Europe · AUT

Austria

Baseline index 12.80Rank 23 of 197EstablishedEuropeAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
9.2
rank 168 of 197 · 3 years: 9.1
Worst case
−6.2%
Regional war spillover · tail −5.2%
Opportunity · 10 years
+27.3
rank 17 of 197 · 3 years: +27.4
Best case
+47
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 7 of 10
Shock absorbed
50%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.09
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Hybrid coercion, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: no coastline; internet users as a share of population; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; refugees hosted per head of population; share of population aged 65 and over; few months of imports covered by reserves; public debt relative to gdp; trade in goods and services relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Austria’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.92−0.80−1.31−0.56▼ 229Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.90−0.60−1.13−0.49▲ 122Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 5.9 · Nascent
Severe pandemic S10High 0.81−0.59−1.25−0.53022Information Environment & Strategic Communication 9.2 · Transitional
AI labour shock S08High 0.85−0.57−1.26−0.53▲ 120Artificial Intelligence 8.8 · Foundational
Global funding seizure S02High 0.87−0.48−1.08−0.46016Financial System Depth & Access 13.2 · Established
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.73−0.48−0.79−0.34▼ 113Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.63−0.45−0.94−0.41015Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 10.3 · Transitional
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.39−0.29−0.60−0.26012Agriculture & Food Infrastructure 10.7 · Transitional
Core disaster S07Medium 0.50−0.29−0.70−0.29▲ 113Energy Infrastructure 11.3 · Transitional
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.44−0.26−0.56−0.2409Force Generation & Mobilisation 9.4 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.46−1.09−0.86−0.42−0.42−1.05−0.98−0.84−1.08
Cryptographic trust break−0.78−0.43−0.74·−0.95−0.89−0.83−0.36−0.41
Severe pandemic−0.63−0.31−0.25−0.76−0.67−0.72−0.67−0.65−0.65
AI labour shock−0.63−0.29·−0.77−0.67−0.79−0.67−0.66−0.66
Global funding seizure−0.29−0.32·−0.32−0.29−0.65−1.06−0.74−0.66
Hybrid coercion−0.36−0.79−0.68·−0.88−0.91·−0.33−0.33
Trade bloc rupture−0.59−0.23−0.20−0.23−0.53−0.51−0.53−0.52−0.71
Breadbasket failure−0.15−0.36−0.12−0.34−0.32−0.35−0.37−0.28−0.32
Core disaster−0.02−0.43−0.14−0.34−0.15−0.39−0.41−0.35−0.35
Legitimacy rupture−0.15−0.17−0.30−0.15−0.36−0.50−0.41−0.15−0.17
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Austria is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+47.048.21.26221Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.3 · Transitional
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+45.946.10.25416Energy Technologies 8 · Foundational
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Gainer+39.950.510.65717Artificial Intelligence 10 · Transitional
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+32.047.915.87020Biotechnology & Health Technologies 12.8 · Established
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+28.028.70.75522Intelligence & Assessment 8.5 · Foundational
Great-power détente S13 ↗Gainer+21.830.38.65916Alliances & Security Cooperation 10 · Transitional
Market access opening S12 ↗Gainer+18.730.011.36719Energy Infrastructure 11.9 · Transitional
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+9.813.23.46231Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 10.4 · Transitional
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+3.99.96.16583Agriculture & Food Infrastructure 11.3 · Transitional
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−1.93.85.867122Energy Infrastructure 11.9 · Transitional

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Austria, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function15.8 Advanced → Established3.5% Possible · rank 63Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.4Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 7.3
Loss of financial stability15.1 Advanced → Transitional2.4% Possible · rank 62Global funding seizure Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 0.3
Broad fall in financial strength14.6 Established → Transitional1.9% Possible · rank 34Global funding seizure Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.8Maritime Power 0.3
Broad fall in governance and integrity15.3 Advanced → Established1.5% Possible · rank 80Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.9Maritime Power 0.3
Strategic awareness failure7.7 Foundational → Nascent1.4% Possible · rank 33Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 7.3
Collapse in energy security9.7 Transitional → Foundational1.3% Possible · rank 20Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 0.3
Breakdown of information trust12.6 Established → Transitional0.9% Unlikely · rank 53Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.2Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 7.3
Rupture in trade and supply13.7 Established → Transitional0.9% Unlikely · rank 96Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.0Maritime Power 0.3
Diplomatic isolation12.3 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 50Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.2Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 7.3
Failure of digital lifelines13.4 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 21Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.2Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 7.3
Broad fall in information and influence11.8 Transitional → Foundational0.7% Unlikely · rank 57Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.2Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 7.3
Rule of law failure14.9 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 102Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.2Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 7.3
Broad fall in trade and investment14.5 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 57Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.8Maritime Power 0.3
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure12.8 Established → Transitional0.6% Unlikely · rank 34Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.8Maritime Power 0.3
Health system failure15.8 Advanced → Established0.6% Unlikely · rank 96Global funding seizure Major + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.6Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.3
Broad fall in production and innovation15.0 Advanced → Transitional0.5% Unlikely · rank 32Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 12.4
Loss of industrial capacity15.1 Advanced → Transitional0.5% Unlikely · rank 38Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 12.4
Loss of advanced technology base9.8 Transitional → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 11Trade bloc rupture Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×4.2Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 7.3
Broad fall in human capital15.8 Advanced → Established0.2% Unlikely · rank 36Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.3
Broad fall in critical technology9.9 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Unlikely · rank 22Trade bloc rupture Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.8Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 7.3
Broad fall in national security5.4 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 54Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.5Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 7.3
Food and water failure13.3 Established → Transitional0.2% Remote · rank 131Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.6Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 7.3
Education pipeline failure16.4 Advanced → Established0.1% Remote · rank 82Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×4.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.3
Defence readiness failure5.8 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 98Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×4.3Maritime Power 0.3
Loss of strategic deterrence2.4 Inception— No route · rank 46Already at the foot of the scale×3.6—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Frontier AI and compute10.6 Transitional → Established17% Likely · rank 14Automated discovery step Severe×1.0Artificial Intelligence 10
Capable digital government15.0 Established → Advanced11% Likely · rank 18Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.3
Stronger health and biotechnology14.8 Established → Advanced10% Likely · rank 21Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.3
Broad rise in governance and integrity15.3 Advanced → Advanced7.6% Likely · rank 21Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.3
Broad rise in critical technology9.9 Transitional → Transitional6.5% Likely · rank 18Automated discovery step Severe + Chronic disease advance Major×1.3Artificial Intelligence 10
Trusted public institutions14.9 Established → Advanced5.9% Likely · rank 22Automated discovery step Extreme×1.6Artificial Intelligence 10
Reliable low-cost energy9.9 Transitional → Transitional5.5% Likely · rank 16Market access opening Major + Clean power threshold Severe×1.1Energy Technologies 8
Research translated into value15.2 Advanced → Advanced4.8% Possible · rank 19Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.2Artificial Intelligence 10
Broad rise in trade and investment14.5 Established → Advanced4.5% Possible · rank 16Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.3
Higher-value manufacturing13.2 Established → Established4.2% Possible · rank 17Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.3Artificial Intelligence 10
Broad rise in human capital15.8 Advanced → Advanced3.3% Possible · rank 20Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.8Artificial Intelligence 10
Sophisticated export strength15.3 Advanced → Advanced3.3% Possible · rank 19Great-power détente Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.6Alliances & Security Cooperation 10
Broad rise in production and innovation15.0 Advanced → Advanced3.3% Possible · rank 18Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.7Energy Technologies 8
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure12.8 Established → Established3.1% Possible · rank 19Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.8Artificial Intelligence 10
Higher-value international business14.6 Established → Advanced3.0% Possible · rank 18Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Extreme×2.0Artificial Intelligence 10
Secure food and water supply13.3 Established → Established1.8% Possible · rank 21Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Extreme×2.0Artificial Intelligence 10
Adaptable skilled workforce16.1 Advanced → Advanced1.7% Possible · rank 22Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.3
Broad rise in financial strength14.6 Established → Advanced1.5% Possible · rank 18Automated discovery step Major + Chronic disease advance Extreme×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 12.8
Deeper long-term finance14.3 Established → Advanced1.1% Possible · rank 18Clean power threshold Extreme + Automated discovery step Major×1.7Energy Technologies 8
Broad rise in information and influence11.8 Transitional → Established0.9% Unlikely · rank 17Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.3
Assured space services5.5 Nascent → Foundational0.8% Unlikely · rank 19Automated discovery step Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Major×2.0Artificial Intelligence 10
Stronger information environment11.3 Transitional → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 24Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.6Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.3
Wider international influence12.3 Established → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 24Great-power détente Extreme + Automated discovery step Severe×2.0Alliances & Security Cooperation 10
Broad rise in national security5.4 Nascent → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 18Great-power détente Severe + Automated discovery step Extreme×2.0Artificial Intelligence 10
More deployable joint force5.9 Nascent → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 18Great-power détente Severe + Automated discovery step Extreme×2.0Artificial Intelligence 10