Europe · XKX

Kosovo

Baseline index 4.70Rank 125 of 197NascentEuropeAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
35.8
rank 51 of 197 · 3 years: 35.5
Worst case
−22.8%
Regional war spillover · tail −20.1%
Opportunity · 10 years
−13.1
rank 151 of 197 · 3 years: −13.0
Best case
+14
Clean power threshold · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed
19%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.35
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
3of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Hybrid coercion, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; no coastline; remittances relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population; few months of imports covered by reserves.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Kosovo’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.94−1.07−1.28−0.58▼ 621Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.79−0.92−1.15−0.52▼ 419Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.75−0.85−1.06−0.48▼ 416Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.83−0.83−0.95−0.44▼ 417Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.60−0.70−0.84−0.38▼ 29Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.74−0.64−0.77−0.34▼ 1114Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.60−0.62−0.83−0.36▼ 113Energy Infrastructure 3.5 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02High 0.63−0.61−0.77−0.34013Investment Attraction & Projection 2.5 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.49−0.46−0.62−0.27▲ 48Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.2 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.38−0.46−0.58−0.25▲ 17Monetary & Currency Capability 3.4 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.48−1.53−0.95−0.59−0.59−1.47−1.37−1.18−1.51
Severe pandemic−0.66−0.51−0.37−1.24−1.09−1.17−1.09−1.07−1.07
AI labour shock−0.66−0.44·−1.19−1.04−1.22−1.04−1.02−1.02
Cryptographic trust break−0.72−0.64−0.99·−1.42−1.33−1.24−0.53−0.61
Trade bloc rupture−0.59−0.38−0.30−0.38−0.88−0.85−0.88−0.86−1.18
Hybrid coercion−0.40−1.10−0.88·−1.22−1.26·−0.46−0.46
Core disaster−0.03−0.93−0.27−0.74−0.33−0.83−0.89−0.76−0.76
Global funding seizure−0.30−0.41·−0.41−0.37−0.83−1.36−0.95−0.85
Legitimacy rupture−0.23−0.30−0.49−0.27−0.64−0.89−0.73−0.27−0.31
Breadbasket failure−0.22−0.57−0.18−0.54−0.52−0.55−0.59−0.44−0.50
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Kosovo is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+13.614.20.61567Energy Technologies 1 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+10.512.41.92564Intelligence & Assessment 3.8 · Nascent
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+9.412.73.31795Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−0.78.89.62080Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.4 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−9.25.514.730188Energy Infrastructure 4.9 · Nascent
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−14.53.918.417163Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−17.15.222.412146Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−21.913.235.119179Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−23.813.437.224168Investment Attraction & Projection 4 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−29.96.336.27153Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Kosovo, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function7.8 Foundational → Nascent4.9% Possible · rank 23Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severe×1.7Maritime Power 0
Rupture in trade and supply4.9 Nascent → Inception3.2% Possible · rank 10Regional war spillover Extreme×1.5Maritime Power 0
Loss of financial stability5.6 Nascent → Inception3.1% Possible · rank 33Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×2.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.8
Broad fall in governance and integrity7.5 Foundational → Nascent2.9% Possible · rank 13Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Major×2.0Maritime Power 0
Breakdown of information trust5.4 Nascent → Inception1.8% Possible · rank 9Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.1Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in financial strength5.5 Nascent → Inception1.7% Possible · rank 45Global funding seizure Major + Regional war spillover Extreme×2.2Maritime Power 0
Rule of law failure7.6 Foundational → Nascent1.3% Possible · rank 27Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.1Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in trade and investment4.8 Nascent → Inception1.2% Possible · rank 21Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.0Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in information and influence4.8 Nascent → Inception1.2% Possible · rank 13Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.1Quantum Technologies 0.3
Collapse in energy security3.0 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 31Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Major×1.6Maritime Power 0
Diplomatic isolation4.1 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 20Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.1Quantum Technologies 0.3
Health system failure7.5 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 58Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure5.1 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 24Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extreme×2.0Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 2.7
Loss of industrial capacity4.9 Nascent → Inception0.7% Unlikely · rank 21Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×2.5Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in production and innovation5.0 Nascent → Inception0.5% Unlikely · rank 31Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Food and water failure6.0 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 76Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.5Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 2.7
Failure of digital lifelines5.1 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 67Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 2.7
Broad fall in human capital6.8 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 66Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Education pipeline failure7.7 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 71Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Broad fall in critical technology0.8 Inception— No route · rank 126Already at the foot of the scale×4.2—
Broad fall in national security2.1 Inception— No route · rank 132Already at the foot of the scale×3.0—
Loss of advanced technology base0.3 Inception— No route · rank 126Already at the foot of the scale×9.4—
Defence readiness failure2.4 Inception— No route · rank 144Already at the foot of the scale×3.9—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.6 Inception— No route · rank 126Already at the foot of the scale×5.4—
Strategic awareness failure2.3 Inception— No route · rank 131Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.8 Inception— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.4—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.9—
Broad rise in national security2.1 Inception— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.3—
Broad rise in human capital6.8 Foundational— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.7—
Broad rise in information and influence4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.0—
Broad rise in governance and integrity7.5 Foundational— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.6—
Broad rise in financial strength5.5 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.0—
Broad rise in production and innovation5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.5—
Broad rise in trade and investment4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.8—
Assured space services0.6 Inception— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.0—
Frontier AI and compute0.8 Inception— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.0—
Higher-value manufacturing2.7 Inception— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.0—
Reliable low-cost energy2.9 Inception— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.5—
Secure food and water supply6.0 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.0—
More deployable joint force2.2 Inception— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.1—
Adaptable skilled workforce6.0 Foundational— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.0—
Stronger health and biotechnology5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.5—
Stronger information environment5.5 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.9—
Wider international influence4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.8—
Capable digital government7.4 Foundational— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.6—
Trusted public institutions7.1 Foundational— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.6—
Deeper long-term finance5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.6—
Research translated into value4.4 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.0—
Higher-value international business5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.5—
Sophisticated export strength4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 125No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.6—