Russia and Eurasia · GEO

Georgia

Baseline index 7.54Rank 72 of 197FoundationalRussia and EurasiaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
21.0
rank 100 of 197 · 3 years: 20.8
Worst case
−12.9%
Regional war spillover · tail −11.5%
Opportunity · 10 years
−4.7
rank 91 of 197 · 3 years: −4.4
Best case
+12
Clean power threshold · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed
31%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.27
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Hybrid coercion, Regional war spillover, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: land border with russia or belarus; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; youth unemployment rate; remittances relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population; share of population aged 65 and over.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Georgia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.94−0.97−1.37−0.60▼ 326Maritime Power 1 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.78−0.82−1.20−0.53▼ 324Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.8 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.84−0.81−1.06−0.47▼ 123Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.3 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.91−0.71−1.00−0.44▼ 622Maritime Power 1.1 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.68−0.68−1.00−0.44▼ 120Artificial Intelligence 2.3 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.56−0.60−0.83−0.37▼ 121Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.72−0.58−0.93−0.41▲ 118Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.3 · Foundational
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.58−0.47−0.73−0.32▼ 112Economic Output & Productivity 5.9 · Nascent
Core disaster S07Medium 0.48−0.41−0.67−0.29▲ 112Energy Infrastructure 6.2 · Foundational
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.34−0.36−0.53−0.23▲ 39Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 6.3 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.55−1.30−1.20−0.50−0.50−1.25−1.17−1.00−1.28
Severe pandemic−0.86−0.43−0.36−1.05−0.92−0.99−0.92−0.90−0.90
Cryptographic trust break−1.01−0.57−1.05·−1.28−1.20−1.12−0.48−0.55
Hybrid coercion−0.53−1.15−1.15·−1.28−1.32·−0.48−0.48
AI labour shock−0.75−0.34·−0.91−0.79−0.94−0.79−0.78−0.78
Trade bloc rupture−0.75−0.30−0.27−0.30−0.71−0.68−0.71−0.69−0.96
Legitimacy rupture−0.33−0.37−0.67−0.33−0.78−1.09−0.89−0.33−0.38
Global funding seizure−0.28−0.31·−0.32−0.28−0.64−1.04−0.73−0.65
Core disaster−0.02−0.62−0.20−0.49−0.22−0.56−0.59−0.51−0.51
Breadbasket failure−0.19−0.44−0.15−0.42−0.40−0.42−0.45−0.34−0.39
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Georgia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+12.216.74.52571Energy Technologies 2 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+3.220.517.331120Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+3.113.610.541100Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7 · Foundational
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+2.38.25.94468Energy Infrastructure 7.1 · Foundational
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+1.016.215.14165Energy Infrastructure 7.1 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−7.013.520.532111Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed−8.623.732.332123Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−14.77.222.01573Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−15.16.421.622132Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−15.56.521.930173Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4 · Nascent

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Georgia, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function10.8 Transitional → Foundational8.8% Likely · rank 2Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severe×1.8Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 6.3
Strategic awareness failure5.0 Nascent → Inception4.2% Possible · rank 1Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severe×1.9Quantum Technologies 1.3
Collapse in energy security5.2 Nascent → Inception2.4% Possible · rank 3Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×1.8Maritime Power 3
Rule of law failure11.2 Transitional → Foundational2.2% Possible · rank 7Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Quantum Technologies 1.3
Broad fall in governance and integrity10.8 Transitional → Foundational2.1% Possible · rank 37Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 6.3
Breakdown of information trust8.5 Foundational → Nascent1.7% Possible · rank 10Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 6.3
Loss of financial stability9.5 Transitional → Foundational1.7% Possible · rank 107Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Maritime Power 3
Rupture in trade and supply8.6 Foundational → Nascent1.5% Possible · rank 40Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Major×1.7Maritime Power 3
Broad fall in financial strength9.1 Transitional → Nascent1.4% Possible · rank 67Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 3
Broad fall in information and influence7.2 Foundational → Nascent1.3% Possible · rank 7Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 6.3
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure7.9 Foundational → Nascent1.2% Possible · rank 3Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 3
Defence readiness failure6.0 Nascent → Inception1.2% Possible · rank 4Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.4Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 6.3
Diplomatic isolation6.7 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 12Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 6.3
Broad fall in national security4.9 Nascent → Inception1.0% Unlikely · rank 4Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 1.3
Failure of digital lifelines7.6 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Unlikely · rank 6Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 6.3
Broad fall in trade and investment8.5 Foundational → Nascent0.7% Unlikely · rank 54Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 3
Food and water failure8.2 Foundational → Nascent0.7% Unlikely · rank 55Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.0Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 6.3
Health system failure9.7 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 118Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×1.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4
Loss of industrial capacity7.6 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 63Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×3.0Maritime Power 3
Broad fall in production and innovation7.9 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 56Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×3.0Maritime Power 3
Broad fall in human capital9.4 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 104Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4
Education pipeline failure10.4 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 83Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4
Broad fall in critical technology2.2 Inception— No route · rank 74Already at the foot of the scale×3.0—
Loss of advanced technology base1.4 Inception— No route · rank 74Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Loss of strategic deterrence1.9 Inception— No route · rank 75Already at the foot of the scale×3.0—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology7.6 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 77Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4
Broad rise in critical technology2.2 Inception— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.8—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure7.9 Foundational— No route · rank 75No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.4—
Broad rise in national security4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.7—
Broad rise in human capital9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.8—
Broad rise in information and influence7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.2—
Broad rise in governance and integrity10.8 Transitional— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.4—
Broad rise in financial strength9.1 Transitional— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.6—
Broad rise in production and innovation7.9 Foundational— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.7—
Broad rise in trade and investment8.5 Foundational— No route · rank 77No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.9—
Assured space services2.0 Inception— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.6—
Frontier AI and compute2.3 Inception— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.2—
Higher-value manufacturing5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.9—
Reliable low-cost energy4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 84No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.0—
Secure food and water supply8.2 Foundational— No route · rank 79No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.9—
More deployable joint force5.5 Nascent— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.3—
Adaptable skilled workforce8.5 Foundational— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.8—
Stronger information environment7.8 Foundational— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.7—
Wider international influence6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.4—
Capable digital government10.4 Transitional— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.2—
Trusted public institutions10.8 Transitional— No route · rank 87No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.4—
Deeper long-term finance8.6 Foundational— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.8—
Research translated into value7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.9—
Higher-value international business9.0 Transitional— No route · rank 79No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.7—
Sophisticated export strength8.4 Foundational— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—