·−0.42−0.38−0.86−1.40−0.98−0.87
Core disaster−0.03−0.93−0.30−0.74−0.33−0.83−0.89−0.76−0.76
Trade bloc rupture−0.49−0.22−0.20−0.22−0.51−0.49−0.51−0.50−0.69
Breadbasket failure−0.21−0.49−0.17−0.46−0.44−0.47−0.50−0.38−0.43
Hybrid coercion−0.26−0.56−0.54·−0.62−0.64·−0.23−0.23
Regional war spillover−0.16−0.38−0.35−0.15−0.15−0.37−0.34−0.30−0.38
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Bolivia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+7.814.97.13425Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 6 · Foundational
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+4.210.56.318111Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−5.513.118.619102Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−13.912.025.919150Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−14.713.228.025138Investment Attraction & Projection 4 · Nascent
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−15.16.121.218167Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−15.23.618.813133Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−25.23.829.08133Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Loser−34.72.437.126182Intelligence & Assessment 4 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−46.95.752.620176Energy Technologies 2 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Bolivia, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability6.3 Foundational → Nascent1.4% Possible · rank 123Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×2.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Breakdown of state function7.9 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 171Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Broad fall in financial strength5.9 Nascent → Inception0.7% Unlikely · rank 138Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.1Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Broad fall in governance and integrity7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 170Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Severe×2.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Breakdown of information trust5.8 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 125Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Severe×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Loss of industrial capacity5.8 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 85Global funding seizure Extreme + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Rule of law failure7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 165Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Health system failure7.7 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 157Trade bloc rupture Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Broad fall in production and innovation5.2 Nascent → Inception0.2% Unlikely · rank 96Global funding seizure Extreme + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×3.1Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Rupture in trade and supply5.6 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 172Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.0Financial System Depth & Access 6.8
Food and water failure7.0 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 172Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.0Financial System Depth & Access 6.8
Broad fall in trade and investment5.2 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 163Global funding seizure Extreme + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.5Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Broad fall in information and influence4.9 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 147Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Diplomatic isolation4.7 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 154Legitimacy rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure6.6 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 154Breadbasket failure Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.2Financial System Depth & Access 6.8
Broad fall in human capital7.1 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 173Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Education pipeline failure8.3 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 183AI labour shock Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Broad fall in critical technology1.0 Inception— No route · rank 118Already at the foot of the scale×4.5—
Broad fall in national security2.8 Inception— No route · rank 124Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Loss of advanced technology base0.6 Inception— No route · rank 118Already at the foot of the scale×6.7—
Collapse in energy security5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 136No route found · closest 2.8 of 3×3.9—
Failure of digital lifelines5.3 Nascent— No route · rank 133No route found · closest 2.4 of 3×3.2—
Defence readiness failure3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 138No route found · closest 2.8 of 3×3.1—
Loss of strategic deterrence1.1 Inception— No route · rank 118Already at the foot of the scale×5.7—
Strategic awareness failure2.4 Inception— No route · rank 123Already at the foot of the scale×2.4—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology1.0 Inception— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.9—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.1—
Broad rise in national security2.8 Inception— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×19—
Broad rise in human capital7.1 Foundational— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.5—
Broad rise in information and influence4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Broad rise in governance and integrity7.3 Foundational— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.7—
Broad rise in financial strength5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.0—
Broad rise in production and innovation5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Broad rise in trade and investment5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.8—
Assured space services1.6 Inception— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×10—
Frontier AI and compute0.8 Inception— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Higher-value manufacturing3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.7—
Reliable low-cost energy4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Secure food and water supply7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.7—
More deployable joint force3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×19—
Adaptable skilled workforce5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.1—
Stronger health and biotechnology5.5 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.0—
Stronger information environment5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.1—
Wider international influence4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Capable digital government6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 118No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—
Trusted public institutions6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 118No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.8—
Deeper long-term finance6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Research translated into value4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Higher-value international business4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.5—
Sophisticated export strength5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.7—