Slovakia
Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.
Vulnerability and opportunity
Archetype: Climbers. Low vulnerability, and gains from open markets and digital public services. One of 39 nations with a similar pattern of results.
Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.
- Vulnerability · 10 years
- 13.6
- rank 143 of 197 · 3 years: 13.4
- Opportunity · 10 years
- +9.8
- rank 42 of 197 · 3 years: +10.0
- Shock absorbed
- 40%
- by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
- Policy dividend
- +0.16
- expected index points from best practice
- Breadth
- 10of 10
- scenarios in which a domain falls a band
- Weakest link
- Maritime Power
- weakest point in 2 scenarios
Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Hybrid coercion. Highest exposure indicators: no coastline; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; few months of imports covered by reserves; internet users as a share of population; refugees hosted per head of population; share of population aged 65 and over.
Downside scenarios: load test
Change in Slovakia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.
ScenarioChange in index, points
| Scenario | Exposure | Change | No response | Best practice | Rank shift | Bands lost | Weakest point |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regional war spillover S03 | High 0.96 | −0.87 | −1.38 | −0.61 | ▼ 1 | 30 | Maritime Power 0 · Inception |
| Severe pandemic S10 | High 0.81 | −0.74 | −1.25 | −0.55 | ▼ 1 | 27 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.2 · Nascent |
| Cryptographic trust break S09 | High 0.87 | −0.73 | −1.09 | −0.48 | 0 | 26 | Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.5 · Nascent |
| AI labour shock S08 | High 0.81 | −0.70 | −1.21 | −0.53 | 0 | 25 | Artificial Intelligence 5.3 · Nascent |
| Trade bloc rupture S01 | High 0.70 | −0.62 | −1.04 | −0.46 | 0 | 19 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.7 · Inception |
| Global funding seizure S02 | High 0.87 | −0.59 | −1.08 | −0.47 | ▼ 1 | 24 | Investment Attraction & Projection 8.9 · Foundational |
| Hybrid coercion S04 | High 0.71 | −0.47 | −0.77 | −0.34 | 0 | 19 | Maritime Power 0 · Inception |
| Legitimacy rupture S05 | Medium 0.51 | −0.37 | −0.66 | −0.29 | 0 | 15 | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7.5 · Foundational |
| Breadbasket failure S06 | Medium 0.38 | −0.35 | −0.60 | −0.26 | 0 | 16 | Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.1 · Foundational |
| Core disaster S07 | Medium 0.39 | −0.29 | −0.54 | −0.24 | ▲ 1 | 14 | Trade Facilitation & Logistics 8.9 · Foundational |
Where each scenario lands
Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.
| Scenario | CT Critical Technology | SI Strategic Infrastructure | NS National Security | HC Human Capital | II Information & Influence | GI Governance & Integrity | FS Financial Strength | PI Production & Innovation | TI Trade & Investment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regional war spillover | −0.50 | −1.19 | −0.96 | −0.46 | −0.46 | −1.14 | −1.06 | −0.91 | −1.17 |
| Severe pandemic | −0.79 | −0.40 | −0.32 | −0.96 | −0.84 | −0.90 | −0.84 | −0.82 | −0.82 |
| Cryptographic trust break | −0.95 | −0.52 | −0.92 | · | −1.15 | −1.08 | −1.01 | −0.43 | −0.49 |
| AI labour shock | −0.78 | −0.35 | · | −0.94 | −0.83 | −0.97 | −0.83 | −0.81 | −0.81 |
| Trade bloc rupture | −0.81 | −0.31 | −0.28 | −0.31 | −0.73 | −0.70 | −0.73 | −0.72 | −0.98 |
| Global funding seizure | −0.35 | −0.39 | · | −0.39 | −0.35 | −0.79 | −1.29 | −0.91 | −0.81 |
| Hybrid coercion | −0.36 | −0.78 | −0.70 | · | −0.87 | −0.90 | · | −0.33 | −0.33 |
| Legitimacy rupture | −0.21 | −0.24 | −0.43 | −0.21 | −0.50 | −0.70 | −0.57 | −0.21 | −0.25 |
| Breadbasket failure | −0.19 | −0.44 | −0.15 | −0.41 | −0.39 | −0.42 | −0.45 | −0.34 | −0.39 |
| Core disaster | −0.02 | −0.43 | −0.14 | −0.34 | −0.15 | −0.39 | −0.41 | −0.35 | −0.35 |
Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.
Upside scenarios: capture test
Net position in each upside scenario: what Slovakia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.
| Scenario | Position | Net | Capture | Loss | Readiness | Rank | Binding capability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clean power threshold S15 ↗ | Gainer | +34.4 | 37.6 | 3.2 | 42 | 22 | Energy Technologies 5.6 · Nascent |
| Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗ | Gainer | +32.0 | 34.1 | 2.0 | 44 | 40 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 · Foundational |
| Middle East settlement S14 ↗ | Gainer | +28.8 | 31.6 | 2.8 | 51 | 21 | Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.8 · Foundational |
| Public service leap S18 ↗ | Mixed | +7.1 | 12.8 | 5.7 | 44 | 45 | Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 6.2 · Foundational |
| Market access opening S12 ↗ | Mixed | +4.7 | 28.0 | 23.3 | 53 | 54 | Trade Facilitation & Logistics 9.5 · Transitional |
| Great-power détente S13 ↗ | Mixed | +4.0 | 18.4 | 14.4 | 34 | 39 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3 · Nascent |
| Chronic disease advance S19 ↗ | Mixed | +3.7 | 31.0 | 27.3 | 46 | 57 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 · Foundational |
| Automated discovery step S17 ↗ | Mixed | +2.7 | 24.0 | 21.4 | 28 | 45 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3 · Nascent |
| Debt service reset S11 ↗ | Mixed | −0.6 | 8.4 | 9.0 | 59 | 104 | Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 11 · Transitional |
| Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗ | Mixed | −1.3 | 8.3 | 9.7 | 44 | 112 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 · Foundational |
Reverse stress test
Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Slovakia, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.
| Routes to failure | Basket | Likelihood | Most likely route | Headroom | Lever |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breakdown of state function | 13.0 Established → Transitional | 4.2% Possible · rank 31 | Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail | ×2.2 | Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 8 |
| Loss of financial stability | 12.5 Established → Transitional | 2.9% Possible · rank 42 | Global funding seizure Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail | ×2.1 | Quantum Technologies 3.3 |
| Broad fall in financial strength | 11.9 Transitional → Foundational | 2.2% Possible · rank 21 | Global funding seizure Severe + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail | ×2.3 | Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 8.8 |
| Broad fall in governance and integrity | 12.5 Established → Transitional | 1.9% Possible · rank 50 | Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail | ×2.6 | Quantum Technologies 3.3 |
| Strategic awareness failure | 6.9 Foundational → Nascent | 1.6% Possible · rank 22 | Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail | ×2.1 | Quantum Technologies 3.3 |
| Collapse in energy security | 8.9 Foundational → Nascent | 1.3% Possible · rank 19 | Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail | ×2.0 | Maritime Power 0.5 |
| Breakdown of information trust | 9.9 Transitional → Foundational | 1.2% Possible · rank 26 | Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail | ×2.6 | Quantum Technologies 3.3 |
| Rupture in trade and supply | 11.1 Transitional → Foundational | 1.2% Possible · rank 58 | Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail | ×1.9 | Maritime Power 0.5 |
| Broad fall in trade and investment | 11.4 Transitional → Foundational | 1.1% Possible · rank 25 | Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail | ×2.6 | Maritime Power 0.5 |
| Broad fall in information and influence | 9.1 Transitional → Nascent | 1.0% Possible · rank 20 | Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail | ×2.6 | Quantum Technologies 3.3 |
| Rule of law failure | 12.1 Established → Foundational | 1.0% Unlikely · rank 45 | Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail | ×2.6 | Quantum Technologies 3.3 |
| Diplomatic isolation | 9.6 Transitional → Foundational | 0.9% Unlikely · rank 28 | Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail | ×2.6 | Quantum Technologies 3.3 |
| Health system failure | 12.3 Established → Transitional | 0.8% Unlikely · rank 63 | Global funding seizure Major + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail | ×2.1 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 |
| Broad fall in strategic infrastructure | 11.0 Transitional → Foundational | 0.8% Unlikely · rank 18 | Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail | ×2.5 | Maritime Power 0.5 |
| Broad fall in production and innovation | 11.5 Transitional → Foundational | 0.8% Unlikely · rank 9 | Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail | ×3.3 | Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 8.8 |
| Loss of industrial capacity | 12.0 Established → Foundational | 0.8% Unlikely · rank 14 | Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail | ×3.1 | Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 8.8 |
| Failure of digital lifelines | 10.2 Transitional → Foundational | 0.7% Unlikely · rank 27 | Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail | ×2.6 | Quantum Technologies 3.3 |
| Broad fall in human capital | 12.2 Established → Transitional | 0.3% Unlikely · rank 17 | Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail | ×3.1 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 |
| Broad fall in critical technology | 5.1 Nascent → Inception | 0.3% Unlikely · rank 12 | Trade bloc rupture Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail | ×3.1 | Quantum Technologies 3.3 |
| Broad fall in national security | 6.2 Foundational → Nascent | 0.3% Unlikely · rank 47 | Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail | ×3.1 | Maritime Power 0.5 |
| Loss of advanced technology base | 4.1 Nascent → Inception | 0.3% Unlikely · rank 6 | Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail | ×3.2 | Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.8 |
| Food and water failure | 11.3 Transitional → Foundational | 0.2% Remote · rank 134 | Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail | ×3.3 | Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 8 |
| Education pipeline failure | 13.0 Established → Transitional | 0.1% Remote · rank 53 | Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail | ×3.3 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 |
| Defence readiness failure | 6.9 Foundational → Nascent | under 0.1% Remote · rank 101 | Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail | ×3.7 | Maritime Power 0.5 |
| Loss of strategic deterrence | 3.0 Nascent → Inception | under 0.1% Remote · rank 31 | Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail | ×3.3 | Maritime Power 0.5 |
| Routes to prosperity | Basket | Likelihood | Most likely route | Headroom | Lever |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliable low-cost energy | 8.9 Foundational → Transitional | 3.3% Possible · rank 31 | Clean power threshold Extreme | ×1.3 | Energy Technologies 5.6 |
| Stronger health and biotechnology | 10.4 Transitional → Established | 2.2% Possible · rank 46 | Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe | ×1.8 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 |
| Broad rise in governance and integrity | 12.5 Established → Established | 1.0% Possible · rank 45 | Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme | ×2.1 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 |
| Trusted public institutions | 12.0 Transitional → Established | 0.8% Unlikely · rank 48 | Market access opening Severe + Clean power threshold Extreme | ×2.1 | Energy Technologies 5.6 |
| Capable digital government | 12.3 Established → Established | 0.8% Unlikely · rank 55 | Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme | ×2.2 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 |
| Broad rise in trade and investment | 11.4 Transitional → Established | 0.7% Unlikely · rank 38 | Market access opening Severe + Clean power threshold Extreme | ×2.3 | Energy Technologies 5.6 |
| Frontier AI and compute | 4.8 Nascent → Foundational | 0.7% Unlikely · rank 41 | Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Extreme | ×2.1 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3 |
| Broad rise in critical technology | 5.1 Nascent → Foundational | 0.4% Unlikely · rank 44 | Clean power threshold Extreme + Automated discovery step Severe | ×2.4 | Energy Technologies 5.6 |
| Broad rise in strategic infrastructure | 11.0 Transitional → Established | 0.4% Unlikely · rank 38 | Market access opening Severe + Clean power threshold Extreme | ×2.2 | Energy Technologies 5.6 |
| Higher-value international business | 10.9 Transitional → Established | 0.4% Unlikely · rank 37 | Market access opening Severe + Clean power threshold Extreme | ×2.1 | Energy Technologies 5.6 |
| Research translated into value | 10.8 Transitional → Established | 0.4% Unlikely · rank 39 | Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Extreme | ×2.3 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3 |
| Broad rise in production and innovation | 11.5 Transitional → Established | 0.3% Unlikely · rank 35 | Market access opening Severe + Clean power threshold Extreme | ×2.1 | Energy Technologies 5.6 |
| Wider international influence | 9.6 Transitional → Transitional | 0.2% Remote · rank 32 | Great-power détente Major + Middle East settlement Extreme | ×1.9 | Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.8 |
| Broad rise in financial strength | 11.9 Transitional → Established | 0.1% Remote · rank 40 | Clean power threshold Severe + Chronic disease advance Extreme | ×2.3 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 |
| Deeper long-term finance | 11.3 Transitional → Established | 0.1% Remote · rank 35 | Clean power threshold Extreme + Chronic disease advance Severe | ×2.1 | Energy Technologies 5.6 |
| Sophisticated export strength | 12.8 Established → Established | 0.1% Remote · rank 42 | Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme | ×2.7 | Energy Technologies 5.6 |
| Higher-value manufacturing | 9.3 Transitional → Transitional | 0.1% Remote · rank 38 | Clean power threshold Extreme + Automated discovery step Extreme | ×2.7 | Energy Technologies 5.6 |
| Broad rise in human capital | 12.2 Established → Established | under 0.1% Remote · rank 50 | Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme | ×2.6 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 |
| Secure food and water supply | 11.3 Transitional → Established | under 0.1% Remote · rank 54 | Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme | ×2.7 | Energy Technologies 5.6 |
| Adaptable skilled workforce | 11.8 Transitional → Established | under 0.1% Remote · rank 48 | Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme | ×2.9 | Trade Facilitation & Logistics 9.5 |
| Broad rise in information and influence | 9.1 Transitional → Transitional | under 0.1% Remote · rank 43 | Great-power détente Extreme + Middle East settlement Extreme | ×2.4 | Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.8 |
| Stronger information environment | 8.6 Foundational → Transitional | under 0.1% Remote · rank 49 | Great-power détente Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme | ×2.2 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.6 |
| Broad rise in national security | 6.2 Foundational | — No route · rank 46 | No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5 | ×2.9 | — |
| Assured space services | 4.1 Nascent | — No route · rank 46 | No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5 | ×3.4 | — |
| More deployable joint force | 6.6 Foundational | — No route · rank 46 | No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5 | ×3.2 | — |