Russia and Eurasia · AZE

Azerbaijan

Baseline index 6.79Rank 85 of 197FoundationalRussia and EurasiaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Insulated over 10 years: lower vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
20.1
rank 106 of 197 · 3 years: 19.8
Worst case
−11.8%
Cryptographic trust break · tail −11.1%
Opportunity · 10 years
−25.3
rank 185 of 197 · 3 years: −25.5
Best case
−2
Debt service reset · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
28%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.24
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
6of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Hybrid coercion, AI labour shock, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; land border with russia or belarus; no coastline; industry as a share of gdp; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Azerbaijan’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.82−0.80−1.02−0.45▼ 318Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.7 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.69−0.75−1.05−0.47016Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.9 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.91−0.71−1.01−0.44▼ 418Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.67−0.67−0.87−0.38▼ 213Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.1 · Nascent
AI labour shock S08High 0.62−0.67−0.91−0.40▲ 116Artificial Intelligence 1.3 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.59−0.62−0.86−0.38012Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03Medium 0.45−0.45−0.66−0.29▲ 211Maritime Power 3.1 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.35−0.37−0.55−0.24▲ 47Energy Infrastructure 7 · Foundational
Core disaster S07Medium 0.37−0.34−0.52−0.23▲ 210Financial System Depth & Access 6.1 · Foundational
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.39−0.33−0.48−0.21▲ 48Investment Attraction & Projection 5.9 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Cryptographic trust break−0.96−0.57−1.05·−1.28−1.20−1.12−0.48−0.55
Severe pandemic−0.77−0.40−0.33−0.97−0.85−0.91−0.85−0.83−0.83
Hybrid coercion−0.52−1.14−1.14·−1.27−1.31·−0.48−0.48
Legitimacy rupture−0.39−0.43−0.78−0.39−0.91−1.27−1.04−0.39−0.45
AI labour shock−0.73−0.34·−0.91−0.79−0.94−0.79−0.78−0.78
Trade bloc rupture−0.74−0.31−0.28−0.31−0.73−0.71−0.73−0.72−0.99
Regional war spillover−0.25−0.60−0.55−0.23−0.23−0.58−0.54−0.46−0.59
Breadbasket failure−0.20−0.46−0.16−0.44−0.42−0.45−0.48−0.36−0.41
Core disaster−0.02−0.51−0.16−0.41−0.18−0.46−0.49−0.42−0.42
Global funding seizure−0.20−0.22·−0.22−0.20−0.45−0.73−0.52−0.46
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Azerbaijan is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−2.23.96.132126Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 4.7 · Nascent
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed−4.014.618.726155Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−11.317.228.526134Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−17.210.427.623172Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−19.67.026.625190Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−19.74.023.817160Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−20.712.232.836162Trade Policy & Market Access 6.5 · Foundational
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−30.25.936.112154Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Loser−40.43.744.134190Justice System & Fundamental Rights 5.3 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−52.97.560.425182Energy Technologies 2.2 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Azerbaijan, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Strategic awareness failure5.7 Nascent → Inception4.2% Possible · rank 2Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severe×1.9Quantum Technologies 0.8
Breakdown of state function8.3 Foundational → Nascent3.6% Possible · rank 57Hybrid coercion Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severe×1.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7
Broad fall in governance and integrity6.9 Foundational → Nascent2.4% Possible · rank 22Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7
Rule of law failure5.0 Nascent → Inception1.9% Possible · rank 10Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 0.8
Breakdown of information trust6.3 Foundational → Inception1.5% Possible · rank 18Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7
Broad fall in information and influence7.6 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 15Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7
Diplomatic isolation7.5 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 10Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7
Defence readiness failure8.2 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 11Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7
Broad fall in national security6.6 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 7Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.6Quantum Technologies 0.8
Failure of digital lifelines6.9 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 12Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7
Loss of financial stability8.0 Foundational → Nascent0.7% Unlikely · rank 168Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.5Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4.7
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure8.7 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 54Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.6Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7
Collapse in energy security7.2 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 70Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7
Broad fall in financial strength7.8 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 174Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.7Artificial Intelligence 2.7
Health system failure8.8 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 174Trade bloc rupture Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Broad fall in trade and investment6.9 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 135Trade bloc rupture Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Food and water failure8.8 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 127Hybrid coercion Extreme + Core disaster Severeplans fail×3.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7
Rupture in trade and supply8.2 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 159Trade bloc rupture Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Broad fall in human capital8.3 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 155Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Broad fall in production and innovation6.6 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 154Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Loss of industrial capacity7.5 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 164Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Education pipeline failure9.2 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 164Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Broad fall in critical technology1.9 Inception— No route · rank 86Already at the foot of the scale×3.1—
Loss of advanced technology base1.1 Inception— No route · rank 86Already at the foot of the scale×4.0—
Loss of strategic deterrence3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 86No route found · closest 2.5 of 3×4.7—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology1.9 Inception— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.3—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure8.7 Foundational— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.2—
Broad rise in national security6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Broad rise in human capital8.3 Foundational— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.2—
Broad rise in information and influence7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.9—
Broad rise in governance and integrity6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 88No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.7—
Broad rise in financial strength7.8 Foundational— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.0—
Broad rise in production and innovation6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.8—
Broad rise in trade and investment6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 86No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.2—
Assured space services2.8 Inception— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.8—
Frontier AI and compute1.6 Inception— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.8—
Higher-value manufacturing4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.8—
Reliable low-cost energy5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 91No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.6—
Secure food and water supply8.8 Foundational— No route · rank 87No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.8—
More deployable joint force7.3 Foundational— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Adaptable skilled workforce7.5 Foundational— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.6—
Stronger health and biotechnology6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Stronger information environment7.7 Foundational— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.1—
Wider international influence7.5 Foundational— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.8—
Capable digital government9.3 Transitional— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.4—
Trusted public institutions5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.7—
Deeper long-term finance7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.6—
Research translated into value5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.8—
Higher-value international business6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 87No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.9—
Sophisticated export strength6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.2—