Latin America and Caribbean · PAN

Panama

Baseline index 7.17Rank 80 of 197FoundationalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
16.2
rank 125 of 197 · 3 years: 16.0
Worst case
−10.9%
Regional war spillover · tail −10.4%
Opportunity · 10 years
−2.8
rank 79 of 197 · 3 years: −2.7
Best case
+16
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed
31%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.19
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
9of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Monetary & Currency Capability
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Panama’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.75−0.78−1.07−0.48014Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.72−0.75−1.09−0.49013Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.7 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.69−0.70−1.01−0.45010Artificial Intelligence 1.9 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.68−0.68−0.85−0.38▲ 212Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.64−0.55−0.83−0.36▲ 19Force Generation & Mobilisation 3.1 · Nascent
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.54−0.54−0.78−0.35▲ 18Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.62−0.52−0.78−0.34▲ 28Monetary & Currency Capability 5.4 · Nascent
Core disaster S07Medium 0.49−0.42−0.68−0.30▲ 17Industrial & Sectoral Base 7.1 · Foundational
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.40−0.33−0.44−0.19▲ 38Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.7 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.32−0.30−0.50−0.22▲ 43Monetary & Currency Capability 6.1 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.44−1.06−0.88−0.41−0.41−1.02−0.95−0.82−1.05
Severe pandemic−0.72−0.41−0.33−0.98−0.86−0.92−0.86−0.84−0.84
AI labour shock−0.70−0.36·−0.95−0.83−0.98−0.83−0.81−0.81
Cryptographic trust break−0.79−0.49−0.89·−1.09−1.02−0.96−0.41−0.47
Legitimacy rupture−0.32−0.35−0.64−0.32−0.74−1.04−0.85−0.32−0.36
Trade bloc rupture−0.63−0.28−0.25−0.28−0.65−0.63−0.65−0.64−0.87
Global funding seizure−0.31−0.34·−0.34−0.31−0.70−1.14−0.80−0.71
Core disaster−0.02−0.63−0.20−0.50−0.22−0.56−0.60−0.51−0.51
Hybrid coercion−0.25−0.54−0.54·−0.60−0.62·−0.23−0.23
Breadbasket failure−0.16−0.38−0.13−0.36−0.34−0.36−0.39−0.29−0.33
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Panama is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+15.520.44.93170Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+9.118.29.12389Energy Technologies 1.4 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+1.57.05.44577Energy Infrastructure 8.1 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+1.311.29.935112Intelligence & Assessment 5 · Nascent
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+0.926.625.74666Technical & Vocational Skills 8 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−0.814.715.62881Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed−3.122.825.93197Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−8.27.916.030138Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−8.310.318.62384Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−17.46.523.91386Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Panama, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function10.3 Transitional → Foundational1.6% Possible · rank 154Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.5Maritime Power 3.8
Loss of financial stability9.0 Transitional → Nascent1.3% Possible · rank 131Global funding seizure Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Monetary & Currency Capability 6.7
Rupture in trade and supply12.0 Transitional → Foundational1.1% Possible · rank 76Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 3.8
Broad fall in governance and integrity9.7 Transitional → Foundational1.0% Possible · rank 119Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.9Maritime Power 3.8
Broad fall in financial strength9.0 Transitional → Foundational1.0% Possible · rank 109Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.6Monetary & Currency Capability 6.7
Breakdown of information trust7.0 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 89Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.3
Broad fall in trade and investment10.6 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 85Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.9Maritime Power 3.8
Rule of law failure9.5 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 147Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.3
Broad fall in production and innovation7.9 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 78Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.2
Loss of industrial capacity7.8 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 94Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.2
Collapse in energy security4.9 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 92Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 3.8
Health system failure10.5 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Unlikely · rank 173Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.2
Broad fall in information and influence5.8 Nascent → Inception0.2% Unlikely · rank 105Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 0.5
Diplomatic isolation6.0 Foundational → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 117Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 0.5
Strategic awareness failure3.2 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 90Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.5
Defence readiness failure3.1 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 79Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.3
Broad fall in human capital9.0 Transitional → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 140AI labour shock Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.2
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure8.4 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 146Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Maritime Power 3.8
Food and water failure9.3 Transitional → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 183Regional war spillover Extreme + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×3.7Maritime Power 3.8
Education pipeline failure9.4 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 133Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.2
Failure of digital lifelines8.0 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 102Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 0.5
Broad fall in critical technology1.5 Inception— No route · rank 82Already at the foot of the scale×3.8—
Broad fall in national security2.5 Inception— No route · rank 95Already at the foot of the scale×3.4—
Loss of advanced technology base0.7 Inception— No route · rank 82Already at the foot of the scale×4.9—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.6 Inception— No route · rank 82Already at the foot of the scale×6.0—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Reliable low-cost energy4.8 Nascent → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 66Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.8Energy Technologies 1.4
Stronger health and biotechnology8.1 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 82Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.2
Capable digital government10.0 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 79Market access opening Extreme + Public service leap Extreme×2.8Technical & Vocational Skills 8
Trusted public institutions9.2 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 78Market access opening Extreme + Public service leap Extreme×3.0Technical & Vocational Skills 8
Higher-value international business9.6 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 58Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.3Technical & Vocational Skills 8
Broad rise in trade and investment10.6 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 70Market access opening Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.4Technical & Vocational Skills 8
Broad rise in critical technology1.5 Inception— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.0—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure8.4 Foundational— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.1—
Broad rise in national security2.5 Inception— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.1—
Broad rise in human capital9.0 Transitional— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.4—
Broad rise in information and influence5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.2—
Broad rise in governance and integrity9.7 Transitional— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×3.0—
Broad rise in financial strength9.0 Transitional— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—
Broad rise in production and innovation7.9 Foundational— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.8—
Assured space services1.0 Inception— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.6—
Frontier AI and compute1.9 Inception— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.4—
Higher-value manufacturing4.4 Nascent— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.9—
Secure food and water supply9.3 Transitional— No route · rank 84No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—
More deployable joint force3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.9—
Adaptable skilled workforce8.1 Foundational— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.0—
Stronger information environment5.5 Nascent— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.7—
Wider international influence6.0 Foundational— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.9—
Deeper long-term finance9.8 Transitional— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.4—
Research translated into value6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—
Sophisticated export strength10.0 Transitional— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.8—