South Asia · BTN

Bhutan

Baseline index 3.92Rank 145 of 197NascentSouth AsiaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile and exposed. Highly vulnerable importers of fuel, finance and food. One of 35 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
36.2
rank 48 of 197 · 3 years: 35.9
Worst case
−25.0%
Regional war spillover · tail −21.6%
Opportunity · 10 years
−11.1
rank 138 of 197 · 3 years: −10.8
Best case
+11
Clean power threshold · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed
18%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.29
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Advanced Materials & Manufacturing
weakest point in 1 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; no coastline; public debt relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Bhutan’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.90−0.98−1.15−0.53▼ 721Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.77−0.86−1.05−0.48▼ 816Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.62−0.70−0.86−0.39014Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.72−0.69−0.87−0.39▼ 314Investment Attraction & Projection 1 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.68−0.65−0.73−0.34▼ 212Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.72−0.64−0.86−0.38▲ 214Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0.7 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.44−0.49−0.58−0.26▲ 412Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.51−0.45−0.51−0.23▼ 59Intelligence & Assessment 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.34−0.41−0.52−0.23▲ 710Trade Facilitation & Logistics 2.7 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.41−0.41−0.57−0.25▲ 811Transport Infrastructure 2.5 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.27−1.43−0.67−0.57−0.57−1.41−1.32−1.13−1.45
AI labour shock−0.35−0.47·−1.25−1.10−1.29−1.10−1.07−1.07
Severe pandemic−0.30−0.41−0.22−0.99−0.87−0.93−0.87−0.85−0.85
Global funding seizure−0.24−0.47·−0.47−0.42−0.95−1.56−1.09−0.97
Cryptographic trust break−0.34−0.54−0.63·−1.20−1.12−1.05−0.45−0.51
Legitimacy rupture−0.23−0.44−0.56−0.40−0.93−1.29−1.06−0.40−0.45
Trade bloc rupture−0.26−0.28−0.17−0.28−0.65−0.63−0.65−0.64−0.88
Hybrid coercion−0.25−0.80−0.53·−0.89−0.92·−0.33−0.33
Breadbasket failure−0.18−0.53−0.12−0.50−0.48−0.51−0.54−0.41−0.47
Core disaster−0.02−0.63−0.14−0.50−0.23−0.57−0.60−0.52−0.52
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Bhutan is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+10.911.50.61278Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+6.58.41.91782Intelligence & Assessment 1.3 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+2.710.27.53164Energy Infrastructure 5 · Nascent
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+1.57.96.414137Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+1.45.23.81295Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−11.111.522.518140Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−14.97.722.616155Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−20.02.722.79161Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−22.411.934.218166Investment Attraction & Projection 2.7 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−37.32.940.25180Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Bhutan, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function8.2 Foundational → Nascent3.4% Possible · rank 65Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severe×1.8Maritime Power 0
Loss of financial stability5.9 Nascent → Inception2.9% Possible · rank 39Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severe×1.8Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Broad fall in governance and integrity7.7 Foundational → Nascent2.0% Possible · rank 44Regional war spillover Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Major×2.1Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in financial strength5.5 Nascent → Inception1.9% Possible · rank 30Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×1.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Rule of law failure7.9 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Possible · rank 40Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2.3
Rupture in trade and supply3.4 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 106Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extreme×1.5Maritime Power 0
Loss of industrial capacity4.0 Nascent → Inception0.7% Unlikely · rank 20Global funding seizure Major + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in production and innovation4.0 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 65Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 0
Health system failure7.5 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 149Global funding seizure Severe + Severe pandemic Extreme×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2
Broad fall in trade and investment3.5 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 120Regional war spillover Major + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.1Artificial Intelligence 1
Breakdown of information trust4.3 Nascent → Inception0.2% Unlikely · rank 152Hybrid coercion Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2.3
Broad fall in human capital6.0 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 87Global funding seizure Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.4Artificial Intelligence 1
Food and water failure5.3 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 162Regional war spillover Extreme + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 0
Diplomatic isolation3.3 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 144Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.5Quantum Technologies 0.3
Education pipeline failure6.7 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 145AI labour shock Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×2.6Artificial Intelligence 1
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure4.2 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 155Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 0
Failure of digital lifelines4.2 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 108Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.2Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in critical technology0.4 Inception— No route · rank 145Already at the foot of the scale×8.7—
Broad fall in national security1.0 Inception— No route · rank 147Already at the foot of the scale×4.5—
Broad fall in information and influence3.0 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 2.9 of 3×2.5—
Loss of advanced technology base0.2 Inception— No route · rank 145Already at the foot of the scale×17—
Collapse in energy security2.5 Inception— No route · rank 150Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Defence readiness failure1.2 Inception— No route · rank 154Already at the foot of the scale×5.0—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.4 Inception— No route · rank 145Already at the foot of the scale×8.0—
Strategic awareness failure1.0 Inception— No route · rank 147Already at the foot of the scale×3.1—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.4 Inception— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.9—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.0—
Broad rise in national security1.0 Inception— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×11—
Broad rise in human capital6.0 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Broad rise in information and influence3.0 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.7—
Broad rise in governance and integrity7.7 Foundational— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.3—
Broad rise in financial strength5.5 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.3—
Broad rise in production and innovation4.0 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.8—
Broad rise in trade and investment3.5 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.3—
Assured space services0.7 Inception— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Frontier AI and compute0.5 Inception— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×8.7—
Higher-value manufacturing1.7 Inception— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.7—
Reliable low-cost energy2.7 Inception— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.3—
Secure food and water supply5.3 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×8.4—
More deployable joint force1.2 Inception— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×12—
Adaptable skilled workforce4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.7—
Stronger health and biotechnology5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Stronger information environment2.7 Inception— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.7—
Wider international influence3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.1—
Capable digital government6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.3—
Trusted public institutions7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.3—
Deeper long-term finance5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.0—
Research translated into value3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.5—
Higher-value international business3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.0—
Sophisticated export strength3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 145No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.3—