Latin America and Caribbean · VCT

Saint Vincent & Grenadines

Baseline index 3.76Rank 153 of 197NascentLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile and exposed. Highly vulnerable importers of fuel, finance and food. One of 35 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
38.8
rank 40 of 197 · 3 years: 38.6
Worst case
−22.5%
Regional war spillover · tail −22.2%
Opportunity · 10 years
−12.5
rank 147 of 197 · 3 years: −12.4
Best case
+5
Clean power threshold · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
17%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.31
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
8of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Breadbasket failure, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; youth unemployment rate; staple foods among the top five imports; public debt relative to gdp; little renewable water per head; remittances relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Saint Vincent & Grenadines’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.78−0.85−0.98−0.45▼ 119Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06High 0.71−0.85−1.04−0.46▼ 219Energy Infrastructure 1.7 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.72−0.82−0.98−0.44▼ 317Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.67−0.75−0.90−0.40▼ 317Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.81−0.72−0.93−0.43014Force Generation & Mobilisation 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.74−0.70−0.88−0.39▼ 313Investment Attraction & Projection 0.9 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.63−0.65−0.86−0.38▲ 114Energy Infrastructure 1.9 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.67−0.62−0.69−0.33▼ 112Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.43−0.48−0.56−0.25▲ 510Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.37−0.33−0.37−0.17▲ 15Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.1 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.16−1.16−0.59−0.50−0.50−1.25−1.17−1.00−1.29
Breadbasket failure−0.16−1.06−0.28−1.05−1.00−1.07−1.14−0.86−0.98
Severe pandemic−0.17−0.48−0.29−1.18−1.04−1.11−1.04−1.02−1.02
AI labour shock−0.17−0.41·−1.12−0.98−1.15−0.98−0.96−0.96
Legitimacy rupture−0.16−0.49−0.58−0.46−1.07−1.49−1.23−0.46−0.53
Global funding seizure−0.16−0.47·−0.49−0.44−0.99−1.61−1.13−1.00
Core disaster−0.04−0.96−0.24−0.80−0.36−0.89−0.95−0.82−0.82
Cryptographic trust break−0.17−0.52−0.57·−1.19−1.12−1.04−0.45−0.51
Trade bloc rupture−0.17−0.28−0.19−0.28−0.65−0.62−0.65−0.63−0.87
Hybrid coercion−0.12−0.57−0.46·−0.65−0.67·−0.24−0.24
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Saint Vincent & Grenadines is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+5.47.82.411105Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+2.18.96.814132Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−0.76.87.525106Energy Infrastructure 3.4 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−3.14.97.916141Intelligence & Assessment 1.2 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−10.110.320.418118Investment Attraction & Projection 2.7 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−10.48.819.116133Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−15.28.223.412171Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−16.53.520.09139Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−23.02.025.04119Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−26.611.237.815190Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Saint Vincent & Grenadines, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function7.8 Foundational → Nascent4.2% Possible · rank 30Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severe×1.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Loss of financial stability5.8 Nascent → Inception3.3% Possible · rank 29Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severe×1.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Broad fall in financial strength5.4 Nascent → Inception2.7% Possible · rank 11Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Majorplans fail×1.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Health system failure7.3 Foundational → Nascent2.1% Possible · rank 5Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Severe×1.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4
Broad fall in governance and integrity7.2 Foundational → Nascent1.8% Possible · rank 63Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Rupture in trade and supply4.1 Nascent → Inception1.7% Possible · rank 28Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×1.7Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Food and water failure4.6 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 32Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×1.8Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Rule of law failure7.1 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Possible · rank 43Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Broad fall in human capital6.1 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 9Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4
Broad fall in trade and investment3.8 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 89Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.3Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Loss of industrial capacity3.4 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 74Global funding seizure Extreme + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.5Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Education pipeline failure7.2 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 17Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4
Breakdown of information trust4.0 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 145Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Broad fall in production and innovation3.7 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 84Global funding seizure Extreme + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure3.7 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 144Regional war spillover Extreme + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×2.6Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Broad fall in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 153Already at the foot of the scale×17—
Broad fall in national security0.7 Inception— No route · rank 154Already at the foot of the scale×5.1—
Broad fall in information and influence3.0 Inception— No route · rank 167Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 153Already at the foot of the scale——
Collapse in energy security1.7 Inception— No route · rank 156Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Failure of digital lifelines3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 157No route found · closest 2.6 of 3×3.6—
Defence readiness failure0.9 Inception— No route · rank 160Already at the foot of the scale×4.2—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 153Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Strategic awareness failure0.8 Inception— No route · rank 154Already at the foot of the scale×3.6—
Diplomatic isolation3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 174No route found · closest 3.0 of 3×2.5—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.1—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×8.1—
Broad rise in national security0.7 Inception— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×19—
Broad rise in human capital6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×8.0—
Broad rise in information and influence3.0 Inception— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.6—
Broad rise in governance and integrity7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.0—
Broad rise in financial strength5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.7—
Broad rise in production and innovation3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.7—
Broad rise in trade and investment3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.2—
Assured space services0.3 Inception— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.9—
Higher-value manufacturing1.4 Inception— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Reliable low-cost energy1.9 Inception— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.4—
Secure food and water supply4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.1—
More deployable joint force0.9 Inception— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×20—
Adaptable skilled workforce5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.8—
Stronger health and biotechnology5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Stronger information environment2.7 Inception— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.4—
Wider international influence3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Capable digital government6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
Trusted public institutions6.5 Foundational— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
Deeper long-term finance5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.1—
Research translated into value2.7 Inception— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.2—
Higher-value international business3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×5.8—
Sophisticated export strength3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 153No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.3—