Latin America and Caribbean · JAM

Jamaica

Baseline index 6.24Rank 94 of 197FoundationalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Stretched developers. Exposed to food and funding shocks; debt relief and better yields are their upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
20.5
rank 104 of 197 · 3 years: 20.2
Worst case
−12.8%
Regional war spillover · tail −12.2%
Opportunity · 10 years
−5.9
rank 97 of 197 · 3 years: −5.6
Best case
+10
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed
27%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.23
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; public debt relative to gdp; remittances relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Jamaica’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.74−0.80−1.05−0.47022Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.70−0.77−1.05−0.47▲ 125Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.1 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.67−0.72−0.97−0.43▲ 121Artificial Intelligence 0.8 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.68−0.69−0.83−0.37▲ 219Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.5 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.79−0.67−1.00−0.45▼ 120Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.7 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02High 0.75−0.63−0.92−0.41▼ 217Economic Output & Productivity 4 · Nascent
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.53−0.58−0.75−0.34020Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.56−0.52−0.79−0.35019Energy Infrastructure 4.8 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.33−0.37−0.52−0.23▲ 113Energy Infrastructure 5.2 · Nascent
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.39−0.34−0.43−0.19▲ 28Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.7 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.43−1.09−0.89−0.42−0.42−1.05−0.98−0.84−1.08
Severe pandemic−0.68−0.42−0.34−1.01−0.89−0.95−0.89−0.87−0.87
AI labour shock−0.67−0.37·−0.99−0.87−1.02−0.87−0.85−0.85
Cryptographic trust break−0.74−0.51−0.90·−1.13−1.06−0.99−0.42−0.48
Legitimacy rupture−0.37−0.43−0.77−0.40−0.92−1.28−1.05−0.40−0.45
Global funding seizure−0.36−0.42·−0.42−0.38−0.85−1.39−0.98−0.87
Trade bloc rupture−0.61−0.30−0.27−0.30−0.70−0.68−0.70−0.69−0.95
Core disaster−0.03−0.79−0.25−0.63−0.28−0.70−0.75−0.64−0.64
Breadbasket failure−0.19−0.46−0.16−0.43−0.41−0.44−0.47−0.35−0.40
Hybrid coercion−0.25−0.55−0.55·−0.61−0.63·−0.23−0.23
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Jamaica is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+10.215.85.62592Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+8.414.56.13721Energy Infrastructure 5.9 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+1.017.116.02670Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−0.119.719.83468Energy Infrastructure 5.9 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed−1.514.516.020135Energy Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−6.48.414.828152Intelligence & Assessment 4 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed−8.520.128.626121Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−8.810.219.024141Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−14.18.022.116121Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−16.35.421.71080Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Jamaica, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability9.0 Transitional → Foundational2.8% Possible · rank 47Global funding seizure Severe + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 6
Breakdown of state function9.6 Transitional → Foundational2.5% Possible · rank 98Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.3
Broad fall in financial strength8.5 Foundational → Nascent1.6% Possible · rank 52Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Majorplans fail×2.1Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 6
Rupture in trade and supply7.0 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 69Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.0Maritime Power 2.8
Broad fall in governance and integrity9.2 Transitional → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 113Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.3
Rule of law failure9.4 Transitional → Foundational0.6% Unlikely · rank 106Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.3
Breakdown of information trust7.8 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 83Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.3
Broad fall in trade and investment7.0 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 71Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.8Maritime Power 2.8
Broad fall in production and innovation6.3 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 34Global funding seizure Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×3.1Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 6
Health system failure8.8 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 145Global funding seizure Severe + Severe pandemic Extreme×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.6
Loss of industrial capacity6.3 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 96Global funding seizure Extreme + Regional war spillover Majorplans fail×2.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 6
Collapse in energy security4.4 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 87Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 2.8
Broad fall in information and influence6.6 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 103Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.7Quantum Technologies 0.3
Diplomatic isolation5.6 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 113Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.7Quantum Technologies 0.3
Food and water failure7.0 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 168Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.5Social Infrastructure 8
Defence readiness failure3.3 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 81Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.3
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure6.7 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 137Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Maritime Power 2.8
Broad fall in human capital8.1 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 141AI labour shock Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.6
Education pipeline failure9.1 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 138Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.6
Failure of digital lifelines6.8 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 105Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.7Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in critical technology1.2 Inception— No route · rank 95Already at the foot of the scale×4.0—
Broad fall in national security2.5 Inception— No route · rank 103Already at the foot of the scale×3.4—
Loss of advanced technology base0.5 Inception— No route · rank 95Already at the foot of the scale×6.3—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.4 Inception— No route · rank 95Already at the foot of the scale×6.7—
Strategic awareness failure2.5 Inception— No route · rank 106Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology1.2 Inception— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.5—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.2—
Broad rise in national security2.5 Inception— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Broad rise in human capital8.1 Foundational— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.5—
Broad rise in information and influence6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Broad rise in governance and integrity9.2 Transitional— No route · rank 96No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.6—
Broad rise in financial strength8.5 Foundational— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.3—
Broad rise in production and innovation6.3 Foundational— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
Broad rise in trade and investment7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.2—
Assured space services0.9 Inception— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.2—
Frontier AI and compute1.3 Inception— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.0—
Higher-value manufacturing3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.3—
Reliable low-cost energy3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 97No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Secure food and water supply7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 95No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.9—
More deployable joint force3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Adaptable skilled workforce7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Stronger health and biotechnology6.8 Foundational— No route · rank 96No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.0—
Stronger information environment7.7 Foundational— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Wider international influence5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.8—
Capable digital government8.3 Foundational— No route · rank 102No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×2.9—
Trusted public institutions8.8 Foundational— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.9—
Deeper long-term finance8.3 Foundational— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.7—
Research translated into value5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
Higher-value international business7.3 Foundational— No route · rank 95No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.0—
Sophisticated export strength6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.8—