Gulf and Middle East · BHR

Bahrain

Baseline index 7.32Rank 76 of 197FoundationalGulf and Middle EastAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Insulated over 10 years: lower vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
20.4
rank 105 of 197 · 3 years: 20.1
Worst case
−13.5%
Regional war spillover · tail −11.6%
Opportunity · 10 years
−8.9
rank 116 of 197 · 3 years: −9.1
Best case
+13
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed
31%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.24
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
3of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; internet users as a share of population; little renewable water per head; public debt relative to gdp; industry as a share of gdp; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; urban share of population; adult obesity rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Bahrain’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 1.00−0.99−1.46−0.64▼ 832Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 3 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.88−0.85−1.09−0.49▼ 424Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.68−0.72−1.05−0.46▼ 222Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.6 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.69−0.69−1.01−0.45▼ 123Artificial Intelligence 2.3 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.62−0.63−0.90−0.40▼ 216Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.81−0.63−1.02−0.44▼ 119Economic Output & Productivity 5.5 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06High 0.62−0.62−0.98−0.43▼ 223Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 4.8 · Nascent
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.52−0.52−0.67−0.29▲ 117Political Institutions & Civic Participation 2.8 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.60−0.48−0.67−0.29▼ 318Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.9 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.43−0.36−0.61−0.27▲ 119Energy Infrastructure 5.9 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.56−1.32−1.22−0.51−0.51−1.27−1.19−1.02−1.31
Cryptographic trust break−1.01−0.61−1.12·−1.36−1.27−1.19−0.51−0.58
Severe pandemic−0.75−0.38−0.31−0.93−0.82−0.87−0.82−0.80−0.80
AI labour shock−0.74−0.35·−0.93−0.81−0.96−0.81−0.80−0.80
Trade bloc rupture−0.76−0.32−0.29−0.32−0.75−0.73−0.75−0.74−1.02
Global funding seizure−0.38−0.42·−0.42−0.38−0.85−1.39−0.97−0.87
Breadbasket failure−0.32−0.77−0.27−0.72−0.69−0.74−0.79−0.59−0.67
Legitimacy rupture−0.30−0.33−0.60−0.30−0.71−0.98−0.81−0.30−0.35
Hybrid coercion−0.36−0.79−0.79·−0.87−0.90·−0.33−0.33
Core disaster−0.02−0.55−0.18−0.43−0.19−0.49−0.52−0.45−0.45
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Bahrain is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+13.418.45.02777Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+10.521.911.42948Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+8.611.53.02748Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed+0.210.210.02046Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−4.93.48.235160Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 4.7 · Nascent
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−9.022.331.340107Energy Infrastructure 6.6 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−11.98.320.227154Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Loser−12.918.531.435168Justice System & Fundamental Rights 5.5 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−16.18.124.21279Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−44.48.452.825173Energy Technologies 1.8 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Bahrain, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function9.1 Transitional → Nascent3.6% Possible · rank 58Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.0Maritime Power 5.8
Loss of financial stability9.9 Transitional → Foundational3.6% Possible · rank 22Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Majorplans fail×2.0Financial Stability & Crisis Management 9.3
Broad fall in financial strength10.1 Transitional → Foundational2.7% Possible · rank 12Global funding seizure Severe + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.2Financial Stability & Crisis Management 9.3
Broad fall in governance and integrity7.5 Foundational → Nascent2.0% Possible · rank 49Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.4Maritime Power 5.8
Broad fall in trade and investment8.7 Foundational → Nascent1.5% Possible · rank 13Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 5.8
Rupture in trade and supply9.0 Foundational → Nascent1.5% Possible · rank 41Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×1.7Maritime Power 5.8
Collapse in energy security5.8 Nascent → Inception1.3% Possible · rank 17Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×1.8Maritime Power 5.8
Defence readiness failure6.9 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Unlikely · rank 9Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.4Maritime Power 5.8
Strategic awareness failure4.4 Nascent → Inception1.0% Unlikely · rank 46Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.8Quantum Technologies 0.8
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure9.0 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 8Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 5.8
Rule of law failure5.4 Nascent → Inception0.9% Unlikely · rank 63Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.8
Breakdown of information trust5.1 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 71Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.8
Broad fall in production and innovation7.8 Foundational → Nascent0.7% Unlikely · rank 18Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.0Financial Stability & Crisis Management 9.3
Loss of industrial capacity8.1 Foundational → Nascent0.7% Unlikely · rank 24Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.9Financial Stability & Crisis Management 9.3
Broad fall in information and influence5.9 Nascent → Inception0.6% Unlikely · rank 61Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.8
Broad fall in national security5.2 Nascent → Inception0.6% Unlikely · rank 20Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Maritime Power 5.8
Diplomatic isolation6.7 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 58Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.8
Food and water failure8.9 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 63Regional war spillover Severe + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×2.5Agriculture & Food Infrastructure 6.5
Health system failure11.2 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 102Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Failure of digital lifelines9.0 Transitional → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 62Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.8
Broad fall in human capital10.1 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 85Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Education pipeline failure11.0 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 63Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Broad fall in critical technology1.6 Inception— No route · rank 78Already at the foot of the scale×3.0—
Loss of advanced technology base0.9 Inception— No route · rank 78Already at the foot of the scale×3.9—
Loss of strategic deterrence2.4 Inception— No route · rank 78Already at the foot of the scale×3.0—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology8.1 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 79Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Broad rise in critical technology1.6 Inception— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.2—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure9.0 Foundational— No route · rank 77No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.7—
Broad rise in national security5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×4.9—
Broad rise in human capital10.1 Transitional— No route · rank 77No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
Broad rise in information and influence5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.0—
Broad rise in governance and integrity7.5 Foundational— No route · rank 82No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.6—
Broad rise in financial strength10.1 Transitional— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×3.9—
Broad rise in production and innovation7.8 Foundational— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.5—
Broad rise in trade and investment8.7 Foundational— No route · rank 79No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.9—
Assured space services1.8 Inception— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.2—
Frontier AI and compute2.1 Inception— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Higher-value manufacturing4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Reliable low-cost energy4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 87No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.6—
Secure food and water supply8.9 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.3—
More deployable joint force6.5 Foundational— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.4—
Adaptable skilled workforce9.0 Transitional— No route · rank 77No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.6—
Stronger information environment5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.1—
Wider international influence6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.2—
Capable digital government11.6 Transitional— No route · rank 91No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.4—
Trusted public institutions5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 89No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.6—
Deeper long-term finance10.9 Transitional— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.2—
Research translated into value7.1 Foundational— No route · rank 77No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.5—
Higher-value international business8.9 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×2.7—
Sophisticated export strength8.1 Foundational— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.4—