A great-power agreement lowers economic security barriers
How much of this scenario’s gain each nation is ready to take, set against what it stands to lose and how well it can adapt.
Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.
- Gainers
- 25
- net position above +10
- Mixed
- 70
- between the two
- Losers
- 102
- net position below -10
- Largest net gain
- +52
- United Kingdom
Net position, by region
One dot per nation. The bar marks each region’s mean. Filled dots are net gains; hollow dots are net losses.
- Region mean
- Net gain
- Net loss
Readiness against outcome
Each nation’s readiness to take the gain against its net position. Nations below the zero line lose more than they capture.
- North America
- Europe
- China
- Indo-Pacific
- South Asia
- Gulf and Middle East
- Africa
- Latin America and Caribbean
- Russia and Eurasia
Mean net position by region
Loss exposure in this scenario: capacity built behind tariffs and controls, trade and investment won by diversion, and leverage or security assumptions that depended on the rivalry.
All 197 nations
Capture is gain exposure times readiness. Loss is loss exposure times what adaptability does not cover. The binding capability is the weakest of those the scenario requires: raising it raises the capture rate most.
197 of 197 nations
Rank | Nation | Region | Position | Net | Capture | Loss | Readiness | Adaptability | Binding capability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Kingdom | Europe | Gainer | +51.5 | 59.1 | 7.6 | 77 | 81 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 14 · Established |
| 2 | South Korea | Indo-Pacific | Gainer | +50.1 | 60.7 | 10.6 | 78 | 81 | Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 14.5 · Established |
| 3 | Singapore | Indo-Pacific | Gainer | +49.0 | 57.2 | 8.2 | 77 | 84 | Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 14 · Established |
| 4 | China | China | Gainer | +35.8 | 39.6 | 3.8 | 75 | 74 | Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 13.3 · Established |
| 5 | Japan | Indo-Pacific | Gainer | +35.2 | 44.5 | 9.3 | 83 | 83 | Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 16 · Advanced |
| 7 | Canada | North America | Gainer | +34.8 | 46.0 | 11.2 | 63 | 79 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 10.2 · Transitional |
| 6 | Netherlands | Europe | Gainer | +34.8 | 41.1 | 6.3 | 76 | 82 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 14 · Established |
| 8 | Germany | Europe | Gainer | +33.4 | 38.8 | 5.4 | 84 | 86 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 16.2 · Advanced |
| 9 | Switzerland | Europe | Gainer | +31.2 | 37.4 | 6.2 | 62 | 84 | Alliances & Security Cooperation 9.5 · Transitional |
| 10 | United States | North America | Gainer | +26.6 | 32.1 | 5.5 | 89 | 84 | Export Capability & Sophistication 17 · Advanced |
| 11 | Sweden | Europe | Gainer | +26.2 | 32.1 | 5.8 | 63 | 84 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 9.8 · Transitional |
| 12 | Belgium | Europe | Gainer | +26.0 | 35.0 | 9.0 | 65 | 73 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 11.3 · Transitional |
| 13 | France | Europe | Gainer | +25.6 | 31.4 | 5.8 | 80 | 83 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 14.8 · Established |
| 15 | Ireland | Europe | Gainer | +24.6 | 37.4 | 12.7 | 53 | 71 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8 · Foundational |
| 14 | Taiwan | Indo-Pacific | Gainer | +24.6 | 44.8 | 20.2 | 53 | 69 | Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7 · Foundational |
| 16 | Austria | Europe | Gainer | +21.8 | 30.3 | 8.6 | 59 | 76 | Alliances & Security Cooperation 10 · Transitional |
| 17 | Israel | Gulf and Middle East | Gainer | +19.9 | 29.6 | 9.7 | 60 | 68 | Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 10.3 · Transitional |
| 18 | Finland | Europe | Gainer | +19.8 | 26.9 | 7.1 | 57 | 81 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8.5 · Foundational |
| 19 | Denmark | Europe | Gainer | +19.5 | 26.9 | 7.4 | 48 | 80 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.2 · Nascent |
| 20 | Malaysia | Indo-Pacific | Gainer | +19.2 | 41.5 | 22.3 | 57 | 63 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 9.8 · Transitional |
| 21 | United Arab Emirates | Gulf and Middle East | Gainer | +15.8 | 22.4 | 6.6 | 41 | 67 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3.5 · Nascent |
| 22 | Australia | Indo-Pacific | Gainer | +14.3 | 26.5 | 12.2 | 51 | 77 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.2 · Foundational |
| 23 | Italy | Europe | Gainer | +14.0 | 25.8 | 11.8 | 65 | 67 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 11.3 · Transitional |
| 24 | Norway | Europe | Gainer | +13.5 | 19.5 | 6.0 | 51 | 81 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.8 · Nascent |
| 25 | Czechia | Europe | Gainer | +11.1 | 22.9 | 11.8 | 47 | 63 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.8 · Foundational |
Showing 1–25 of 197 nations · page 1 of 8
Settings of this run
- Required
- Trade Policy & Market Access
- Export Capability & Sophistication
- Global Value Chain Position
- Trade Facilitation & Logistics
- Semiconductors & Advanced Computing
- Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls
- Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks
- Alliances & Security Cooperation
- Investment Attraction & Projection
Readiness is the average of the mean and the minimum of the nation's scores on the capabilities the scenario requires, as a share of the top of the scale. The minimum holds it down: the weakest required capability limits the gain.
- Adaptive
- Structural Transformation & Complexity
- Government Effectiveness & Public Administration
- Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance
- Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks
- Lifelong Learning & Reskilling
- Gain exposure
regional exposure (40%); trade in goods and services relative to gdp (ranked) (30%); share of exports going to china and the united states (30%).
- Loss exposure
Capacity built behind tariffs and controls, trade and investment won by diversion, and leverage or security assumptions that depended on the rivalry: regional exposure (80%); share of exports going to china and the united states (20%). Gain and loss exposure are set nation by nation from indicators where one fits, and by region with named exceptions where none does.
- Likelihood
0 per cent over three years and 3 per cent over ten, as used in the opportunity index.