Africa · GHA

Ghana

Baseline index 6.98Rank 81 of 197FoundationalAfricaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Stretched developers. Exposed to food and funding shocks; debt relief and better yields are their upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Insulated over 10 years: lower vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
15.6
rank 129 of 197 · 3 years: 15.4
Worst case
−9.7%
Global funding seizure · tail −9.4%
Opportunity · 10 years
−7.2
rank 105 of 197 · 3 years: −7.2
Best case
+18
Debt service reset · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed
29%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.19
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
9of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Global funding seizure, Breadbasket failure, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: consumer price inflation; few months of imports covered by reserves; share of population aged under 15; oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; low life expectancy at birth.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Ghana’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Global funding seizure S02High 0.77−0.68−0.96−0.42▼ 411Labour & Employment 5.1 · Nascent
Severe pandemic S10High 0.60−0.67−0.93−0.41014Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.5 · Nascent
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.76−0.63−0.97−0.43015Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.2 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.57−0.63−0.89−0.39▼ 313Energy Infrastructure 6.2 · Foundational
AI labour shock S08Medium 0.57−0.61−0.84−0.37014Artificial Intelligence 3.1 · Nascent
Cryptographic trust break S09Medium 0.59−0.61−0.75−0.33015Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.49−0.47−0.69−0.30▼ 110Energy Infrastructure 6.4 · Foundational
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.41−0.44−0.61−0.2708Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.36−0.30−0.40−0.18012Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03Low 0.28−0.29−0.41−0.18▲ 78Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 1.4 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Global funding seizure−0.41−0.45·−0.45−0.41−0.92−1.50−1.05−0.93
Severe pandemic−0.71−0.35−0.29−0.86−0.75−0.81−0.75−0.74−0.74
Legitimacy rupture−0.37−0.40−0.73−0.37−0.86−1.19−0.98−0.37−0.42
Breadbasket failure−0.33−0.78−0.27−0.74−0.70−0.75−0.80−0.60−0.69
AI labour shock−0.68−0.31·−0.82−0.72−0.85−0.72−0.71−0.71
Cryptographic trust break−0.79−0.43−0.79·−0.96−0.90−0.84−0.36−0.41
Core disaster−0.03−0.71−0.23−0.56−0.25−0.63−0.67−0.58−0.58
Trade bloc rupture−0.57−0.22−0.20−0.22−0.52−0.50−0.52−0.51−0.70
Hybrid coercion−0.22−0.48−0.48·−0.54−0.55·−0.20−0.20
Regional war spillover−0.16−0.38−0.35−0.15−0.15−0.37−0.34−0.29−0.38
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Ghana is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Debt service reset S11 ↗Gainer+17.723.65.9411Energy Infrastructure 7.4 · Foundational
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Gainer+16.119.13.03122Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.8 · Nascent
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+7.217.910.731100Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.8 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+5.624.318.62953Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed−1.612.013.73287Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.8 · Nascent
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−2.926.229.13979Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 7.3 · Foundational
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−4.26.310.52160Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Loser−18.611.930.536171Intelligence & Assessment 5.8 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−21.76.628.314110Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−35.59.945.526169Energy Technologies 3 · Nascent

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Ghana, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability8.1 Foundational → Nascent2.4% Possible · rank 63Global funding seizure Major + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×1.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Broad fall in financial strength7.9 Foundational → Nascent1.3% Possible · rank 77Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Majorplans fail×2.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.8
Breakdown of state function9.5 Transitional → Foundational1.2% Possible · rank 170Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Broad fall in governance and integrity9.4 Transitional → Foundational0.8% Unlikely · rank 157Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Health system failure8.0 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 97Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.8
Rule of law failure9.9 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 122Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Breakdown of information trust8.0 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 104Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Broad fall in production and innovation7.0 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 79Global funding seizure Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.9Artificial Intelligence 4.3
Loss of industrial capacity7.1 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 108Global funding seizure Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.8
Food and water failure7.9 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 122Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×2.5Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.8
Broad fall in trade and investment8.0 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 153Global funding seizure Extreme + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×3.2Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.8
Broad fall in information and influence8.1 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 121Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×3.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Strategic awareness failure4.0 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 94Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 1.3
Diplomatic isolation8.2 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 141Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Rupture in trade and supply8.2 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 178Global funding seizure Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×4.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.8
Broad fall in human capital7.8 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 154Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.8
Education pipeline failure8.5 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 134Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.8
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure8.1 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 152Breadbasket failure Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.8Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.8
Collapse in energy security6.8 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 120Breadbasket failure Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.8
Defence readiness failure5.0 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 103Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Broad fall in critical technology2.5 Inception— No route · rank 83Already at the foot of the scale×3.8—
Broad fall in national security4.1 Nascent → Inception— Remote · rank 96Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Loss of advanced technology base1.5 Inception— No route · rank 83Already at the foot of the scale×4.2—
Failure of digital lifelines7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 114No route found · closest 2.9 of 3×3.1—
Loss of strategic deterrence1.4 Inception— No route · rank 83Already at the foot of the scale×6.1—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Capable digital government8.8 Foundational → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 67Market access opening Severe + Public service leap Extreme×2.1Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3
Trusted public institutions9.3 Transitional → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 66Market access opening Severe + Public service leap Extreme×2.1Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3
Broad rise in governance and integrity9.4 Transitional → Transitional0.1% Remote · rank 67Market access opening Extreme + Public service leap Extreme×2.5Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3
Secure food and water supply7.9 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 56Market access opening Extreme + Water-efficient food leap Extreme×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.8
Higher-value international business7.6 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 59Market access opening Extreme + Water-efficient food leap Extreme×2.3Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 7.3
Broad rise in critical technology2.5 Inception— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.7—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure8.1 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.2—
Broad rise in national security4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.6—
Broad rise in human capital7.8 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.4—
Broad rise in information and influence8.1 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Broad rise in financial strength7.9 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.2—
Broad rise in production and innovation7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—
Broad rise in trade and investment8.0 Foundational— No route · rank 82No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×2.4—
Assured space services2.4 Inception— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.5—
Frontier AI and compute2.6 Inception— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.1—
Higher-value manufacturing4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.7—
Reliable low-cost energy5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×3.0—
More deployable joint force5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.4—
Adaptable skilled workforce7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.0—
Stronger health and biotechnology6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 87No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.4—
Stronger information environment8.1 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.1—
Wider international influence8.2 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Deeper long-term finance8.4 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.3—
Research translated into value6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.8—
Sophisticated export strength8.0 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×2.9—