Latin America and Caribbean · LCA

Saint Lucia

Baseline index 3.85Rank 149 of 197NascentLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile and exposed. Highly vulnerable importers of fuel, finance and food. One of 35 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
36.6
rank 45 of 197 · 3 years: 36.3
Worst case
−22.9%
Regional war spillover · tail −20.9%
Opportunity · 10 years
−15.1
rank 166 of 197 · 3 years: −15.0
Best case
+2
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
18%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.30
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
8of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; youth unemployment rate; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; services as a share of gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Saint Lucia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.82−0.88−1.02−0.47▼ 123Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.71−0.78−0.94−0.42▼ 321Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.80−0.75−0.95−0.42▼ 417Economic Output & Productivity 1.1 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.66−0.75−0.91−0.41021Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.57−0.68−0.84−0.37▲ 120Energy Infrastructure 1.8 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.69−0.63−0.71−0.33016Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.71−0.62−0.82−0.37▲ 317Force Generation & Mobilisation 0.1 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.56−0.58−0.77−0.34▲ 315Energy Infrastructure 1.9 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.47−0.52−0.61−0.27▲ 218Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Low 0.31−0.28−0.32−0.14▲ 47Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.2 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.17−1.21−0.61−0.52−0.52−1.31−1.22−1.05−1.35
AI labour shock−0.17−0.43·−1.17−1.02−1.20−1.02−1.00−1.00
Global funding seizure−0.16−0.51·−0.53−0.47−1.07−1.74−1.22−1.08
Severe pandemic−0.17−0.44−0.27−1.09−0.95−1.02−0.95−0.93−0.93
Breadbasket failure−0.14−0.86−0.23−0.84−0.80−0.86−0.92−0.69−0.79
Cryptographic trust break−0.17−0.54−0.57·−1.22−1.14−1.07−0.46−0.52
Legitimacy rupture−0.15−0.43−0.54−0.39−0.92−1.28−1.05−0.39−0.45
Core disaster−0.03−0.86−0.22−0.70−0.32−0.79−0.84−0.72−0.72
Trade bloc rupture−0.17−0.30−0.21−0.30−0.71−0.68−0.71−0.69−0.95
Hybrid coercion−0.10−0.49−0.40·−0.55−0.57·−0.21−0.21
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Saint Lucia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+1.58.36.814138Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−1.26.37.525119Energy Infrastructure 3.1 · Nascent
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−4.412.116.52085Energy Infrastructure 3.1 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−10.68.318.916135Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−11.37.719.011154Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Loser−13.24.517.816169Intelligence & Assessment 1.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−16.14.220.39137Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−16.76.523.213177Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−19.82.121.9494Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−30.310.140.415193Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Saint Lucia, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability5.9 Nascent → Inception4.6% Possible · rank 12Global funding seizure Extreme×1.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Breakdown of state function7.9 Foundational → Nascent3.0% Possible · rank 80Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Major×1.9Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Broad fall in financial strength5.5 Nascent → Inception2.1% Possible · rank 24Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Majorplans fail×1.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Broad fall in governance and integrity7.3 Foundational → Nascent1.5% Possible · rank 81Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2.3
Rupture in trade and supply4.1 Nascent → Inception1.4% Possible · rank 44Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×1.6Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Health system failure7.5 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 48Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4
Broad fall in trade and investment4.2 Nascent → Inception0.7% Unlikely · rank 56Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Extreme×2.2Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Rule of law failure7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 116Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2.3
Broad fall in production and innovation3.8 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 43Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.5Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Loss of industrial capacity3.5 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 71Trade bloc rupture Severe + Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×2.3Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Food and water failure4.9 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 94Regional war spillover Severe + Breadbasket failure Extreme×2.2Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Broad fall in human capital6.3 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 56Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4
Education pipeline failure7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 41Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4
Breakdown of information trust4.2 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 162Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2.3
Broad fall in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 149Already at the foot of the scale×17—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 174No route found · closest 3.0 of 3×2.5—
Broad fall in national security0.7 Inception— No route · rank 150Already at the foot of the scale×5.0—
Broad fall in information and influence2.9 Inception— No route · rank 165Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 149Already at the foot of the scale——
Collapse in energy security1.6 Inception— No route · rank 152Already at the foot of the scale×2.4—
Failure of digital lifelines3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 2.6 of 3×3.4—
Defence readiness failure0.9 Inception— No route · rank 156Already at the foot of the scale×4.3—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 149Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Strategic awareness failure0.8 Inception— No route · rank 150Already at the foot of the scale×3.6—
Diplomatic isolation3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 172No route found · closest 2.7 of 3×2.5—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.0—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.9—
Broad rise in national security0.7 Inception— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×20—
Broad rise in human capital6.3 Foundational— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.4—
Broad rise in information and influence2.9 Inception— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Broad rise in governance and integrity7.3 Foundational— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.6—
Broad rise in financial strength5.5 Nascent— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.5—
Broad rise in production and innovation3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.3—
Broad rise in trade and investment4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.3—
Assured space services0.3 Inception— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.9—
Higher-value manufacturing1.4 Inception— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Reliable low-cost energy1.8 Inception— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.5—
Secure food and water supply4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.7—
More deployable joint force0.9 Inception— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×22—
Adaptable skilled workforce5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.6—
Stronger health and biotechnology5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.9—
Stronger information environment2.8 Inception— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.0—
Wider international influence3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Capable digital government6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.0—
Trusted public institutions6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.0—
Deeper long-term finance5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.6—
Research translated into value2.9 Inception— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.3—
Higher-value international business4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.0—
Sophisticated export strength3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 149No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.2—