Africa · TUN

Tunisia

Baseline index 7.71Rank 71 of 197FoundationalAfricaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Stretched developers. Exposed to food and funding shocks; debt relief and better yields are their upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
16.0
rank 127 of 197 · 3 years: 15.8
Worst case
−10.1%
Legitimacy rupture · tail −9.7%
Opportunity · 10 years
+4.4
rank 58 of 197 · 3 years: +4.6
Best case
+21
Water-efficient food leap · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed
31%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.21
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI labour shock, Regional war spillover, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: youth unemployment rate; little renewable water per head; adult obesity rate; consumer price inflation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Tunisia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.87−0.78−1.13−0.49▼ 118Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.9 · Nascent
Severe pandemic S10High 0.72−0.76−1.12−0.49018Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.5 · Nascent
Core disaster S07High 0.79−0.71−1.10−0.48▼ 222Energy Infrastructure 5.6 · Nascent
AI labour shock S08High 0.64−0.66−0.96−0.42015Artificial Intelligence 3.7 · Nascent
Regional war spillover S03High 0.61−0.63−0.89−0.39021Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 2.7 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.65−0.62−0.82−0.36016Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.7 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.68−0.60−0.85−0.37▼ 117Financial Stability & Crisis Management 5.9 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.55−0.57−0.87−0.38▼ 117Energy Infrastructure 6 · Foundational
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.40−0.42−0.60−0.26▲ 114Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.3 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.38−0.31−0.43−0.19012Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.8 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Legitimacy rupture−0.45−0.50−0.90−0.45−1.05−1.47−1.20−0.45−0.52
Severe pandemic−0.81−0.40−0.33−0.98−0.86−0.92−0.86−0.84−0.84
Core disaster−0.04−1.06−0.34−0.84−0.38−0.95−1.01−0.87−0.87
AI labour shock−0.73−0.33·−0.88−0.77−0.91−0.77−0.76−0.76
Regional war spillover−0.36−0.84−0.77−0.32−0.32−0.81−0.75−0.65−0.83
Cryptographic trust break−0.81−0.44−0.81·−0.98−0.92−0.86−0.37−0.42
Global funding seizure−0.36−0.39·−0.40−0.36−0.81−1.32−0.92−0.82
Breadbasket failure−0.30−0.71−0.25−0.67−0.64−0.68−0.73−0.55−0.63
Trade bloc rupture−0.54−0.21−0.19−0.21−0.49−0.47−0.49−0.48−0.66
Hybrid coercion−0.23−0.50−0.50·−0.56−0.58·−0.21−0.21
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Tunisia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Gainer+21.223.92.73817Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Foundational
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+15.425.810.43771Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Foundational
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+9.215.56.24117Energy Infrastructure 7.1 · Foundational
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+8.919.710.92991Energy Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+8.418.610.13972Intelligence & Assessment 6.8 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+3.923.519.63261Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.2 · Nascent
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+1.824.522.74163Energy Infrastructure 7.1 · Foundational
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed0.024.524.53879Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Foundational
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−1.58.09.42654Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.2 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−12.39.722.02170Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.2 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Tunisia, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability8.0 Foundational → Nascent2.9% Possible · rank 40Global funding seizure Major + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Breakdown of state function9.3 Transitional → Foundational2.3% Possible · rank 111Global funding seizure Major + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×1.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Broad fall in financial strength7.6 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Possible · rank 115Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.3Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.4
Broad fall in governance and integrity9.0 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Unlikely · rank 131Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Health system failure10.7 Transitional → Foundational0.8% Unlikely · rank 62Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6
Food and water failure10.8 Transitional → Foundational0.6% Unlikely · rank 57Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.6Financial System Depth & Access 8.2
Rule of law failure8.6 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 107Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Breakdown of information trust7.9 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 91Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Loss of industrial capacity9.0 Transitional → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 45Global funding seizure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.0Financial System Depth & Access 8.2
Rupture in trade and supply9.0 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 130Global funding seizure Major + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 5.3
Broad fall in production and innovation8.8 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 61Global funding seizure Extreme + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.3Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.4
Broad fall in trade and investment8.7 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 112Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×3.5Maritime Power 5.3
Collapse in energy security6.4 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 78Regional war spillover Extreme + Breadbasket failure Majorplans fail×2.8Maritime Power 5.3
Broad fall in information and influence7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 96Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Strategic awareness failure5.1 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 74Regional war spillover Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 1.8
Defence readiness failure7.2 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 54Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure9.0 Transitional → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 95Breadbasket failure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.8Financial System Depth & Access 8.2
Diplomatic isolation7.0 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 100Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×3.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Broad fall in human capital10.1 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Unlikely · rank 48Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6
Broad fall in national security5.4 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 64Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×3.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7
Education pipeline failure10.8 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 77Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6
Failure of digital lifelines7.9 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 99Global funding seizure Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.1Quantum Technologies 1.8
Broad fall in critical technology3.5 Nascent → Inception— Remote · rank 73AI labour shock Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6
Loss of advanced technology base2.4 Inception— No route · rank 73Already at the foot of the scale×4.1—
Loss of strategic deterrence2.0 Inception— No route · rank 74Already at the foot of the scale×4.7—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Capable digital government9.9 Transitional → Transitional0.5% Unlikely · rank 60Market access opening Severe + Public service leap Extreme×2.1Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.2
Stronger health and biotechnology9.1 Transitional → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 66Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6
Trusted public institutions8.6 Foundational → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 65Market access opening Severe + Public service leap Extreme×2.1Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.2
Secure food and water supply10.8 Transitional → Established0.3% Unlikely · rank 39Market access opening Severe + Water-efficient food leap Extreme×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6
Broad rise in governance and integrity9.0 Foundational → Transitional0.1% Remote · rank 65Market access opening Extreme + Public service leap Extreme×2.6Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.2
Reliable low-cost energy5.2 Nascent → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 65Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.5Energy Technologies 3.2
Higher-value international business8.4 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 54Market access opening Extreme + Water-efficient food leap Extreme×2.5Energy Infrastructure 7.1
Broad rise in trade and investment8.7 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 68Market access opening Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.6Energy Infrastructure 7.1
Broad rise in critical technology3.5 Nascent— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure9.0 Transitional— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.2—
Broad rise in national security5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.9—
Broad rise in human capital10.1 Transitional— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Broad rise in information and influence7.3 Foundational— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.3—
Broad rise in financial strength7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Broad rise in production and innovation8.8 Foundational— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.7—
Assured space services2.6 Inception— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.4—
Frontier AI and compute3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.9—
Higher-value manufacturing6.8 Foundational— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.9—
More deployable joint force6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Adaptable skilled workforce9.0 Foundational— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.3—
Stronger information environment7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.9—
Wider international influence7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.2—
Deeper long-term finance7.9 Foundational— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.4—
Research translated into value8.7 Foundational— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.1—
Sophisticated export strength9.3 Transitional— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.1—