Europe · MCO

Monaco

Baseline index 5.91Rank 101 of 197NascentEuropeAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
29.2
rank 76 of 197 · 3 years: 28.9
Worst case
−17.4%
Regional war spillover · tail −16.5%
Opportunity · 10 years
−7.6
rank 107 of 197 · 3 years: −7.3
Best case
+21
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed
26%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.31
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
7of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Advanced Materials & Manufacturing
weakest point in 1 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Hybrid coercion, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: urban share of population; share of population aged 65 and over; internet users as a share of population; services as a share of gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Monaco’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 1.00−1.03−1.26−0.58▼ 818Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 1.00−0.98−1.41−0.64▼ 521Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.95−0.92−1.31−0.60▼ 417Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.97−0.85−1.03−0.50▼ 416Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 1.00−0.83−1.21−0.54▼ 718Economic Output & Productivity 3.5 · Nascent
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.70−0.73−0.94−0.43▼ 414Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.80−0.66−0.78−0.36▼ 713Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.47−0.38−0.58−0.26▲ 511Force Generation & Mobilisation 0.7 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.38−0.30−0.52−0.23▲ 611Energy Infrastructure 3.1 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.28−0.29−0.42−0.19▲ 69Agriculture & Food Infrastructure 1.7 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.42−1.31−0.60−0.61−0.61−1.52−1.42−1.22−1.57
Severe pandemic−0.59−0.53−0.33−1.36−1.19−1.27−1.19−1.17−1.17
AI labour shock−0.63−0.46·−1.30−1.14−1.34−1.14−1.12−1.12
Cryptographic trust break−0.61−0.66−0.78·−1.54−1.44−1.34−0.58−0.66
Global funding seizure−0.36−0.53·−0.57−0.51−1.15−1.87−1.31−1.16
Trade bloc rupture−0.54−0.39−0.27−0.40−0.94−0.91−0.94−0.92−1.27
Hybrid coercion−0.41−1.09−0.73·−1.33−1.37·−0.50−0.50
Legitimacy rupture−0.18−0.26−0.35−0.23−0.54−0.76−0.62−0.23−0.27
Core disaster−0.02−0.45−0.12−0.37−0.17−0.41−0.44−0.38−0.38
Breadbasket failure−0.13−0.37−0.10−0.35−0.33−0.36−0.38−0.29−0.33
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Monaco is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+21.223.72.42558Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+9.710.20.51682Resource Infrastructure 0.3 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+6.78.31.62481Intelligence & Assessment 2 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−3.54.17.62592Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−11.78.019.728126Energy Infrastructure 3.8 · Nascent
Debt service reset S11 ↗Loser−12.30.012.434194Energy Infrastructure 3.8 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−12.48.921.41071Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−14.623.738.227153Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−14.87.922.713129Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−15.21.616.822169Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Monaco, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function11.6 Transitional → Foundational7.7% Likely · rank 6Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severe×1.6Resource Infrastructure 0.3
Loss of financial stability8.1 Foundational → Nascent6.5% Likely · rank 1Global funding seizure Severeplans fail×1.5Monetary & Currency Capability 6
Broad fall in governance and integrity10.6 Transitional → Foundational5.0% Likely · rank 3Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.0Quantum Technologies 0
Rupture in trade and supply6.1 Foundational → Inception3.8% Possible · rank 2Regional war spillover Extreme×1.4Resource Infrastructure 0.3
Broad fall in financial strength8.0 Foundational → Nascent3.2% Possible · rank 4Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severe×1.6Monetary & Currency Capability 6
Rule of law failure9.9 Transitional → Foundational2.7% Possible · rank 2Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.9Quantum Technologies 0
Broad fall in trade and investment6.5 Foundational → Nascent2.5% Possible · rank 3Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×1.9Resource Infrastructure 0.3
Breakdown of information trust5.9 Nascent → Inception2.2% Possible · rank 3Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×1.9Quantum Technologies 0
Diplomatic isolation4.2 Nascent → Inception2.0% Possible · rank 2Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.9Quantum Technologies 0
Loss of industrial capacity5.8 Nascent → Inception1.9% Possible · rank 2Global funding seizure Severe + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.1Monetary & Currency Capability 6
Broad fall in production and innovation7.0 Foundational → Nascent1.9% Possible · rank 1Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×2.3Monetary & Currency Capability 6
Broad fall in information and influence4.1 Nascent → Inception1.8% Possible · rank 2Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.9Quantum Technologies 0
Health system failure13.2 Established → Transitional1.4% Possible · rank 19Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×1.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Broad fall in human capital10.0 Transitional → Foundational1.1% Possible · rank 1AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.2Artificial Intelligence 1.7
Education pipeline failure10.1 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 4Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Failure of digital lifelines6.7 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 63Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.3Intelligence & Assessment 2
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure5.6 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 138Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.3Resource Infrastructure 0.3
Food and water failure6.9 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 181Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.5Resource Infrastructure 0.3
Broad fall in critical technology0.7 Inception— No route · rank 102Already at the foot of the scale×4.8—
Broad fall in national security0.8 Inception— No route · rank 109Already at the foot of the scale×3.9—
Loss of advanced technology base0.2 Inception— No route · rank 102Already at the foot of the scale×14—
Collapse in energy security1.5 Inception— No route · rank 130Already at the foot of the scale×2.7—
Defence readiness failure0.7 Inception— No route · rank 130Already at the foot of the scale×5.4—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 102Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Strategic awareness failure1.6 Inception— No route · rank 109Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology9.2 Transitional → Transitional0.3% Unlikely · rank 71Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Capable digital government11.1 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 84Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×3.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Broad rise in critical technology0.7 Inception— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.8—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.8—
Broad rise in national security0.8 Inception— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.4—
Broad rise in human capital10.0 Transitional— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.8—
Broad rise in information and influence4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×3.6—
Broad rise in governance and integrity10.6 Transitional— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×3.1—
Broad rise in financial strength8.0 Foundational— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×3.6—
Broad rise in production and innovation7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.2—
Broad rise in trade and investment6.5 Foundational— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.7—
Assured space services0.4 Inception— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.8—
Frontier AI and compute0.9 Inception— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.2—
Higher-value manufacturing2.3 Inception— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.2—
Reliable low-cost energy2.2 Inception— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.2—
Secure food and water supply6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.2—
More deployable joint force0.8 Inception— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.4—
Adaptable skilled workforce9.1 Transitional— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.2—
Stronger information environment4.0 Nascent— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.2—
Wider international influence4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.2—
Trusted public institutions9.6 Transitional— No route · rank 105No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.4—
Deeper long-term finance7.9 Foundational— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.8—
Research translated into value6.3 Foundational— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.2—
Higher-value international business8.1 Foundational— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.2—
Sophisticated export strength5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.2—