Russia and Eurasia · ARM

Armenia

Baseline index 6.65Rank 89 of 197FoundationalRussia and EurasiaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
24.3
rank 90 of 197 · 3 years: 24.0
Worst case
−16.0%
Regional war spillover · tail −13.9%
Opportunity · 10 years
−8.8
rank 114 of 197 · 3 years: −8.5
Best case
+12
Clean power threshold · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed
27%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.30
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Trade bloc rupture, Hybrid coercion. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; no coastline; refugees hosted per head of population; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; youth unemployment rate; internet users as a share of population; few months of imports covered by reserves.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Armenia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.98−1.07−1.40−0.61▼ 122Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.81−0.90−1.25−0.55▼ 117Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.83−0.81−1.04−0.46011Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.5 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.68−0.78−1.01−0.45▼ 219Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.67−0.70−0.99−0.43017Artificial Intelligence 2.6 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.71−0.61−0.91−0.40011Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.2 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02High 0.65−0.57−0.82−0.36012Investment Attraction & Projection 4.3 · Nascent
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.71−0.57−0.76−0.34▼ 110Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.56−0.51−0.78−0.34▲ 115Transport Infrastructure 5.3 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.42−0.47−0.65−0.29012Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 4.6 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.62−1.45−1.14−0.56−0.56−1.40−1.30−1.12−1.44
Severe pandemic−0.94−0.48−0.38−1.17−1.02−1.10−1.02−1.00−1.00
Cryptographic trust break−1.04−0.58−1.00·−1.29−1.21−1.13−0.49−0.55
Trade bloc rupture−1.02−0.40−0.34−0.40−0.93−0.89−0.93−0.91−1.25
AI labour shock−0.77−0.35·−0.94−0.82−0.97−0.82−0.80−0.80
Legitimacy rupture−0.36−0.40−0.67−0.36−0.84−1.17−0.96−0.36−0.41
Global funding seizure−0.34−0.37·−0.38−0.34−0.77−1.25−0.88−0.78
Hybrid coercion−0.43−0.94−0.81·−1.05−1.08·−0.39−0.39
Core disaster−0.03−0.77−0.25−0.61−0.28−0.69−0.74−0.63−0.63
Breadbasket failure−0.25−0.58−0.20−0.55−0.52−0.56−0.60−0.45−0.51
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Armenia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+11.816.74.92475Energy Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+3.29.76.54158Financial System Depth & Access 7 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+0.812.311.533117Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 5.5 · Nascent
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed−1.518.019.426149Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−6.813.520.33395Investment Attraction & Projection 5.7 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−9.812.422.229127Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−15.519.134.628156Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−17.77.425.125183Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−18.38.026.320157Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.8 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−19.67.927.51692Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.8 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Armenia, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function9.4 Transitional → Foundational5.7% Likely · rank 17Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severe×1.8Maritime Power 0.3
Rupture in trade and supply6.1 Foundational → Nascent3.4% Possible · rank 6Regional war spillover Extreme×1.5Maritime Power 0.3
Loss of financial stability8.2 Foundational → Nascent2.9% Possible · rank 41Global funding seizure Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 0.3
Broad fall in governance and integrity9.1 Transitional → Foundational2.7% Possible · rank 16Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.1Quantum Technologies 1.5
Breakdown of information trust6.9 Foundational → Nascent1.8% Possible · rank 8Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 1.5
Collapse in energy security5.1 Nascent → Inception1.8% Possible · rank 11Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×1.6Maritime Power 0.3
Broad fall in financial strength7.9 Foundational → Nascent1.6% Possible · rank 58Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 0.3
Rule of law failure9.2 Transitional → Foundational1.5% Possible · rank 16Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 1.5
Strategic awareness failure4.4 Nascent → Inception1.4% Possible · rank 32Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.9Quantum Technologies 1.5
Broad fall in trade and investment6.4 Foundational → Nascent1.4% Possible · rank 16Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extreme×2.1Maritime Power 0.3
Diplomatic isolation5.2 Nascent → Inception1.3% Possible · rank 7Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 1.5
Broad fall in information and influence6.7 Foundational → Nascent1.2% Possible · rank 10Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 1.5
Health system failure9.3 Transitional → Foundational1.2% Possible · rank 26Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×1.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure6.9 Foundational → Nascent1.2% Possible · rank 4Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 0.3
Failure of digital lifelines6.7 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 13Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 1.5
Loss of industrial capacity6.7 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 15Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 0.3
Broad fall in production and innovation7.2 Foundational → Nascent0.7% Unlikely · rank 14Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 0.3
Food and water failure7.6 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 59Regional war spillover Extreme + Breadbasket failure Majorplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 0.3
Broad fall in national security4.5 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 40Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.6Intelligence & Assessment 5.7
Broad fall in human capital9.0 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 33Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8
Education pipeline failure9.9 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 78Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8
Defence readiness failure5.2 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 90Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.3Maritime Power 0.3
Broad fall in critical technology2.4 Inception— No route · rank 90Already at the foot of the scale×2.9—
Loss of advanced technology base1.8 Inception— No route · rank 90Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Loss of strategic deterrence2.4 Inception— No route · rank 90Already at the foot of the scale×2.7—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology2.4 Inception— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.8—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×5.0—
Broad rise in national security4.5 Nascent— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.4—
Broad rise in human capital9.0 Foundational— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.7—
Broad rise in information and influence6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Broad rise in governance and integrity9.1 Transitional— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
Broad rise in financial strength7.9 Foundational— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.5—
Broad rise in production and innovation7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.7—
Broad rise in trade and investment6.4 Foundational— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.7—
Assured space services1.8 Inception— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.3—
Frontier AI and compute2.9 Inception— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.2—
Higher-value manufacturing4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.6—
Reliable low-cost energy5.3 Nascent— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.0—
Secure food and water supply7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 91No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.6—
More deployable joint force4.5 Nascent— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.1—
Adaptable skilled workforce7.8 Foundational— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.6—
Stronger health and biotechnology7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×3.1—
Stronger information environment8.2 Foundational— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.2—
Wider international influence5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.9—
Capable digital government9.5 Transitional— No route · rank 98No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.9—
Trusted public institutions8.7 Foundational— No route · rank 96No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
Deeper long-term finance7.3 Foundational— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Research translated into value6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
Higher-value international business7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 91No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.4—
Sophisticated export strength6.8 Foundational— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.6—