Latin America and Caribbean · CHL

Chile

Baseline index 10.62Rank 41 of 197TransitionalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Low vulnerability, and gains from open markets and digital public services. One of 39 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
9.2
rank 167 of 197 · 3 years: 9.0
Worst case
−6.4%
Severe pandemic · tail −5.9%
Opportunity · 10 years
+11.0
rank 40 of 197 · 3 years: +11.3
Best case
+33
Clean power threshold · gainer in 5 of 10
Shock absorbed
45%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.09
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI labour shock, Regional war spillover, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: internet users as a share of population; share of exports going to china and the united states; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; urban share of population; adult obesity rate; youth unemployment rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Chile’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Severe pandemic S10High 0.77−0.68−1.19−0.52▲ 113Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.3 · Nascent
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.71−0.61−0.91−0.40▲ 214Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
AI labour shock S08High 0.69−0.58−1.03−0.45▲ 212Artificial Intelligence 5.5 · Nascent
Regional war spillover S03High 0.69−0.55−1.01−0.44▲ 411Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 3.9 · Nascent
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.62−0.53−0.93−0.41▲ 111Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.78−0.53−1.08−0.47011Energy Infrastructure 9.7 · Transitional
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.76−0.50−0.98−0.43▼ 110Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7.2 · Foundational
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.46−0.32−0.51−0.22▲ 48Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.8 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.50−0.31−0.62−0.27▲ 26Labour & Employment 10.5 · Transitional
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.27−0.21−0.42−0.18▲ 27Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 10.3 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Severe pandemic−0.72−0.36−0.30−0.88−0.77−0.82−0.77−0.75−0.75
Cryptographic trust break−0.79−0.43−0.79·−0.96−0.90−0.84−0.36−0.41
AI labour shock−0.64−0.29·−0.78−0.68−0.81−0.68−0.67−0.67
Regional war spillover−0.31−0.74−0.68−0.28−0.28−0.71−0.66−0.57−0.73
Trade bloc rupture−0.70−0.27−0.24−0.27−0.63−0.60−0.63−0.61−0.84
Core disaster−0.03−0.80−0.26−0.63−0.28−0.71−0.76−0.65−0.65
Legitimacy rupture−0.29−0.32−0.58−0.29−0.67−0.94−0.77−0.29−0.33
Hybrid coercion−0.24−0.52−0.52·−0.58−0.60·−0.22−0.22
Global funding seizure−0.19−0.20·−0.21−0.19−0.42−0.68−0.48−0.43
Breadbasket failure−0.11−0.26−0.09−0.25−0.24−0.25−0.27−0.20−0.23
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Chile is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+32.834.11.34427Energy Technologies 6.2 · Foundational
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+28.932.43.44649Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 · Foundational
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+19.339.219.94732Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Gainer+12.722.59.84422Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 5.2 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+10.815.04.25159Intelligence & Assessment 8.7 · Foundational
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+6.628.522.05848Energy Infrastructure 10.9 · Transitional
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+4.58.23.66138Energy Infrastructure 10.9 · Transitional
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+0.512.111.646100Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 · Foundational
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed+0.116.716.63147Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.8 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Mixed−4.413.217.72354Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.8 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Chile, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function13.9 Established → Transitional1.3% Possible · rank 165Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×3.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Loss of financial stability13.8 Established → Transitional1.2% Possible · rank 144Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×3.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8.3
Broad fall in governance and integrity13.6 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 160Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×3.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8.3
Broad fall in financial strength13.2 Established → Transitional0.6% Unlikely · rank 152Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×3.6Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8.3
Breakdown of information trust10.5 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 95Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×3.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8.3
Rupture in trade and supply12.0 Established → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 120Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.0Alliances & Security Cooperation 10
Broad fall in trade and investment12.1 Established → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 95Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×3.5Advanced Manufacturing 10
Diplomatic isolation9.6 Transitional → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 85Trade bloc rupture Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.1Quantum Technologies 3
Health system failure13.0 Established → Transitional0.3% Unlikely · rank 160Trade bloc rupture Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Broad fall in information and influence9.4 Transitional → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 90Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.1Quantum Technologies 3
Rule of law failure13.9 Established → Transitional0.3% Unlikely · rank 171Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×3.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8.3
Defence readiness failure10.5 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Unlikely · rank 56Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×4.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8.3
Strategic awareness failure6.5 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 78Trade bloc rupture Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 3
Collapse in energy security9.6 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 102Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×3.2Alliances & Security Cooperation 10
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure11.8 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 108Hybrid coercion Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.8Social Infrastructure 12.9
Broad fall in production and innovation11.0 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 112Trade bloc rupture Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×4.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Loss of industrial capacity11.1 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 133Trade bloc rupture Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×4.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Broad fall in national security7.6 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 59Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.8Quantum Technologies 3
Food and water failure13.7 Established → Transitional0.1% Remote · rank 156Hybrid coercion Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.5Social Infrastructure 12.9
Broad fall in critical technology4.4 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 47Trade bloc rupture Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Failure of digital lifelines10.4 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 84Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.1Quantum Technologies 3
Broad fall in human capital12.3 Established → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 150AI labour shock Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Education pipeline failure12.9 Established → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 156AI labour shock Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Loss of advanced technology base3.0 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 54Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.7Advanced Manufacturing 10
Loss of strategic deterrence3.0 Nascent— No route · rank 52No route found · closest 2.8 of 3×5.3—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology10.9 Transitional → Established3.3% Possible · rank 40Chronic disease advance Extreme×1.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Reliable low-cost energy8.5 Foundational → Transitional3.0% Possible · rank 34Clean power threshold Extreme×1.5Energy Technologies 6.2
Capable digital government12.8 Established → Established2.1% Possible · rank 39Public service leap Major + Chronic disease advance Extreme×1.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Broad rise in governance and integrity13.6 Established → Advanced1.8% Possible · rank 39Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Trusted public institutions13.4 Established → Established1.4% Possible · rank 40Public service leap Major + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Broad rise in critical technology4.4 Nascent → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 41Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Broad rise in human capital12.3 Established → Established0.4% Unlikely · rank 39Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Broad rise in trade and investment12.1 Established → Established0.4% Unlikely · rank 43Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Severe×2.2Energy Infrastructure 10.9
Higher-value international business12.2 Established → Established0.4% Unlikely · rank 40Market access opening Severe + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.1Energy Technologies 6.2
Broad rise in financial strength13.2 Established → Established0.1% Remote · rank 37Clean power threshold Severe + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Deeper long-term finance12.7 Established → Established0.1% Remote · rank 34Clean power threshold Extreme + Chronic disease advance Severe×2.4Energy Technologies 6.2
Sophisticated export strength12.0 Established → Established0.1% Remote · rank 41Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.6Energy Infrastructure 10.9
Adaptable skilled workforce11.2 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 42Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure11.8 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 49Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.4Energy Technologies 6.2
Frontier AI and compute4.3 Nascent → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 52Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Broad rise in production and innovation11.0 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 44Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.3Energy Technologies 6.2
Secure food and water supply13.7 Established → Advancedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 52Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.9Energy Technologies 6.2
Stronger information environment9.2 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 41Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6
Research translated into value10.2 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 52Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.5Energy Technologies 6.2
Higher-value manufacturing7.3 Foundational → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 50Clean power threshold Extreme + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.9Energy Technologies 6.2
Broad rise in national security7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 42No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.0—
Broad rise in information and influence9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 49No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.6—
Assured space services4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 43No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
More deployable joint force10.4 Transitional— No route · rank 41No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.0—
Wider international influence9.6 Transitional— No route · rank 55No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.1—