Africa · COM

Comoros

Baseline index 2.29Rank 183 of 197InceptionAfricaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile and exposed. Highly vulnerable importers of fuel, finance and food. One of 35 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
53.9
rank 18 of 197 · 3 years: 53.7
Worst case
−46.4%
Breadbasket failure · tail −37.0%
Opportunity · 10 years
−10.3
rank 131 of 197 · 3 years: −10.3
Best case
+3
Clean power threshold · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
10%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.28
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
9of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Breadbasket failure, Regional war spillover, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; staple foods among the top five imports; remittances relative to gdp; low real gdp per head; low life expectancy at birth.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Comoros’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Breadbasket failure S06High 0.83−1.06−1.19−0.54▼ 521Energy Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03High 0.69−0.78−0.84−0.40017Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.70−0.70−0.80−0.37016Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.59−0.69−0.80−0.35▼ 218Energy Infrastructure 0.6 · Inception
AI labour shock S08Medium 0.49−0.59−0.65−0.29▲ 110Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.48−0.59−0.66−0.29▲ 112Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09Medium 0.49−0.49−0.51−0.24▲ 18Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.41−0.43−0.49−0.22▲ 210Investment Attraction & Projection 0.6 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Low 0.24−0.29−0.31−0.14▲ 34Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Low 0.25−0.24−0.26−0.11▲ 15Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Breadbasket failure−0.11−1.30−0.37−1.34−1.26−1.37−1.46−1.08−1.25
Regional war spillover−0.11−1.04−0.52−0.47−0.47−1.17−1.10−0.94−1.18
Legitimacy rupture−0.11−0.50−0.59−0.45−1.03−1.46−1.20−0.45−0.51
Core disaster−0.04−1.00−0.26−0.84−0.38−0.94−1.00−0.86−0.86
AI labour shock−0.11−0.33·−0.89−0.78−0.92−0.78−0.76−0.76
Severe pandemic−0.11−0.35−0.22−0.85−0.75−0.80−0.75−0.73−0.73
Cryptographic trust break−0.11−0.42−0.47·−0.93−0.87−0.81−0.35−0.40
Global funding seizure−0.09−0.30·−0.30−0.27−0.61−0.99−0.69−0.62
Trade bloc rupture−0.11−0.17−0.12−0.17−0.39−0.37−0.39−0.38−0.52
Hybrid coercion−0.07−0.42−0.35·−0.47−0.48·−0.17−0.17
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Comoros is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+2.74.72.06120Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+2.06.34.3791Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−2.44.26.610136Intelligence & Assessment 1 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−3.74.98.615150Energy Infrastructure 2.1 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Loser−12.63.616.28188Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−13.11.214.46114Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−13.86.520.311132Investment Attraction & Projection 1.7 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−17.02.819.99165Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−21.17.028.28183Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−24.30.925.22128Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Comoros, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Food and water failure3.1 Nascent → Inception3.0% Possible · rank 13Breadbasket failure Extreme×1.4Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.8
Breakdown of state function4.5 Nascent → Inception2.6% Possible · rank 92Legitimacy rupture Severe + Breadbasket failure Severe×1.8Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.8
Broad fall in governance and integrity3.9 Nascent → Inception1.6% Possible · rank 79Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 1.7
Health system failure4.2 Nascent → Inception1.5% Possible · rank 16Breadbasket failure Extreme + Core disaster Major×1.8Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.8
Loss of financial stability3.5 Nascent → Inception1.3% Possible · rank 132Breadbasket failure Extreme + Core disaster Major×1.8Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.8
Rule of law failure3.7 Nascent → Inception0.9% Unlikely · rank 54Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Breadbasket failure Major×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 1.7
Broad fall in financial strength3.2 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 173Global funding seizure Severe + Breadbasket failure Extreme×2.1Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.8
Education pipeline failure4.1 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 10Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×2.2Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.8
Broad fall in human capital3.3 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 166Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.2Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.8
Broad fall in critical technology0.1 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×27—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure2.5 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Broad fall in national security0.7 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×5.0—
Broad fall in information and influence2.4 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×2.4—
Broad fall in production and innovation2.1 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×2.8—
Broad fall in trade and investment2.4 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×2.4—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale——
Collapse in energy security1.0 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×3.0—
Failure of digital lifelines2.5 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×3.8—
Defence readiness failure1.0 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×3.8—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Strategic awareness failure0.6 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×5.4—
Breakdown of information trust2.6 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Diplomatic isolation2.3 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Loss of industrial capacity2.2 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×2.7—
Rupture in trade and supply2.8 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.1 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure2.5 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Broad rise in national security0.7 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.1 of 1.5×22—
Broad rise in human capital3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×13—
Broad rise in information and influence2.4 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Broad rise in governance and integrity3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.8—
Broad rise in financial strength3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Broad rise in production and innovation2.1 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Broad rise in trade and investment2.4 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.8—
Assured space services0.3 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×19—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Higher-value manufacturing0.9 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×16—
Reliable low-cost energy1.3 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Secure food and water supply3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.9—
More deployable joint force1.0 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.1 of 1.5×24—
Adaptable skilled workforce2.5 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Stronger health and biotechnology2.8 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Stronger information environment2.5 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Wider international influence2.3 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Capable digital government3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.1—
Trusted public institutions3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.1—
Deeper long-term finance3.0 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Research translated into value1.3 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Higher-value international business2.1 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.2—
Sophisticated export strength2.5 Inception— No route · rank 183No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—