South Asia · AFG

Afghanistan

Baseline index 1.46Rank 196 of 197InceptionSouth AsiaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Acute fragility. Every scenario is severe; there is little capability left to lose. One of 14 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
89.1
rank 4 of 197 · 3 years: 89.1
Worst case
−67.8%
Breadbasket failure · tail −61.7%
Opportunity · 10 years
−15.1
rank 165 of 197 · 3 years: −14.7
Best case
−0
Water-efficient food leap · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
6%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.29
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
0of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Breadbasket failure, Regional war spillover, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; staple foods among the top five imports; no coastline; low life expectancy at birth; low real gdp per head; share of population aged under 15.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Afghanistan’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Breadbasket failure S06High 0.80−0.99−1.06−0.5209Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 0 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03High 0.84−0.89−0.93−0.47▼ 19Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.70−0.83−0.90−0.4309Financial System Depth & Access 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.76−0.76−0.79−0.39▲ 28Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08Medium 0.54−0.61−0.64−0.3106Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.43−0.54−0.58−0.26▲ 18Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09Medium 0.42−0.42−0.43−0.20▲ 15Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.36−0.39−0.41−0.18▲ 36Financial Stability & Crisis Management 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Low 0.28−0.33−0.35−0.15▲ 17Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Low 0.35−0.31−0.33−0.15▼ 15Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Breadbasket failure−0.02−1.40−0.37−1.31−1.15−1.31−1.33−0.93−1.12
Regional war spillover−0.02−1.42−0.61−0.59−0.59−1.39−1.25−0.98−1.15
Core disaster−0.02−1.31−0.33−1.05−0.47−1.15−1.12−0.95−1.04
Legitimacy rupture−0.02−0.59−0.69−0.54−1.16−1.41−1.32−0.53−0.56
AI labour shock−0.02−0.38·−0.90−0.89−0.88−0.87−0.76−0.79
Severe pandemic−0.02−0.33−0.23−0.79−0.70−0.75−0.70−0.65−0.68
Cryptographic trust break−0.02−0.37−0.46·−0.81−0.76−0.67−0.30−0.35
Global funding seizure−0.02−0.28·−0.28−0.25−0.57−0.92−0.65−0.53
Trade bloc rupture−0.02−0.20−0.16−0.20−0.46−0.43−0.46−0.45−0.62
Hybrid coercion−0.02−0.58−0.40·−0.65−0.67·−0.24−0.24
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Afghanistan is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−0.14.54.65105Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed−6.12.38.46109Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed−6.52.18.65165Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−6.92.49.310182Financial System Depth & Access 1.4 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−9.54.514.010160Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 1.5 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−15.24.119.36142Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 0.7 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−16.83.820.65163Energy Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−28.83.532.44196Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−29.50.730.23181Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−34.50.535.01171Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Afghanistan, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Food and water failure3.4 Nascent → Inception3.0% Possible · rank 7Breadbasket failure Extreme×1.4Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 0.6
Health system failure3.5 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 35Breadbasket failure Major + Core disaster Extreme×1.8Financial System Depth & Access 1.4
Broad fall in critical technology0.0 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×150—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure2.3 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Broad fall in national security1.1 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×4.4—
Broad fall in human capital2.2 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Broad fall in information and influence1.7 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Broad fall in governance and integrity1.9 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Broad fall in financial strength1.5 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Broad fall in production and innovation1.3 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×3.0—
Broad fall in trade and investment1.3 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale——
Collapse in energy security1.4 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Failure of digital lifelines1.6 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×3.8—
Defence readiness failure1.7 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×14—
Strategic awareness failure0.9 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×4.8—
Education pipeline failure2.4 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×2.2—
Breakdown of information trust1.7 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×2.0—
Diplomatic isolation1.3 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Breakdown of state function2.4 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×1.7—
Rule of law failure1.6 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Loss of financial stability1.7 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Loss of industrial capacity1.6 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Rupture in trade and supply1.8 Inception— No route · rank 196Already at the foot of the scale×1.8—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.0 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×20—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure2.3 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×17—
Broad rise in national security1.1 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.1 of 1.5×20—
Broad rise in human capital2.2 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×20—
Broad rise in information and influence1.7 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×17—
Broad rise in governance and integrity1.9 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×16—
Broad rise in financial strength1.5 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×23—
Broad rise in production and innovation1.3 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×19—
Broad rise in trade and investment1.3 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×16—
Assured space services0.3 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.1 of 1.5×30—
Frontier AI and compute0.0 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×22—
Higher-value manufacturing0.7 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×22—
Reliable low-cost energy1.2 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Secure food and water supply3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×11—
More deployable joint force1.2 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.1 of 1.5×22—
Adaptable skilled workforce1.2 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×18—
Stronger health and biotechnology2.3 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×17—
Stronger information environment2.0 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×22—
Wider international influence1.3 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Capable digital government2.3 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Trusted public institutions1.3 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Deeper long-term finance1.3 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×21—
Research translated into value1.0 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×17—
Higher-value international business0.7 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Sophisticated export strength1.4 Inception— No route · rank 196No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×18—