A disputed transfer of power breaks effective government
How far each nation’s capability index falls when this scenario’s load is applied to its capability scores, after its own buffers absorb what they can.
Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.
- Typical nation
- −0.62
- median change in index, points
- Hardest hit
- −1.01
- Sudan
- Lose a domain band
- 146
- of 197 nations
- Worth of best practice
- +0.22
- mean points recovered over current plans
Change in index, by region
One dot per nation. The bar marks each region’s mean. Further left is a larger fall.
- Region mean
Does capability protect?
Each nation’s baseline index against its fall. Stronger nations absorb more of the shock, so they sit higher; so do nations with low exposure.
- North America
- Europe
- China
- Indo-Pacific
- South Asia
- Gulf and Middle East
- Africa
- Latin America and Caribbean
- Russia and Eurasia
Where the load lands
Mean change in each capability domain across all nations.
Capability domainMean change, points
Governance & Integrity
Financial Strength
Information & Influence
National Security
Trade & Investment
Strategic Infrastructure
Human Capital
Production & Innovation
Critical Technology
−1.13
−0.93
−0.81
−0.64
−0.40
−0.39
−0.35
−0.35
−0.26
What policy is worth
The 20 hardest-hit nations under three policy responses. The distance from no response to current plans is what current buffers absorb; from current plans to best practice is what best practice would add.
All 197 nations
Rank shift is the change in the nation’s place among all nations once every index is stressed: up means it held up better than its neighbours. The weakest point is the capability left lowest among those the scenario singles out.
197 of 197 nations
Nation | Region | Exposure | Baseline | Stressed | Change | % | Rank shift | Bands lost | Absorbed | Weakest point |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sudan | Africa | High 0.88 | 2.61 | 1.60 | −1.01 | −38.6 | ▼ 3 | 18 · 2d | 8% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception |
| Syria | Gulf and Middle East | High 0.94 | 2.22 | 1.24 | −0.98 | −44.1 | ▼ 5 | 16 · 3d | 7% | Political Institutions & Civic Participation 0 · Inception |
| Haiti | Latin America and Caribbean | High 0.95 | 2.03 | 1.05 | −0.98 | −48.3 | ▼ 3 | 8 | 8% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception |
| Somalia | Africa | High 0.94 | 1.62 | 0.66 | −0.96 | −59.3 | ▼ 1 | 6 | 8% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception |
| Palestine | Gulf and Middle East | High 0.94 | 3.72 | 2.76 | −0.95 | −25.6 | ▼ 4 | 20 · 3d | 18% | Monetary & Currency Capability 0.7 · Inception |
| Tajikistan | Russia and Eurasia | High 0.90 | 4.01 | 3.06 | −0.94 | −23.5 | ▼ 9 | 18 · 1d | 16% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 1.1 · Inception |
| Yemen | Gulf and Middle East | High 0.97 | 1.62 | 0.70 | −0.93 | −57.2 | ▼ 1 | 7 | 5% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception |
| Angola | Africa | High 0.90 | 4.60 | 3.68 | −0.92 | −20.1 | ▼ 2 | 19 · 2d | 19% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 1.8 · Inception |
| Venezuela | Latin America and Caribbean | High 0.84 | 4.55 | 3.64 | −0.92 | −20.2 | ▼ 2 | 31 · 3d | 15% | Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 0.6 · Inception |
| Congo | Africa | High 0.86 | 3.19 | 2.28 | −0.91 | −28.6 | ▼ 5 | 26 · 5d | 14% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0.1 · Inception |
| Libya | Africa | High 0.80 | 3.01 | 2.10 | −0.91 | −30.3 | ▼ 6 | 25 | 10% | Justice System & Fundamental Rights 0.3 · Inception |
| Zimbabwe | Africa | High 0.87 | 4.34 | 3.44 | −0.90 | −20.7 | ▼ 2 | 18 · 3d | 19% | Monetary & Currency Capability 0.9 · Inception |
| DR Congo | Africa | High 0.84 | 2.87 | 1.97 | −0.90 | −31.5 | ▼ 2 | 24 · 5d | 13% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0.5 · Inception |
| Lebanon | Gulf and Middle East | High 0.87 | 4.66 | 3.76 | −0.89 | −19.2 | ▼ 2 | 27 · 3d | 21% | Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 0.9 · Inception |
| Djibouti | Africa | High 0.83 | 3.20 | 2.32 | −0.89 | −27.7 | ▼ 4 | 21 · 3d | 13% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0.5 · Inception |
| South Sudan | Africa | High 0.93 | 1.38 | 0.49 | −0.89 | −64.7 | 0 | 3 | 6% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception |
| Eritrea | Africa | High 0.83 | 2.01 | 1.13 | −0.88 | −43.7 | ▼ 1 | 10 · 1d | 5% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception |
| Iraq | Gulf and Middle East | High 0.84 | 4.69 | 3.83 | −0.86 | −18.4 | ▼ 2 | 20 · 1d | 20% | Investment Attraction & Projection 2.3 · Inception |
| Lesotho | Africa | High 0.90 | 3.43 | 2.57 | −0.86 | −25.0 | ▼ 2 | 19 · 1d | 20% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception |
| Equatorial Guinea | Africa | High 0.77 | 2.80 | 1.94 | −0.86 | −30.5 | 0 | 25 · 2d | 8% | Political Institutions & Civic Participation 0 · Inception |
| Iran | Gulf and Middle East | High 0.85 | 8.17 | 7.33 | −0.84 | −10.2 | ▼ 3 | 18 · 2d | 25% | Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 2.4 · Inception |
| Turkmenistan | Russia and Eurasia | High 0.74 | 3.55 | 2.71 | −0.84 | −23.6 | ▼ 2 | 22 · 6d | 9% | Political Institutions & Civic Participation 0 · Inception |
| Eswatini | Africa | High 0.82 | 3.71 | 2.88 | −0.83 | −22.4 | ▼ 1 | 16 | 16% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception |
| Mauritania | Africa | High 0.80 | 3.58 | 2.75 | −0.83 | −23.2 | ▼ 1 | 11 · 2d | 18% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 1 · Inception |
| Guinea | Africa | High 0.78 | 3.15 | 2.32 | −0.83 | −26.3 | ▼ 1 | 24 · 4d | 14% | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0.3 · Inception |
Showing 1–25 of 197 nations · page 1 of 8
Settings of this run
- Load
11 capability groups singled out, 73 loaded in all, of 73. A band on the capability scale is three points wide, so a High load moves a fully exposed, unprotected capability down one band. A capability group that the scenario does not single out takes its domain's load one level lower.
- Singled out
- Social Infrastructure· Medium
- Force Generation & Mobilisation· High
- Information Environment & Strategic Communication· High
- Political Institutions & Civic Participation· High
- Justice System & Fundamental Rights· High
- Internal Security & Order· High
- Government Effectiveness & Public Administration· High
- Transparency, Oversight & Accountability· High
- Monetary & Currency Capability· High
- Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance· High
- Investment Attraction & Projection· Medium
- Buffers
- Political Institutions & Civic Participation
- Justice System & Fundamental Rights
- Transparency, Oversight & Accountability
- Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption
- Information Environment & Strategic Communication
- National Resilience & Crisis Management
Absorption is the nation's mean score on the scenario's buffer capabilities as a share of the top of the scale, times 0.75: a nation at the frontier on every buffer absorbs three quarters of the shock.
- Exposure
regional exposure (45%); youth unemployment rate (ranked) (20%); low real gdp per head (ranked) (20%); consumer price inflation (ranked) (15%). Exposure is set nation by nation: a weighted blend of indicators from the 2025 World Factbook and the scenario's regional exposure. Where a nation does not report an indicator, its weight passes to the others.
- Likelihood
1 per cent over three years and 3 per cent over ten, as used in the vulnerability index.