Indo-Pacific · MHL

Marshall Islands

Baseline index 2.48Rank 181 of 197InceptionIndo-PacificAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Acute fragility. Every scenario is severe; there is little capability left to lose. One of 14 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
63.6
rank 13 of 197 · 3 years: 63.1
Worst case
−39.7%
Regional war spillover · tail −38.0%
Opportunity · 10 years
−16.2
rank 169 of 197 · 3 years: −15.9
Best case
+4
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
11%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.36
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Hybrid coercion. Highest exposure indicators: adult obesity rate; remittances relative to gdp; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; urban share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Marshall Islands’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.92−0.98−1.09−0.51▼ 315Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.78−0.93−1.02−0.46▼ 313Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.77−0.92−1.03−0.46▼ 414Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.81−0.73−0.77−0.37▼ 29Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.61−0.69−0.82−0.36013Industrial & Sectoral Base 0.2 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.55−0.62−0.70−0.31▼ 28Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.64−0.60−0.73−0.33▲ 29Force Generation & Mobilisation 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.56−0.59−0.66−0.29▲ 18Economic Output & Productivity 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.70−0.57−0.62−0.30▼ 29Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.28−0.35−0.41−0.18▲ 69Monetary & Currency Capability 1.6 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.11−1.31−0.41−0.62−0.62−1.55−1.45−1.20−1.59
AI labour shock−0.11−0.52·−1.40−1.22−1.45−1.23−1.20−1.21
Severe pandemic−0.11−0.56−0.27−1.35−1.18−1.27−1.18−1.16−1.16
Cryptographic trust break−0.11−0.66−0.40·−1.48−1.41−1.27−0.56−0.65
Core disaster−0.04−1.01−0.22−0.85−0.38−0.95−1.01−0.87−0.87
Trade bloc rupture−0.11−0.37−0.21−0.37−0.86−0.83−0.86−0.84−1.15
Legitimacy rupture−0.11−0.43−0.36−0.40−0.92−1.28−1.05−0.40−0.45
Global funding seizure−0.11−0.41·−0.41−0.37−0.83−1.36−0.95−0.85
Hybrid coercion−0.11−1.05−0.41·−1.27−1.31·−0.48−0.48
Breadbasket failure−0.07−0.45−0.10−0.43−0.41−0.44−0.47−0.35−0.40
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Marshall Islands is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+3.97.73.810116Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−4.14.38.517156Energy Infrastructure 2.4 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−7.910.718.714103Investment Attraction & Projection 2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−8.94.213.212159Intelligence & Assessment 0.8 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−12.06.618.610155Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−14.33.217.57162Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−16.64.020.67162Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−24.31.625.92127Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−24.56.931.59185Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−28.64.132.68179Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Marshall Islands, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function5.5 Nascent → Inception5.9% Likely · rank 13Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×1.6Resource Infrastructure 0.5
Broad fall in governance and integrity4.9 Nascent → Inception4.3% Possible · rank 5Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.9Quantum Technologies 0
Rupture in trade and supply4.3 Nascent → Inception3.0% Possible · rank 19Regional war spillover Extreme×1.4Resource Infrastructure 0.5
Rule of law failure4.8 Nascent → Inception1.6% Possible · rank 15Regional war spillover Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.0Quantum Technologies 0
Health system failure5.0 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 67Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0
Diplomatic isolation3.3 Nascent → Inception0.5% Unlikely · rank 64Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.0Quantum Technologies 0
Food and water failure3.3 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 84Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.4Resource Infrastructure 0.5
Education pipeline failure4.7 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 65Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0
Broad fall in trade and investment3.2 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 164Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.9Resource Infrastructure 0.5
Broad fall in human capital3.9 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 165AI labour shock Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0
Breakdown of information trust3.0 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 169Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2.3
Broad fall in critical technology0.1 Inception— No route · rank 181Already at the foot of the scale×27—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure2.4 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Broad fall in national security0.4 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale×7.3—
Broad fall in information and influence2.9 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale×2.0—
Broad fall in financial strength2.7 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Broad fall in production and innovation1.9 Inception— No route · rank 181Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 181Already at the foot of the scale——
Collapse in energy security1.1 Inception— No route · rank 181Already at the foot of the scale×2.7—
Failure of digital lifelines1.9 Inception— No route · rank 181Already at the foot of the scale×2.8—
Defence readiness failure0.5 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×6.3—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 181Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Strategic awareness failure0.4 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale×7.8—
Loss of financial stability2.8 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Loss of industrial capacity1.8 Inception— No route · rank 181Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.1 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure2.4 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.8—
Broad rise in national security0.4 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×22—
Broad rise in human capital3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.4—
Broad rise in information and influence2.9 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Broad rise in governance and integrity4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.5—
Broad rise in financial strength2.7 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×12—
Broad rise in production and innovation1.9 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.3—
Broad rise in trade and investment3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.0—
Assured space services0.3 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Higher-value manufacturing0.8 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Reliable low-cost energy1.4 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.5—
Secure food and water supply3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.3—
More deployable joint force0.6 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×24—
Adaptable skilled workforce2.8 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.5—
Stronger health and biotechnology3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.8—
Stronger information environment2.4 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.7—
Wider international influence3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Capable digital government3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.0—
Trusted public institutions4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.5—
Deeper long-term finance2.5 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Research translated into value1.3 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.3—
Higher-value international business2.1 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×5.6—
Sophisticated export strength2.1 Inception— No route · rank 181No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.0—