Gulf and Middle East · OMN

Oman

Baseline index 8.03Rank 68 of 197FoundationalGulf and Middle EastAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Low vulnerability, and gains from open markets and digital public services. One of 39 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
15.2
rank 134 of 197 · 3 years: 14.8
Worst case
−10.1%
Cryptographic trust break · tail −8.9%
Opportunity · 10 years
−5.8
rank 96 of 197 · 3 years: −6.0
Best case
+15
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed
34%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.18
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Trade bloc rupture, AI labour shock, Breadbasket failure. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; industry as a share of gdp; internet users as a share of population; little renewable water per head; urban share of population; adult obesity rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Oman’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.85−0.81−1.07−0.47▼ 121Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.1 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.72−0.68−1.06−0.47▼ 124Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.65−0.65−0.97−0.42021Artificial Intelligence 2 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.64−0.65−0.98−0.43▼ 122Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.5 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.62−0.60−0.80−0.35▲ 125Political Institutions & Civic Participation 2.9 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.56−0.52−0.89−0.39▲ 119Energy Infrastructure 6.5 · Foundational
Regional war spillover S03Medium 0.50−0.45−0.72−0.32▲ 317Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 5.1 · Nascent
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.59−0.45−0.66−0.29013Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.57−0.44−0.71−0.31019Labour & Employment 6.9 · Foundational
Core disaster S07Medium 0.43−0.35−0.60−0.26▲ 217Energy Infrastructure 6.7 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Cryptographic trust break−1.02−0.57−1.05·−1.28−1.20−1.12−0.48−0.55
Trade bloc rupture−0.83−0.35−0.31−0.35−0.81−0.78−0.81−0.79−1.09
AI labour shock−0.72−0.33·−0.88−0.77−0.91−0.77−0.75−0.75
Severe pandemic−0.69−0.35−0.28−0.84−0.73−0.78−0.73−0.72−0.72
Legitimacy rupture−0.35−0.38−0.69−0.35−0.81−1.13−0.92−0.35−0.40
Breadbasket failure−0.27−0.65−0.22−0.61−0.58−0.62−0.67−0.50−0.57
Regional war spillover−0.25−0.60−0.55−0.23−0.23−0.57−0.54−0.46−0.59
Hybrid coercion−0.34−0.73−0.73·−0.82−0.84·−0.31−0.31
Global funding seizure−0.26−0.29·−0.29−0.26−0.59−0.96−0.68−0.60
Core disaster−0.02−0.53−0.17−0.42−0.19−0.47−0.50−0.43−0.43
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Oman is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+15.319.64.33172Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+13.423.39.93246Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Gainer+11.414.12.83133Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−0.414.615.02349Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−2.026.928.94376Energy Infrastructure 7.5 · Foundational
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−2.94.77.637140Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 5 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−6.625.732.341154Justice System & Fundamental Rights 6.8 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−6.612.619.329110Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−15.78.924.61478Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−41.710.352.030171Energy Technologies 2.8 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Oman, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function9.7 Transitional → Foundational1.8% Possible · rank 143Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 1
Loss of financial stability10.1 Transitional → Foundational1.2% Possible · rank 142Global funding seizure Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 9
Broad fall in governance and integrity8.4 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Possible · rank 118Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in financial strength9.9 Transitional → Foundational0.9% Unlikely · rank 121Global funding seizure Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 9
Breakdown of information trust6.0 Nascent → Inception0.9% Unlikely · rank 59Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.4Quantum Technologies 1
Diplomatic isolation8.7 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 37Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in information and influence7.2 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 63Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.4Quantum Technologies 1
Strategic awareness failure5.3 Nascent → Inception0.6% Unlikely · rank 64Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×1.9Quantum Technologies 1
Rule of law failure6.6 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 120Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.4Quantum Technologies 1
Health system failure11.5 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 116Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8
Rupture in trade and supply10.0 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 140Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×3.1Structural Transformation & Complexity 8.3
Broad fall in trade and investment9.2 Transitional → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 115Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.8Structural Transformation & Complexity 8.3
Collapse in energy security7.9 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 104Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.9Energy Infrastructure 7.5
Food and water failure11.7 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 141Trade bloc rupture Major + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×3.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 9
Loss of industrial capacity8.8 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 126Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×3.8Structural Transformation & Complexity 8.3
Broad fall in production and innovation8.2 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 114Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×3.8Structural Transformation & Complexity 8.3
Defence readiness failure9.6 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 67Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.1Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in national security6.9 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 61Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.9Quantum Technologies 1
Failure of digital lifelines8.9 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 75Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.4Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in human capital9.9 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 99Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8
Education pipeline failure10.4 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 112Breadbasket failure Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.6Artificial Intelligence 3.3
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure10.4 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 145Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×4.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.3
Broad fall in critical technology2.0 Inception— No route · rank 70Already at the foot of the scale×2.9—
Loss of advanced technology base1.2 Inception— No route · rank 70Already at the foot of the scale×3.4—
Loss of strategic deterrence2.9 Inception— No route · rank 72Already at the foot of the scale×4.7—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in governance and integrity8.4 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 68Market access opening Extreme + Middle East settlement Extreme×2.8Justice System & Fundamental Rights 6.8
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure10.4 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 55Market access opening Extreme + Middle East settlement Extreme×3.0Justice System & Fundamental Rights 6.8
Broad rise in trade and investment9.2 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 55Market access opening Extreme + Great-power détente Extreme×2.4Energy Infrastructure 7.5
Reliable low-cost energy5.2 Nascent → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 63Market access opening Extreme + Middle East settlement Extreme×2.6Justice System & Fundamental Rights 6.8
Stronger health and biotechnology8.6 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 75Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8
Capable digital government11.0 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 77Market access opening Extreme + Middle East settlement Extreme×2.8Energy Infrastructure 7.5
Trusted public institutions7.2 Foundational → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 76Market access opening Extreme + Middle East settlement Extreme×3.0Energy Infrastructure 7.5
Higher-value international business8.7 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 52Market access opening Extreme + Great-power détente Extreme×2.2Energy Infrastructure 7.5
Sophisticated export strength8.4 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 51Market access opening Extreme + Great-power détente Extreme×2.8Energy Infrastructure 7.5
Wider international influence8.7 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 52Great-power détente Extreme + Middle East settlement Extreme×2.3Justice System & Fundamental Rights 6.8
Broad rise in critical technology2.0 Inception— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.9—
Broad rise in national security6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.5—
Broad rise in human capital9.9 Transitional— No route · rank 69No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.4—
Broad rise in information and influence7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 69No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.9—
Broad rise in financial strength9.9 Transitional— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.7—
Broad rise in production and innovation8.2 Foundational— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.7—
Assured space services2.5 Inception— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.8—
Frontier AI and compute2.0 Inception— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.3—
Higher-value manufacturing5.5 Nascent— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.0—
Secure food and water supply11.7 Transitional— No route · rank 77No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
More deployable joint force9.0 Foundational— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.9—
Adaptable skilled workforce8.7 Foundational— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.0—
Stronger information environment5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.8—
Deeper long-term finance10.3 Transitional— No route · rank 69No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.9—
Research translated into value7.5 Foundational— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.7—