Indo-Pacific · FSM

Micronesia

Baseline index 2.33Rank 182 of 197InceptionIndo-PacificAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Acute fragility. Every scenario is severe; there is little capability left to lose. One of 14 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
66.6
rank 11 of 197 · 3 years: 66.1
Worst case
−42.7%
Regional war spillover · tail −38.5%
Opportunity · 10 years
−12.2
rank 142 of 197 · 3 years: −11.6
Best case
+4
Middle East settlement · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
11%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.35
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
3of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Breadbasket failure, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; staple foods among the top five imports; adult obesity rate; low real gdp per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Micronesia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.93−0.99−1.09−0.52▼ 316Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06High 0.67−0.85−0.97−0.43▼ 115Monetary & Currency Capability 0.6 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.70−0.84−0.92−0.41▼ 513Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.58−0.70−0.79−0.35▼ 212Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.72−0.66−0.69−0.33▼ 210Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.57−0.64−0.71−0.32▼ 413Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.67−0.62−0.75−0.34▲ 212Force Generation & Mobilisation 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.50−0.57−0.67−0.30013Industrial & Sectoral Base 0.8 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.57−0.47−0.51−0.24▼ 27Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.36−0.39−0.43−0.19▲ 39Economic Output & Productivity 0.5 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.11−1.31−0.41−0.63−0.63−1.56−1.46−1.22−1.61
Breadbasket failure−0.11−1.05−0.24−1.08−1.03−1.10−1.18−0.88−1.01
AI labour shock−0.11−0.46·−1.27−1.11−1.31−1.11−1.09−1.09
Severe pandemic−0.11−0.42−0.22−1.02−0.89−0.96−0.89−0.88−0.88
Cryptographic trust break−0.11−0.58−0.38·−1.34−1.25−1.17−0.50−0.57
Trade bloc rupture−0.11−0.38−0.22−0.38−0.90−0.86−0.90−0.88−1.18
Legitimacy rupture−0.11−0.45−0.36−0.41−0.96−1.34−1.10−0.41−0.47
Core disaster−0.03−0.83−0.19−0.69−0.31−0.78−0.83−0.71−0.71
Hybrid coercion−0.11−0.85−0.41·−1.03−1.06·−0.39−0.39
Global funding seizure−0.07−0.27·−0.27−0.25−0.55−0.90−0.63−0.56
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Micronesia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+3.65.82.21299Intelligence & Assessment 0.8 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+3.45.42.07115Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+0.94.83.99146Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−6.02.58.618173Energy Infrastructure 2.6 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−8.08.116.112105Investment Attraction & Projection 1.7 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−11.76.918.610149Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−12.15.517.67156Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−22.61.424.02113Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−24.86.731.69186Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−33.93.537.36191Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Micronesia, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function5.5 Nascent → Inception5.6% Likely · rank 19Regional war spillover Extreme×1.6Resource Infrastructure 0.5
Broad fall in governance and integrity4.9 Nascent → Inception2.4% Possible · rank 23Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Major×1.9Resource Infrastructure 0.5
Rule of law failure4.8 Nascent → Inception1.3% Possible · rank 28Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Health system failure5.0 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 34Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0
Education pipeline failure4.6 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 44Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.5Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.6
Diplomatic isolation3.2 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 129Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.3Quantum Technologies 0
Broad fall in human capital3.8 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 121Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Extreme×2.4Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.6
Broad fall in critical technology0.1 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale×27—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure2.3 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Broad fall in national security0.4 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×7.3—
Broad fall in information and influence2.7 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Broad fall in financial strength2.5 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Broad fall in production and innovation1.9 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Broad fall in trade and investment2.3 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale——
Collapse in energy security1.2 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Failure of digital lifelines1.9 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale×3.1—
Food and water failure3.0 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×1.7—
Defence readiness failure0.5 Inception— No route · rank 185Already at the foot of the scale×6.3—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Strategic awareness failure0.4 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×7.8—
Breakdown of information trust2.9 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×2.2—
Loss of financial stability2.7 Inception— No route · rank 185Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Loss of industrial capacity1.9 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Rupture in trade and supply2.8 Inception— No route · rank 182Already at the foot of the scale×1.4—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.1 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×13—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure2.3 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Broad rise in national security0.4 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×16—
Broad rise in human capital3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Broad rise in information and influence2.7 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Broad rise in governance and integrity4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.9—
Broad rise in financial strength2.5 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Broad rise in production and innovation1.9 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Broad rise in trade and investment2.3 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.9—
Assured space services0.3 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×19—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Higher-value manufacturing0.8 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×16—
Reliable low-cost energy1.5 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.3—
Secure food and water supply3.0 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.1—
More deployable joint force0.6 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×17—
Adaptable skilled workforce2.8 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.9—
Stronger health and biotechnology3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.0—
Stronger information environment2.3 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Wider international influence3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Capable digital government3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.3—
Trusted public institutions4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.3—
Deeper long-term finance2.3 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Research translated into value1.3 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Higher-value international business1.8 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.4—
Sophisticated export strength1.9 Inception— No route · rank 182No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.3—