Europe · CYP

Cyprus

Baseline index 8.51Rank 64 of 197FoundationalEuropeAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Low vulnerability, and gains from open markets and digital public services. One of 39 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
18.8
rank 115 of 197 · 3 years: 18.5
Worst case
−12.2%
Regional war spillover · tail −10.6%
Opportunity · 10 years
+3.5
rank 61 of 197 · 3 years: +3.7
Best case
+26
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed
35%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.24
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
9of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Energy Infrastructure
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Hybrid coercion, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; refugees hosted per head of population; few months of imports covered by reserves; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population; public debt relative to gdp; little renewable water per head; services as a share of gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Cyprus’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.99−1.04−1.44−0.63▼ 228Resource Infrastructure 1.1 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.91−0.83−1.14−0.50024Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.6 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.88−0.82−1.30−0.57022Artificial Intelligence 2.7 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.83−0.82−1.28−0.56026Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.94−0.67−1.17−0.51▼ 118Economic Output & Productivity 6.9 · Foundational
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.60−0.60−0.87−0.39017Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.1 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.73−0.59−0.81−0.36018Maritime Power 2.1 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.50−0.44−0.78−0.34013Energy Infrastructure 5.7 · Nascent
Core disaster S07Medium 0.56−0.44−0.79−0.34▲ 212Energy Infrastructure 5.6 · Nascent
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.45−0.35−0.58−0.26▲ 214Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.5 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.57−1.39−1.28−0.53−0.53−1.34−1.25−1.07−1.38
Cryptographic trust break−1.02−0.59−1.09·−1.32−1.24−1.16−0.50−0.57
AI labour shock−0.86−0.41·−1.10−0.97−1.14−0.97−0.95−0.95
Severe pandemic−0.83−0.44−0.36−1.07−0.94−1.00−0.94−0.92−0.92
Global funding seizure−0.40−0.45·−0.45−0.40−0.91−1.48−1.04−0.93
Trade bloc rupture−0.77−0.31−0.27−0.31−0.71−0.69−0.71−0.70−0.96
Hybrid coercion−0.43−0.96−0.96·−1.07−1.10·−0.40−0.40
Breadbasket failure−0.23−0.55−0.19−0.51−0.49−0.53−0.56−0.42−0.48
Core disaster−0.02−0.66−0.21−0.53−0.24−0.59−0.63−0.54−0.54
Legitimacy rupture−0.20−0.22−0.40−0.20−0.47−0.65−0.54−0.20−0.23
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Cyprus is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+26.128.32.23551Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+14.321.06.63853Intelligence & Assessment 5.8 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+12.121.39.22672Energy Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+7.623.015.44343Energy Infrastructure 6.5 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+2.99.06.23664Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.6 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Mixed−0.915.816.61850Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.3 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed−1.724.926.63688Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−2.313.215.52556Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.3 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−3.49.212.634122Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−5.54.39.944169Energy Infrastructure 6.5 · Foundational

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Cyprus, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function12.3 Established → Transitional7.0% Likely · rank 7Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severe×1.9Resource Infrastructure 3.3
Loss of financial stability11.5 Transitional → Foundational3.4% Possible · rank 27Global funding seizure Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×1.9Quantum Technologies 2
Broad fall in financial strength11.2 Transitional → Foundational3.2% Possible · rank 3Global funding seizure Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.0Quantum Technologies 2
Broad fall in governance and integrity11.8 Transitional → Foundational2.6% Possible · rank 19Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 2
Strategic awareness failure4.3 Nascent → Inception2.0% Possible · rank 11Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×1.8Quantum Technologies 2
Rupture in trade and supply9.8 Transitional → Foundational2.0% Possible · rank 22Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×1.6Resource Infrastructure 3.3
Collapse in energy security4.0 Nascent → Inception1.8% Possible · rank 9Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×1.7Resource Infrastructure 3.3
Broad fall in trade and investment10.2 Transitional → Foundational1.7% Possible · rank 9Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.2Resource Infrastructure 3.3
Breakdown of information trust8.2 Foundational → Nascent1.5% Possible · rank 17Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 2
Rule of law failure11.6 Transitional → Foundational1.2% Possible · rank 32Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 2
Broad fall in information and influence7.2 Foundational → Nascent1.2% Possible · rank 12Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 2
Diplomatic isolation7.0 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 11Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 2
Loss of industrial capacity8.6 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 7Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×2.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 9.4
Health system failure12.7 Established → Transitional1.0% Possible · rank 38Global funding seizure Major + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×1.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Failure of digital lifelines8.7 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Possible · rank 4Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 2
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure8.4 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 15Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.2Resource Infrastructure 3.3
Defence readiness failure5.7 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 13Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Resource Infrastructure 3.3
Broad fall in production and innovation9.2 Transitional → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 8Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.8Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 9.4
Food and water failure11.7 Transitional → Foundational0.6% Unlikely · rank 56Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.8Resource Infrastructure 3.3
Broad fall in national security4.3 Nascent → Inception0.5% Unlikely · rank 27Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 2
Broad fall in human capital11.9 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 10Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Education pipeline failure12.5 Established → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 8Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Broad fall in critical technology2.4 Inception— No route · rank 68Already at the foot of the scale×2.9—
Loss of advanced technology base1.5 Inception— No route · rank 67Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Loss of strategic deterrence1.7 Inception— No route · rank 69Already at the foot of the scale×2.8—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology9.7 Transitional → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 58Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Capable digital government11.7 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 73Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Broad rise in governance and integrity11.8 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 73Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Reliable low-cost energy4.3 Nascent → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 61Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.4Energy Technologies 2.2
Trusted public institutions11.3 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 74Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Broad rise in trade and investment10.2 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 65Market access opening Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.8Energy Infrastructure 6.5
Higher-value international business10.5 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 69Market access opening Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.6Energy Infrastructure 6.5
Broad rise in critical technology2.4 Inception— No route · rank 65No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.2—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure8.4 Foundational— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.2—
Broad rise in national security4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 64No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.3—
Broad rise in human capital11.9 Transitional— No route · rank 66No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.2—
Broad rise in information and influence7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 65No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×3.0—
Broad rise in financial strength11.2 Transitional— No route · rank 64No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.4—
Broad rise in production and innovation9.2 Transitional— No route · rank 64No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Assured space services1.6 Inception— No route · rank 64No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.0—
Frontier AI and compute2.8 Inception— No route · rank 65No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.2—
Higher-value manufacturing4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 64No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Secure food and water supply11.7 Transitional— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.5—
More deployable joint force5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 64No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Adaptable skilled workforce10.8 Transitional— No route · rank 67No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.5—
Stronger information environment7.3 Foundational— No route · rank 64No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.6—
Wider international influence7.0 Foundational → Foundational— Remote · rank 67Middle East settlement Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.9Intelligence & Assessment 5.8
Deeper long-term finance10.5 Transitional— No route · rank 65No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.8—
Research translated into value9.2 Transitional— No route · rank 67No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Sophisticated export strength9.6 Transitional— No route · rank 65No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.3—