Latin America and Caribbean · BRA

Brazil

Baseline index 11.69Rank 30 of 197TransitionalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Low vulnerability, and gains from open markets and digital public services. One of 39 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
6.5
rank 183 of 197 · 3 years: 6.3
Worst case
−4.9%
AI labour shock · tail −4.8%
Opportunity · 10 years
+4.6
rank 57 of 197 · 3 years: +4.7
Best case
+33
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed
45%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.07
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Labour & Employment
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI labour shock, Global funding seizure, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: urban share of population; internet users as a share of population; public debt relative to gdp; oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Brazil’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Severe pandemic S10High 0.70−0.58−1.08−0.47019Labour & Employment 9.9 · Transitional
AI labour shock S08High 0.67−0.57−1.00−0.44015Artificial Intelligence 8.2 · Foundational
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.68−0.55−0.87−0.38019Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 8 · Foundational
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.76−0.53−0.98−0.43▼ 318Internal Security & Order 9.4 · Transitional
Core disaster S07High 0.65−0.47−0.91−0.40▼ 116Trade Facilitation & Logistics 11 · Transitional
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.58−0.38−0.73−0.3209Labour & Employment 10.1 · Transitional
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.42−0.33−0.62−0.27014Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4.7 · Nascent
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.43−0.27−0.48−0.21012Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 8.6 · Foundational
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.22−0.19−0.35−0.1509Internal Security & Order 10.3 · Transitional
Regional war spillover S03Low 0.22−0.16−0.32−0.14▲ 210Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 6 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Severe pandemic−0.61−0.31−0.25−0.74−0.65−0.70−0.65−0.64−0.64
AI labour shock−0.63−0.29·−0.76−0.67−0.79−0.67−0.65−0.65
Cryptographic trust break−0.72−0.39−0.72·−0.87−0.81−0.76−0.33−0.37
Legitimacy rupture−0.31−0.34−0.62−0.31−0.72−1.00−0.82−0.31−0.35
Core disaster−0.03−0.70−0.23−0.56−0.25−0.63−0.67−0.57−0.57
Global funding seizure−0.23−0.25·−0.25−0.23−0.51−0.84−0.59−0.52
Trade bloc rupture−0.44−0.17−0.15−0.17−0.39−0.38−0.39−0.39−0.53
Hybrid coercion−0.20−0.44−0.44·−0.49−0.51·−0.18−0.18
Breadbasket failure−0.10−0.23−0.08−0.22−0.21−0.22−0.24−0.18−0.20
Regional war spillover−0.09−0.22−0.20−0.08−0.08−0.21−0.20−0.17−0.22
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Brazil is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+33.236.63.45738Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7 · Transitional
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+21.041.720.85828Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7 · Transitional
Public service leap S18 ↗Gainer+18.630.311.7549Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 9.4 · Transitional
Market access opening S12 ↗Gainer+10.923.712.95834Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7 · Transitional
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+9.513.03.56016Foundational Education 11.3 · Transitional
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Mixed+6.220.814.53939Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.3 · Nascent
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed+1.916.014.14242Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.3 · Nascent
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−5.117.322.459126Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7 · Transitional
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−8.312.620.958156Internal Security & Order 10.7 · Transitional
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−16.014.330.357161Energy Technologies 9.8 · Transitional

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Brazil, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function12.5 Established → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 183Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.3
Loss of financial stability13.7 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 171Global funding seizure Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.3Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 10.8
Broad fall in financial strength13.1 Established → Transitional0.6% Unlikely · rank 148Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×3.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 10.8
Broad fall in governance and integrity12.1 Established → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 174Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×3.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.3
Breakdown of information trust12.5 Established → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 122Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.3
Rule of law failure12.1 Established → Foundational0.2% Unlikely · rank 173Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.3
Broad fall in information and influence11.9 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 110Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.5Artificial Intelligence 9.3
Loss of industrial capacity12.8 Established → Transitional0.2% Remote · rank 125Global funding seizure Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×4.7Artificial Intelligence 9.3
Strategic awareness failure9.7 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 85Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 6.3
Health system failure12.2 Established → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 185Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.3
Diplomatic isolation12.1 Established → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 136Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.5Quantum Technologies 6.3
Broad fall in production and innovation11.9 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 136Global funding seizure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×4.6Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.3
Failure of digital lifelines12.9 Established → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 86Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.5Quantum Technologies 6.3
Food and water failure13.2 Established → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 178Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×4.0National Resilience & Crisis Management 12.2
Rupture in trade and supply12.1 Established → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 176Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×4.0National Resilience & Crisis Management 12.2
Defence readiness failure12.2 Established → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 88Hybrid coercion Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×3.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.3
Broad fall in trade and investment12.2 Established → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 166Global funding seizure Extreme + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×4.6Artificial Intelligence 9.3
Broad fall in critical technology9.0 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 55Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×4.2Quantum Technologies 6.3
Broad fall in human capital11.9 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 149AI labour shock Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.3
Loss of advanced technology base7.8 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 49Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×4.6Quantum Technologies 6.3
Broad fall in national security9.4 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 78Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×4.2Quantum Technologies 6.3
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure13.8 Established → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 165Hybrid coercion Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×4.3National Resilience & Crisis Management 12.2
Collapse in energy security13.3 Established → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 125Hybrid coercion Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×5.1National Resilience & Crisis Management 12.2
Education pipeline failure12.4 Established → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 178AI labour shock Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×4.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.3
Loss of strategic deterrence4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 48No route found · closest 2.3 of 3×6.9—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology12.3 Established → Established6.6% Likely · rank 30Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.4Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Capable digital government12.4 Established → Established3.3% Possible · rank 32Public service leap Severe + Chronic disease advance Severe×1.6Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 9.4
Trusted public institutions11.7 Transitional → Established2.6% Possible · rank 35Public service leap Severe + Chronic disease advance Severe×1.6Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 9.4
Broad rise in governance and integrity12.1 Established → Established2.1% Possible · rank 34Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.9Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Frontier AI and compute7.3 Foundational → Foundational0.7% Unlikely · rank 40Automated discovery step Severe + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.4Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Broad rise in critical technology9.0 Foundational → Transitional0.6% Unlikely · rank 39Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.2Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Broad rise in human capital11.9 Transitional → Established0.6% Unlikely · rank 36Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.2Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Broad rise in financial strength13.1 Established → Established0.3% Unlikely · rank 33Public service leap Severe + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.1Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Adaptable skilled workforce11.2 Transitional → Established0.2% Remote · rank 38Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.7Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure13.8 Established → Advanced0.1% Remote · rank 45Public service leap Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.5Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Broad rise in trade and investment12.2 Established → Established0.1% Remote · rank 45Market access opening Extreme + Great-power détente Extreme×2.4Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Secure food and water supply13.2 Established → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 47Water-efficient food leap Extreme + Public service leap Extreme×2.7Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Sophisticated export strength12.5 Established → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 46Market access opening Extreme + Great-power détente Extreme×2.7Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.3
Broad rise in information and influence11.9 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 36Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.3Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Higher-value manufacturing11.0 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 41Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.7Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Reliable low-cost energy11.9 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 59Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.7Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Stronger information environment11.6 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 37Public service leap Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.0Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Deeper long-term finance13.5 Established → Advancedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 36Public service leap Extreme + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.6Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 9.4
Research translated into value11.4 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 50Automated discovery step Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.7Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Wider international influence12.1 Established → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 46Public service leap Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.7Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Higher-value international business11.9 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 62Market access opening Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.5Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7
Broad rise in national security9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 34No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Broad rise in production and innovation11.9 Transitional— No route · rank 54No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.7—
Assured space services9.5 Transitional— No route · rank 37No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.1—
More deployable joint force12.0 Established— No route · rank 32No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—