Indo-Pacific · PLW

Palau

Baseline index 2.84Rank 177 of 197InceptionIndo-PacificAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile and exposed. Highly vulnerable importers of fuel, finance and food. One of 35 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
51.5
rank 20 of 197 · 3 years: 51.1
Worst case
−32.3%
Severe pandemic · tail −30.6%
Opportunity · 10 years
−17.0
rank 171 of 197 · 3 years: −16.6
Best case
+4
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
13%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.32
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: adult obesity rate; public debt relative to gdp; urban share of population; services as a share of gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Palau’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Severe pandemic S10High 0.78−0.92−1.05−0.47▼ 220Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03High 0.84−0.90−1.00−0.47▼ 218Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.69−0.80−0.91−0.41▼ 119Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.68−0.69−0.79−0.35013Economic Output & Productivity 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.61−0.68−0.83−0.37▲ 418Industrial & Sectoral Base 0.8 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.69−0.62−0.67−0.32013Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.51−0.57−0.65−0.29▲ 410Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.63−0.52−0.57−0.27▼ 29Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.52−0.47−0.59−0.27▲ 108Force Generation & Mobilisation 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.28−0.35−0.41−0.18▲ 108Energy Infrastructure 1.9 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Severe pandemic−0.11−0.54−0.29−1.35−1.18−1.27−1.19−1.16−1.16
Regional war spillover−0.11−1.18−0.48−0.55−0.55−1.38−1.29−1.09−1.42
AI labour shock−0.11−0.44·−1.21−1.06−1.25−1.06−1.04−1.04
Global funding seizure−0.11−0.48·−0.49−0.44−0.99−1.62−1.10−1.01
Core disaster−0.04−0.98−0.22−0.83−0.37−0.93−1.00−0.85−0.85
Cryptographic trust break−0.11−0.55−0.40·−1.26−1.18−1.10−0.47−0.54
Trade bloc rupture−0.11−0.34−0.20−0.34−0.79−0.76−0.79−0.77−1.06
Hybrid coercion−0.11−0.93−0.47·−1.13−1.16·−0.42−0.42
Legitimacy rupture−0.09−0.33−0.34−0.30−0.71−0.98−0.81−0.30−0.35
Breadbasket failure−0.07−0.46−0.11−0.43−0.41−0.44−0.47−0.36−0.41
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Palau is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+3.97.63.710115Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−2.06.38.320124Energy Infrastructure 2.6 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−6.44.310.813153Intelligence & Assessment 0.7 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−9.67.917.514114Investment Attraction & Projection 2 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−10.66.317.012136Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−11.84.616.48156Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−13.93.317.29161Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−22.71.624.33115Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−30.43.533.87183Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−34.88.743.510195Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Palau, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function6.7 Foundational → Nascent4.1% Possible · rank 33Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severe×1.8Resource Infrastructure 0.5
Rupture in trade and supply3.3 Nascent → Inception3.1% Possible · rank 16Regional war spillover Extreme×1.6Resource Infrastructure 0.5
Loss of financial stability3.3 Nascent → Inception2.4% Possible · rank 67Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severe×1.7Financial Stability & Crisis Management 2.3
Broad fall in governance and integrity6.1 Foundational → Nascent2.3% Possible · rank 26Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.2Resource Infrastructure 0.5
Broad fall in financial strength3.1 Nascent → Inception1.0% Possible · rank 111Global funding seizure Extreme + Regional war spillover Major×1.9Financial Stability & Crisis Management 2.3
Health system failure6.3 Foundational → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 71Global funding seizure Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0
Rule of law failure6.2 Foundational → Nascent0.7% Unlikely · rank 91Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.4Quantum Technologies 0
Food and water failure3.7 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 143Hybrid coercion Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.7Financial System Depth & Access 3.6
Diplomatic isolation3.3 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 134Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.4Quantum Technologies 0
Broad fall in human capital5.0 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 164AI labour shock Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0
Education pipeline failure6.0 Foundational → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 151AI labour shock Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0
Broad fall in critical technology0.1 Inception— No route · rank 177Already at the foot of the scale×27—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure2.7 Inception— No route · rank 180Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Broad fall in national security0.5 Inception— No route · rank 178Already at the foot of the scale×6.3—
Broad fall in information and influence2.8 Inception— No route · rank 178Already at the foot of the scale×2.4—
Broad fall in production and innovation2.4 Inception— No route · rank 177Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Broad fall in trade and investment2.9 Inception— No route · rank 179Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 177Already at the foot of the scale——
Collapse in energy security1.2 Inception— No route · rank 177Already at the foot of the scale×2.9—
Failure of digital lifelines2.3 Inception— No route · rank 177Already at the foot of the scale×3.1—
Defence readiness failure0.6 Inception— No route · rank 181Already at the foot of the scale×5.0—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 177Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Strategic awareness failure0.4 Inception— No route · rank 178Already at the foot of the scale×6.7—
Breakdown of information trust3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 179No route found · closest 2.9 of 3×2.2—
Loss of industrial capacity2.3 Inception— No route · rank 179Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.1 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure2.7 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Broad rise in national security0.5 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×21—
Broad rise in human capital5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Broad rise in information and influence2.8 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Broad rise in governance and integrity6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.2—
Broad rise in financial strength3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.8—
Broad rise in production and innovation2.4 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×13—
Broad rise in trade and investment2.9 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.1—
Assured space services0.3 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Higher-value manufacturing0.9 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Reliable low-cost energy1.5 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×10—
Secure food and water supply3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×13—
More deployable joint force0.7 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×23—
Adaptable skilled workforce3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Stronger health and biotechnology4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.9—
Stronger information environment2.3 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.9—
Wider international influence3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Capable digital government4.5 Nascent— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.9—
Trusted public institutions5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.9—
Deeper long-term finance2.9 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×13—
Research translated into value1.7 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×13—
Higher-value international business2.7 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.6—
Sophisticated export strength2.3 Inception— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.5—