Europe · BIH

Bosnia & Herzegovina

Baseline index 5.79Rank 103 of 197NascentEuropeAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
26.7
rank 80 of 197 · 3 years: 26.3
Worst case
−18.2%
Regional war spillover · tail −16.0%
Opportunity · 10 years
−10.3
rank 130 of 197 · 3 years: −10.2
Best case
+17
Clean power threshold · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed
23%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.30
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Hybrid coercion. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; youth unemployment rate; remittances relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population; share of population aged 65 and over.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Bosnia & Herzegovina’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.94−1.05−1.32−0.60▼ 1021Maritime Power 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.78−0.87−1.13−0.50▼ 615Artificial Intelligence 0.2 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.75−0.86−1.13−0.51▼ 416Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.3 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.84−0.85−1.02−0.46▼ 514Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.1 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.56−0.64−0.81−0.36▼ 38Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.69−0.60−0.75−0.34▼ 711Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.59−0.54−0.73−0.32▼ 16Investment Attraction & Projection 4 · Nascent
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.56−0.51−0.72−0.31▲ 55Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.1 · Nascent
Core disaster S07Medium 0.46−0.44−0.64−0.28▲ 311Trade Facilitation & Logistics 5 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.28−0.33−0.44−0.19▲ 32Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 4.4 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.55−1.44−1.17−0.55−0.55−1.39−1.29−1.11−1.43
AI labour shock−0.82−0.45·−1.19−1.05−1.23−1.05−1.02−1.02
Severe pandemic−0.79−0.47−0.38−1.14−1.00−1.07−1.00−0.98−0.98
Cryptographic trust break−0.91−0.62−1.13·−1.38−1.29−1.21−0.52−0.59
Trade bloc rupture−0.71−0.33−0.30−0.33−0.77−0.75−0.77−0.76−1.04
Hybrid coercion−0.43−0.98−0.94·−1.09−1.13·−0.41−0.41
Global funding seizure−0.32−0.36·−0.36−0.33−0.73−1.19−0.84−0.74
Legitimacy rupture−0.29−0.33−0.59−0.30−0.69−0.97−0.79−0.30−0.34
Core disaster−0.02−0.67−0.21−0.53−0.24−0.60−0.64−0.54−0.54
Breadbasket failure−0.17−0.40−0.14−0.38−0.36−0.39−0.41−0.31−0.36
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Bosnia & Herzegovina is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+17.017.50.52052Energy Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+12.515.63.12282Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+12.113.91.82958Intelligence & Assessment 4.7 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−1.08.08.92482Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Loser−10.23.613.738192Financial System Depth & Access 6.8 · Foundational
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−12.24.917.122157Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−14.66.721.215127Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−15.312.828.230143Investment Attraction & Projection 5.3 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−20.48.829.21198Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−30.114.744.923192Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Bosnia & Herzegovina, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function8.5 Foundational → Nascent4.1% Possible · rank 34Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severe×1.8Maritime Power 1.3
Rupture in trade and supply6.3 Foundational → Nascent3.1% Possible · rank 15Regional war spillover Extreme×1.6Maritime Power 1.3
Broad fall in governance and integrity8.1 Foundational → Nascent2.0% Possible · rank 43Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 1.3
Collapse in energy security4.3 Nascent → Inception1.8% Possible · rank 8Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×1.6Maritime Power 1.3
Loss of financial stability7.3 Foundational → Nascent1.7% Possible · rank 102Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 1.3
Broad fall in financial strength6.9 Foundational → Nascent1.7% Possible · rank 46Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 1.3
Rule of law failure8.2 Foundational → Nascent1.3% Possible · rank 29Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.3
Breakdown of information trust6.0 Foundational → Inception1.2% Possible · rank 29Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in information and influence5.1 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 19Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.3
Diplomatic isolation4.7 Nascent → Inception1.0% Unlikely · rank 23Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.3
Strategic awareness failure3.0 Nascent → Inception0.9% Unlikely · rank 51Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×1.8Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in trade and investment6.0 Foundational → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 38Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 1.3
Health system failure9.5 Transitional → Foundational0.8% Unlikely · rank 78Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure6.6 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 23Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 1.3
Broad fall in production and innovation6.4 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 38Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 1.3
Loss of industrial capacity6.8 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 46Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 1.3
Failure of digital lifelines6.0 Foundational → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 56Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.3
Food and water failure7.5 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 114Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.7Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 3.7
Broad fall in human capital8.4 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 71Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Education pipeline failure9.2 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 99Regional war spillover Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.7Artificial Intelligence 2
Broad fall in critical technology1.4 Inception— No route · rank 104Already at the foot of the scale×3.3—
Broad fall in national security3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 2.7 of 3×2.6—
Loss of advanced technology base0.9 Inception— No route · rank 104Already at the foot of the scale×5.0—
Defence readiness failure3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 131No route found · closest 2.9 of 3×2.6—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.9 Inception— No route · rank 104Already at the foot of the scale×3.4—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology1.4 Inception— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.2—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Broad rise in national security3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.5—
Broad rise in human capital8.4 Foundational— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.8—
Broad rise in information and influence5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.4—
Broad rise in governance and integrity8.1 Foundational— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Broad rise in financial strength6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.9—
Broad rise in production and innovation6.4 Foundational— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.4—
Broad rise in trade and investment6.0 Foundational— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.0—
Assured space services1.2 Inception— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.3—
Frontier AI and compute1.3 Inception— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
Higher-value manufacturing4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
Reliable low-cost energy4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 105No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×2.9—
Secure food and water supply7.5 Foundational— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
More deployable joint force3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.2—
Adaptable skilled workforce7.4 Foundational— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.3—
Stronger health and biotechnology7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.9—
Stronger information environment5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.8—
Wider international influence4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.3—
Capable digital government8.3 Foundational— No route · rank 106No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.8—
Trusted public institutions7.8 Foundational— No route · rank 106No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Deeper long-term finance6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.6—
Research translated into value5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.9—
Higher-value international business5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.7—
Sophisticated export strength6.5 Foundational— No route · rank 103No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—