Indo-Pacific · PNG

Papua New Guinea

Baseline index 3.80Rank 151 of 197NascentIndo-PacificAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fuel-dependent. Budgets built on oil, gas and commodities: two of the upside scenarios are their downside. One of 15 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
32.7
rank 62 of 197 · 3 years: 32.4
Worst case
−19.2%
Trade bloc rupture · tail −18.4%
Opportunity · 10 years
−27.3
rank 188 of 197 · 3 years: −27.2
Best case
+2
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
16%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.26
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
4of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Trade bloc rupture, AI labour shock, Breadbasket failure. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; industry as a share of gdp; share of population aged under 15; low real gdp per head; low life expectancy at birth.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Papua New Guinea’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.65−0.73−0.87−0.40▼ 415Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.63−0.72−0.88−0.38▼ 416Energy Infrastructure 2.5 · Inception
AI labour shock S08Medium 0.54−0.65−0.75−0.34▲ 515Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09Medium 0.59−0.62−0.68−0.31011Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.45−0.57−0.67−0.30▲ 713Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.44−0.56−0.68−0.30▲ 514Energy Infrastructure 2.9 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.52−0.48−0.56−0.25▼ 412Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.3 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03Medium 0.42−0.47−0.59−0.26▲ 118Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.46−0.46−0.58−0.25▲ 1210Information Environment & Strategic Communication 1.9 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.46−0.45−0.56−0.25▲ 810Labour & Employment 2.9 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Trade bloc rupture−0.45−0.40−0.36−0.40−0.94−0.90−0.94−0.92−1.26
Core disaster−0.04−1.08−0.35−0.86−0.39−0.96−1.03−0.88−0.88
AI labour shock−0.39−0.35·−0.93−0.82−0.96−0.82−0.80−0.80
Cryptographic trust break−0.43−0.48−0.85·−1.06−1.00−0.93−0.40−0.46
Severe pandemic−0.41−0.32−0.26−0.77−0.67−0.72−0.67−0.66−0.66
Breadbasket failure−0.21−0.70−0.24−0.66−0.63−0.68−0.72−0.54−0.62
Hybrid coercion−0.26−0.80−0.80·−0.88−0.91·−0.33−0.33
Regional war spillover−0.20−0.64−0.56−0.25−0.25−0.62−0.58−0.50−0.64
Legitimacy rupture−0.19−0.30−0.54−0.27−0.63−0.88−0.72−0.27−0.31
Global funding seizure−0.19−0.31·−0.31−0.28−0.63−1.02−0.72−0.64
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Papua New Guinea is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+1.95.63.713134Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−0.57.07.523102Energy Infrastructure 4 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−7.310.818.114113Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−8.07.215.314135Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−13.28.021.214146Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−27.214.141.221180Digital & Services Trade 3.8 · Nascent
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−32.15.837.911189Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Loser−34.96.040.921184Intelligence & Assessment 3.3 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−39.12.741.85186Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−63.25.768.913187Energy Technologies 0.6 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Papua New Guinea, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability5.2 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 166Global funding seizure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.6Health System Capability 4.3
Breakdown of state function5.2 Nascent → Inception0.7% Unlikely · rank 186Hybrid coercion Extreme + Core disaster Severe×2.6Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 2
Food and water failure4.5 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 96Breadbasket failure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.6Health System Capability 4.3
Broad fall in financial strength5.1 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 178Global funding seizure Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.2
Rupture in trade and supply5.1 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 157Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.6Health System Capability 4.3
Health system failure4.2 Nascent → Inception0.2% Unlikely · rank 175Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2
Diplomatic isolation4.7 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 105Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in governance and integrity5.4 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 184Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×3.0Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in trade and investment4.6 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 157Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.4Advanced Manufacturing 3.6
Broad fall in information and influence3.9 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 143Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in production and innovation3.8 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 150Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×3.3Advanced Manufacturing 3.6
Rule of law failure5.9 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 181Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 0.3
Loss of industrial capacity4.2 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 157Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×3.1Advanced Manufacturing 3.6
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure4.9 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 156Hybrid coercion Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.8Health System Capability 4.3
Breakdown of information trust4.3 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 171Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in critical technology0.5 Inception— No route · rank 151Already at the foot of the scale×6.7—
Broad fall in national security2.1 Inception— No route · rank 152Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Broad fall in human capital3.9 Nascent → Inception— Remote · rank 184Core disaster Extreme + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.2Artificial Intelligence 0.7
Loss of advanced technology base0.2 Inception— No route · rank 151Already at the foot of the scale×15—
Collapse in energy security4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 154No route found · closest 2.7 of 3×3.3—
Failure of digital lifelines4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 155No route found · closest 2.6 of 3×3.4—
Defence readiness failure2.8 Inception— No route · rank 158Already at the foot of the scale×3.6—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.4 Inception— No route · rank 151Already at the foot of the scale×6.7—
Strategic awareness failure1.9 Inception— No route · rank 152Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Education pipeline failure4.6 Nascent → Inception— Remote · rank 189Core disaster Extreme + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.4Artificial Intelligence 0.7
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.5 Inception— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.4—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.9—
Broad rise in national security2.1 Inception— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Broad rise in human capital3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.4—
Broad rise in information and influence3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.3—
Broad rise in governance and integrity5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
Broad rise in financial strength5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.3—
Broad rise in production and innovation3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.1—
Broad rise in trade and investment4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.5—
Assured space services0.6 Inception— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Frontier AI and compute0.3 Inception— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.3—
Higher-value manufacturing2.0 Inception— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.5—
Reliable low-cost energy2.3 Inception— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.7—
Secure food and water supply4.5 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.9—
More deployable joint force2.9 Inception— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×17—
Adaptable skilled workforce3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.7—
Stronger health and biotechnology3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.5—
Stronger information environment3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.3—
Wider international influence4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.3—
Capable digital government4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Trusted public institutions5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.6—
Deeper long-term finance5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.4—
Research translated into value2.8 Inception— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.1—
Higher-value international business3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.3—
Sophisticated export strength4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 151No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.3—