Europe · FIN

Finland

Baseline index 14.52Rank 15 of 197EstablishedEuropeAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
7.4
rank 179 of 197 · 3 years: 7.4
Worst case
−4.2%
Regional war spillover · tail −3.8%
Opportunity · 10 years
+31.3
rank 13 of 197 · 3 years: +31.7
Best case
+58
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 8 of 10
Shock absorbed
58%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.04
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
6of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Information Environment & Strategic Communication
weakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Hybrid coercion, Regional war spillover, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: land border with russia or belarus; share of population aged 65 and over; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; internet users as a share of population; few months of imports covered by reserves; urban share of population; refugees hosted per head of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Finland’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.89−0.61−1.29−0.53018Resource Infrastructure 8.7 · Foundational
Severe pandemic S10High 0.85−0.55−1.32−0.52▼ 118Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.6 · Transitional
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.97−0.49−1.07−0.45▼ 118Maritime Power 9.2 · Transitional
AI labour shock S08High 0.83−0.49−1.24−0.47016Artificial Intelligence 11 · Transitional
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.89−0.47−1.13−0.44019Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.6 · Transitional
Global funding seizure S02High 0.76−0.39−0.95−0.38▼ 112Economic Output & Productivity 12.1 · Established
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.58−0.38−0.86−0.36014Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 7.7 · Foundational
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.35−0.24−0.55−0.22012Agriculture & Food Infrastructure 13 · Established
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.47−0.22−0.60−0.22011Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.1 · Established
Core disaster S07Medium 0.35−0.18−0.49−0.18010Trade Facilitation & Logistics 14.1 · Established

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.35−0.82−0.76−0.32−0.32−0.79−0.74−0.63−0.81
Severe pandemic−0.59−0.29−0.24−0.71−0.62−0.67−0.62−0.61−0.61
Hybrid coercion−0.36−0.79−0.79·−0.88−0.91·−0.33−0.33
AI labour shock−0.55−0.25·−0.66−0.58−0.68−0.58−0.57−0.57
Cryptographic trust break−0.61−0.33−0.61·−0.74−0.69−0.65−0.28−0.32
Global funding seizure−0.23−0.26·−0.26−0.23−0.53−0.86−0.60−0.54
Trade bloc rupture−0.49−0.19−0.17−0.19−0.44−0.43−0.44−0.44−0.60
Breadbasket failure−0.13−0.30−0.10−0.28−0.27−0.29−0.30−0.23−0.26
Legitimacy rupture−0.13−0.14−0.26−0.13−0.30−0.42−0.35−0.13−0.15
Core disaster−0.01−0.27−0.09−0.21−0.10−0.24−0.26−0.22−0.22
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Finland is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+57.658.50.97112Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7 · Established
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+49.753.94.2629Resource Infrastructure 10 · Transitional
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+42.955.112.17310Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13 · Established
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Gainer+41.449.17.75616Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8.5 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+35.839.03.27410Alliances & Security Cooperation 14 · Established
Market access opening S12 ↗Gainer+22.031.39.37613Trade Facilitation & Logistics 14.5 · Established
Great-power détente S13 ↗Gainer+19.826.97.15718Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8.5 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Gainer+18.920.81.9818Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 15.6 · Advanced
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+3.99.55.67282Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13 · Established
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+1.36.24.98181Energy Infrastructure 15.4 · Advanced

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Finland, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function17.4 Advanced → Established3.1% Possible · rank 74Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.6Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Strategic awareness failure13.3 Established → Transitional1.7% Possible · rank 18Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.0Quantum Technologies 12.3
Collapse in energy security12.0 Transitional → Foundational1.5% Possible · rank 12Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Loss of financial stability15.9 Advanced → Established1.5% Possible · rank 118Global funding seizure Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.2Resource Infrastructure 10
Broad fall in governance and integrity17.4 Advanced → Established1.4% Possible · rank 93Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Breakdown of information trust14.2 Established → Transitional1.1% Possible · rank 44Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Broad fall in information and influence13.1 Established → Transitional0.9% Unlikely · rank 34Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Diplomatic isolation14.2 Established → Transitional0.9% Unlikely · rank 29Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Failure of digital lifelines15.8 Advanced → Established0.9% Unlikely · rank 10Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Broad fall in financial strength15.4 Advanced → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 129Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Majorplans fail×3.5Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 13
Rule of law failure17.6 Advanced → Established0.7% Unlikely · rank 97Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×4.1Quantum Technologies 12.3
Rupture in trade and supply14.8 Established → Transitional0.6% Unlikely · rank 110Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.7Resource Infrastructure 10
Broad fall in national security11.0 Transitional → Foundational0.6% Unlikely · rank 18Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Defence readiness failure13.2 Established → Transitional0.6% Unlikely · rank 21Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.6Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure14.3 Established → Transitional0.5% Unlikely · rank 41Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Health system failure17.2 Advanced → Established0.4% Unlikely · rank 112Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Loss of industrial capacity14.9 Established → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 52Global funding seizure Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×4.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 13
Broad fall in trade and investment14.9 Established → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 94Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.7Resource Infrastructure 10
Broad fall in production and innovation15.5 Advanced → Established0.3% Unlikely · rank 68Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×4.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Food and water failure14.3 Established → Transitional0.3% Unlikely · rank 111Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×4.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Broad fall in human capital17.1 Advanced → Established0.2% Remote · rank 53Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×4.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Broad fall in critical technology11.7 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 30Trade bloc rupture Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×4.9Quantum Technologies 12.3
Loss of advanced technology base10.2 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 39Trade bloc rupture Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×5.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Loss of strategic deterrence5.8 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 17Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×4.8Resource Infrastructure 10
Education pipeline failure17.4 Advanced → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 97Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×4.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Reliable low-cost energy13.0 Established → Established18% Likely · rank 8Clean power threshold Severe×0.9Resource Infrastructure 10
Stronger health and biotechnology15.8 Advanced → Advanced15% Likely · rank 15Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Major×1.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Trusted public institutions17.4 Advanced → Frontier14% Likely · rank 10Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7 · reaches Frontier
Capable digital government17.1 Advanced → Frontier12% Likely · rank 14Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7 · reaches Frontier
Broad rise in governance and integrity17.4 Advanced → Frontier12% Likely · rank 11Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7 · reaches Frontier
Broad rise in critical technology11.7 Transitional → Established12% Likely · rank 12Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.4Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8.5
Research translated into value16.3 Advanced → Frontier10% Likely · rank 13Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.2Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8.5 · reaches Frontier
Higher-value manufacturing14.1 Established → Advanced8.1% Likely · rank 11Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.4Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8.5
Frontier AI and compute10.3 Transitional → Established6.6% Likely · rank 23Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.0Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8.5
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure14.3 Established → Advanced5.9% Likely · rank 13Clean power threshold Extreme×1.6Resource Infrastructure 10
Broad rise in financial strength15.4 Advanced → Advanced5.9% Likely · rank 4Chronic disease advance Extreme×1.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13
Broad rise in production and innovation15.5 Advanced → Advanced5.9% Likely · rank 12Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Major×1.4Resource Infrastructure 10
Sophisticated export strength15.1 Advanced → Advanced4.8% Possible · rank 16Great-power détente Severe + Clean power threshold Severe×1.7Resource Infrastructure 10
Broad rise in trade and investment14.9 Established → Advanced4.6% Possible · rank 15Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Higher-value international business15.3 Advanced → Advanced4.4% Possible · rank 14Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Broad rise in human capital17.1 Advanced → Frontier3.8% Possible · rank 18Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7 · reaches Frontier
Deeper long-term finance15.3 Advanced → Advanced3.6% Possible · rank 8Clean power threshold Extreme×1.5Resource Infrastructure 10
Secure food and water supply14.3 Established → Advanced3.3% Possible · rank 14Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Adaptable skilled workforce16.8 Advanced → Frontier3.3% Possible · rank 14Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7 · reaches Frontier
Assured space services8.9 Foundational → Transitional2.6% Possible · rank 10Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Wider international influence14.2 Established → Advanced1.6% Possible · rank 12Market access opening Major + Middle East settlement Extreme×1.5Alliances & Security Cooperation 14
Stronger information environment12.1 Established → Established1.5% Possible · rank 12Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Broad rise in information and influence13.1 Established → Established1.0% Unlikely · rank 16Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7
Broad rise in national security11.0 Transitional → Established0.3% Unlikely · rank 15Automated discovery step Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×2.0Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8.5
More deployable joint force12.9 Established → Established0.3% Unlikely · rank 15Automated discovery step Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×2.0Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8.5