Indo-Pacific · VUT

Vanuatu

Baseline index 2.93Rank 173 of 197InceptionIndo-PacificAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile and exposed. Highly vulnerable importers of fuel, finance and food. One of 35 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
49.4
rank 21 of 197 · 3 years: 48.9
Worst case
−32.8%
Regional war spillover · tail −30.1%
Opportunity · 10 years
−10.3
rank 128 of 197 · 3 years: −9.7
Best case
+5
Middle East settlement · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
14%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.32
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
6of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Hybrid coercion. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; remittances relative to gdp; low real gdp per head; consumer price inflation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Vanuatu’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.87−0.96−1.08−0.50▼ 524Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.80−0.89−1.09−0.48▼ 423Industrial & Sectoral Base 0.5 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.68−0.79−0.90−0.40▼ 219Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.71−0.67−0.73−0.34▼ 213Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.66−0.62−0.77−0.34▲ 214Force Generation & Mobilisation 0.4 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.51−0.61−0.71−0.32▲ 315Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.45−0.51−0.58−0.26▲ 112Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.58−0.51−0.56−0.26▼ 312Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.48−0.49−0.58−0.25▲ 113Investment Attraction & Projection 1.1 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.38−0.47−0.56−0.25▲ 513Energy Infrastructure 1.7 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.15−1.30−0.67−0.57−0.57−1.43−1.33−1.14−1.47
Core disaster−0.04−1.31−0.32−1.09−0.49−1.22−1.31−1.12−1.12
AI labour shock−0.15−0.44·−1.19−1.04−1.23−1.04−1.02−1.02
Cryptographic trust break−0.15−0.57−0.62·−1.30−1.22−1.14−0.49−0.56
Legitimacy rupture−0.13−0.42−0.56−0.39−0.91−1.27−1.04−0.39−0.45
Severe pandemic−0.15−0.36−0.22−0.88−0.77−0.82−0.77−0.75−0.75
Trade bloc rupture−0.15−0.29−0.20−0.29−0.68−0.66−0.68−0.67−0.92
Hybrid coercion−0.15−0.89−0.65·−1.04−1.07·−0.39−0.39
Global funding seizure−0.11−0.33·−0.34−0.30−0.68−1.12−0.78−0.70
Breadbasket failure−0.11−0.60−0.17−0.58−0.55−0.59−0.63−0.47−0.54
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Vanuatu is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+4.76.82.11497Intelligence & Assessment 1.2 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+4.56.41.98109Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+1.35.03.711142Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−2.16.08.019125Energy Infrastructure 2.6 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−6.39.615.91593Investment Attraction & Projection 2.3 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−8.39.117.512119Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−11.94.816.79155Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−19.67.326.911172Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−21.42.023.43109Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−30.73.334.18185Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Vanuatu, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function6.3 Foundational → Nascent3.8% Possible · rank 48Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severe×1.8Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Broad fall in governance and integrity5.7 Nascent → Inception2.2% Possible · rank 34Regional war spillover Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Major×2.1Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Loss of financial stability4.1 Nascent → Inception2.0% Possible · rank 83Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Major×2.0Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Rupture in trade and supply3.4 Nascent → Inception1.6% Possible · rank 31Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×1.5Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Broad fall in financial strength3.9 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 100Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.3Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Rule of law failure5.7 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 87Hybrid coercion Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Food and water failure3.7 Nascent → Inception0.5% Unlikely · rank 64Hybrid coercion Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.0Financial System Depth & Access 3.4
Health system failure5.5 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 128Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Extreme×2.0Financial System Depth & Access 3.4
Diplomatic isolation3.3 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 140Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.3Quantum Technologies 0
Broad fall in human capital4.2 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 163Breadbasket failure Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.5Financial System Depth & Access 3.4
Education pipeline failure4.8 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 149Breadbasket failure Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.7Financial System Depth & Access 3.4
Breakdown of information trust3.6 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 168Hybrid coercion Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Broad fall in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 173Already at the foot of the scale×20—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure3.0 Inception— No route · rank 177Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Broad fall in national security0.8 Inception— No route · rank 174Already at the foot of the scale×4.5—
Broad fall in information and influence3.0 Inception— No route · rank 175Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Broad fall in production and innovation2.7 Inception— No route · rank 173Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Broad fall in trade and investment2.9 Inception— No route · rank 177Already at the foot of the scale×2.0—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 173Already at the foot of the scale——
Collapse in energy security1.4 Inception— No route · rank 173Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Failure of digital lifelines2.9 Inception— No route · rank 173Already at the foot of the scale×3.1—
Defence readiness failure0.9 Inception— No route · rank 177Already at the foot of the scale×4.2—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 173Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Strategic awareness failure0.8 Inception— No route · rank 174Already at the foot of the scale×3.6—
Loss of industrial capacity2.6 Inception— No route · rank 175Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10.0—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure3.0 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.7—
Broad rise in national security0.8 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Broad rise in human capital4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.4—
Broad rise in information and influence3.0 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Broad rise in governance and integrity5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.8—
Broad rise in financial strength3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Broad rise in production and innovation2.7 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Broad rise in trade and investment2.9 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×6.6—
Assured space services0.3 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Higher-value manufacturing1.1 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×13—
Reliable low-cost energy1.5 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.8—
Secure food and water supply3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×10—
More deployable joint force1.1 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×15—
Adaptable skilled workforce3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.3—
Stronger health and biotechnology3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.2—
Stronger information environment2.7 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Wider international influence3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.8—
Capable digital government4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.5—
Trusted public institutions5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.5—
Deeper long-term finance3.5 Nascent— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.8—
Research translated into value2.0 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Higher-value international business2.7 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×6.3—
Sophisticated export strength2.7 Inception— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.8—