Europe · AND

Andorra

Baseline index 5.16Rank 116 of 197NascentEuropeAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
30.2
rank 72 of 197 · 3 years: 29.9
Worst case
−18.4%
Regional war spillover · tail −17.4%
Opportunity · 10 years
−9.3
rank 119 of 197 · 3 years: −9.0
Best case
+14
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed
23%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.31
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
5of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Hybrid coercion, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: no coastline; internet users as a share of population; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; urban share of population; share of population aged 65 and over; services as a share of gdp; adult obesity rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Andorra’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.96−0.95−1.12−0.50▼ 225Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.91−0.89−1.20−0.54▼ 321Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.90−0.85−1.17−0.53▼ 319Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.93−0.73−0.86−0.41014Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.67−0.70−0.84−0.37▼ 117Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.73−0.62−0.86−0.38▲ 116Investment Attraction & Projection 2.4 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.77−0.58−0.65−0.31▼ 314Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.49−0.36−0.55−0.25▲ 410Force Generation & Mobilisation 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.33−0.35−0.48−0.21▲ 410Agriculture & Food Infrastructure 2.5 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.36−0.29−0.47−0.21▲ 78Energy Infrastructure 3.2 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.17−1.23−0.27−0.60−0.60−1.50−1.40−1.20−1.55
Severe pandemic−0.20−0.47−0.17−1.33−1.16−1.25−1.16−1.14−1.14
AI labour shock−0.20−0.41·−1.28−1.12−1.32−1.12−1.10−1.10
Cryptographic trust break−0.20−0.59−0.28·−1.47−1.42−1.33−0.57−0.65
Trade bloc rupture−0.20−0.36−0.15−0.42−0.98−0.94−0.98−0.96−1.32
Global funding seizure−0.13−0.38·−0.43−0.39−0.88−1.43−1.00−0.89
Hybrid coercion−0.18−1.04−0.28·−1.34−1.39·−0.51−0.51
Legitimacy rupture−0.10−0.24−0.16−0.24−0.55−0.77−0.63−0.24−0.27
Breadbasket failure−0.09−0.43−0.07−0.45−0.43−0.46−0.49−0.37−0.42
Core disaster−0.02−0.41−0.06−0.36−0.16−0.41−0.43−0.37−0.37
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Andorra is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+14.316.92.61973Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+9.19.60.51590Energy Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+5.06.81.81993Intelligence & Assessment 0.8 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−2.24.76.92486Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−10.311.922.125120Transport Infrastructure 3.9 · Nascent
Debt service reset S11 ↗Loser−12.90.613.635195Energy Infrastructure 3.9 · Nascent
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−15.13.118.217166Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−17.25.722.8685Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−18.15.623.79154Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−18.617.936.523169Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Andorra, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function11.9 Transitional → Foundational5.8% Likely · rank 16Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×1.7Intelligence & Assessment 0.8
Loss of financial stability7.3 Foundational → Nascent4.9% Possible · rank 7Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severe×1.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Broad fall in governance and integrity11.0 Transitional → Foundational3.5% Possible · rank 8Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Extreme×2.0Intelligence & Assessment 0.8
Rupture in trade and supply4.0 Nascent → Inception3.2% Possible · rank 11Regional war spillover Extreme×1.4Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in financial strength7.2 Foundational → Nascent2.8% Possible · rank 8Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Majorplans fail×2.1Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Rule of law failure10.9 Transitional → Foundational2.0% Possible · rank 8Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.0Quantum Technologies 0
Health system failure13.0 Established → Transitional1.4% Possible · rank 20Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×1.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2
Loss of industrial capacity5.4 Nascent → Inception1.3% Possible · rank 4Global funding seizure Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2
Broad fall in trade and investment4.5 Nascent → Inception1.2% Possible · rank 20Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×1.9Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in production and innovation5.9 Nascent → Inception0.9% Unlikely · rank 5Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Severe×2.5Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in human capital9.9 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 5Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2
Education pipeline failure10.7 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 3Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2
Food and water failure6.6 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 91Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.5Intelligence & Assessment 0.8
Failure of digital lifelines5.6 Nascent → Inception0.2% Unlikely · rank 66Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.4Intelligence & Assessment 0.8
Breakdown of information trust5.2 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 165Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.1Quantum Technologies 0
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure4.9 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 141Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.4Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 117Already at the foot of the scale×15—
Broad fall in national security0.3 Inception— No route · rank 123Already at the foot of the scale×11—
Broad fall in information and influence2.6 Inception— No route · rank 157Already at the foot of the scale×2.0—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 117Already at the foot of the scale×86—
Collapse in energy security1.4 Inception— No route · rank 135Already at the foot of the scale×3.1—
Defence readiness failure0.1 Inception— No route · rank 137Already at the foot of the scale×36—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.1 Inception— No route · rank 117Already at the foot of the scale×27—
Strategic awareness failure0.7 Inception— No route · rank 122Already at the foot of the scale×4.2—
Diplomatic isolation2.4 Inception— No route · rank 165Already at the foot of the scale×2.0—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Broad rise in national security0.3 Inception— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Broad rise in human capital9.9 Transitional— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.0—
Broad rise in information and influence2.6 Inception— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.1—
Broad rise in governance and integrity11.0 Transitional— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.3—
Broad rise in financial strength7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.8—
Broad rise in production and innovation5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.9—
Broad rise in trade and investment4.5 Nascent— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.2—
Assured space services0.1 Inception— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.8—
Frontier AI and compute0.3 Inception— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.6—
Higher-value manufacturing1.7 Inception— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.9—
Reliable low-cost energy2.0 Inception— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.2—
Secure food and water supply6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.9—
More deployable joint force0.1 Inception— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Adaptable skilled workforce8.5 Foundational— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.9—
Stronger health and biotechnology8.7 Foundational— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.4—
Stronger information environment2.7 Inception— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.4—
Wider international influence2.4 Inception— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.9—
Capable digital government10.3 Transitional— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.2—
Trusted public institutions10.1 Transitional— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.5—
Deeper long-term finance7.1 Foundational— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.4—
Research translated into value4.5 Nascent— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.9—
Higher-value international business6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.0—
Sophisticated export strength4.0 Nascent— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.9—