Africa · ERI

Eritrea

Baseline index 2.01Rank 190 of 197InceptionAfricaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Acute fragility. Every scenario is severe; there is little capability left to lose. One of 14 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
71.9
rank 8 of 197 · 3 years: 71.9
Worst case
−45.9%
Breadbasket failure · tail −44.1%
Opportunity · 10 years
−14.7
rank 161 of 197 · 3 years: −14.3
Best case
+3
Clean power threshold · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
7%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.33
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
8of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Monetary & Currency Capability
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Breadbasket failure, Regional war spillover, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; share of exports going to china and the united states; land borders with states in conflict or collapse; low real gdp per head; public debt relative to gdp; low life expectancy at birth; share of population aged under 15; little renewable water per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Eritrea’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Breadbasket failure S06High 0.69−0.92−1.02−0.46▼ 312Monetary & Currency Capability 0.1 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.83−0.88−0.91−0.44▼ 110Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.71−0.86−0.95−0.43▼ 210Financial System Depth & Access 0 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03High 0.69−0.85−0.92−0.42▼ 19Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.73−0.74−0.77−0.3807Monetary & Currency Capability 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.56−0.66−0.70−0.3307Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.50−0.64−0.70−0.32▲ 211Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08Medium 0.40−0.50−0.53−0.24▲ 45Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09Medium 0.41−0.44−0.46−0.21▲ 47Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Low 0.24−0.23−0.26−0.11▲ 36Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.1 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Breadbasket failure−0.17−1.21−0.42−1.14−1.09−1.06−1.25−0.91−1.07
Legitimacy rupture−0.18−0.65−1.13−0.59−1.34−1.29−1.49−0.59−0.65
Core disaster−0.02−1.33−0.43−1.06−0.48−1.08−1.22−1.06−1.09
Regional war spillover−0.17−1.22−1.08−0.47−0.47−1.06−1.10−0.91−1.13
Global funding seizure−0.17−0.56·−0.56−0.51−1.01−1.61−1.19−1.01
Trade bloc rupture−0.18−0.39−0.35−0.39−0.91−0.78−0.91−0.89−1.15
Severe pandemic−0.18−0.38−0.31−0.92−0.80−0.81−0.80−0.78−0.78
AI labour shock−0.18−0.28·−0.74−0.66−0.69−0.66−0.64−0.63
Cryptographic trust break−0.18−0.36−0.65·−0.79−0.71−0.66−0.30−0.34
Hybrid coercion−0.10−0.39−0.39·−0.44−0.45·−0.16−0.16
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Eritrea is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+2.84.82.05119Energy Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+1.45.94.5796Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−0.76.16.810128Justice System & Fundamental Rights 1.3 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−3.95.29.17153Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 0.3 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Loser−13.13.816.98189Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−13.92.015.98151Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−26.64.731.38174Investment Attraction & Projection 1 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−28.24.232.55195Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 0.3 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−29.22.231.44180Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−35.30.635.92175Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Eritrea, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Health system failure4.3 Nascent → Inception1.6% Possible · rank 13Breadbasket failure Major + Core disaster Extreme×2.1Financial System Depth & Access 1.6
Food and water failure3.6 Nascent → Inception1.5% Possible · rank 19Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Severe×1.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.2
Defence readiness failure4.6 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 44Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.0Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 0.3
Education pipeline failure3.5 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 67Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.2
Broad fall in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×16—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure2.7 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Broad fall in national security2.9 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Broad fall in human capital3.0 Nascent— No route · rank 191No route found · closest 3.0 of 3×2.6—
Broad fall in information and influence2.7 Inception— No route · rank 191Already at the foot of the scale×2.2—
Broad fall in governance and integrity1.7 Inception— No route · rank 192Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Broad fall in financial strength1.7 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Broad fall in production and innovation1.7 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Broad fall in trade and investment1.6 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Loss of advanced technology base0.1 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×41—
Collapse in energy security1.6 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Failure of digital lifelines1.7 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×4.0—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.8 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×3.9—
Strategic awareness failure1.6 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×3.8—
Breakdown of information trust1.6 Inception— No route · rank 191Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Diplomatic isolation2.2 Inception— No route · rank 191Already at the foot of the scale×2.4—
Breakdown of state function2.4 Inception— No route · rank 192Already at the foot of the scale×1.8—
Rule of law failure0.9 Inception— No route · rank 192Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Loss of financial stability1.8 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×1.8—
Loss of industrial capacity2.1 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×2.4—
Rupture in trade and supply2.5 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×2.0—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure2.7 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×13—
Broad rise in national security2.9 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×15—
Broad rise in human capital3.0 Nascent— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Broad rise in information and influence2.7 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×12—
Broad rise in governance and integrity1.7 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Broad rise in financial strength1.7 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Broad rise in production and innovation1.7 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Broad rise in trade and investment1.6 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Assured space services0.5 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×23—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×17—
Higher-value manufacturing1.1 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×17—
Reliable low-cost energy1.2 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×10—
Secure food and water supply3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×8.5—
More deployable joint force4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×16—
Adaptable skilled workforce2.0 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Stronger health and biotechnology3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Stronger information environment3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×16—
Wider international influence2.2 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×9.8—
Capable digital government2.1 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Trusted public institutions1.0 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Deeper long-term finance1.8 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Research translated into value1.1 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Higher-value international business0.9 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Sophisticated export strength1.6 Inception— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×16—