Africa · CPV

Cabo Verde

Baseline index 4.72Rank 124 of 197NascentAfricaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Stretched developers. Exposed to food and funding shocks; debt relief and better yields are their upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
29.4
rank 75 of 197 · 3 years: 29.1
Worst case
−18.4%
Regional war spillover · tail −17.0%
Opportunity · 10 years
−5.2
rank 94 of 197 · 3 years: −5.1
Best case
+6
Debt service reset · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
22%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.28
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Advanced Materials & Manufacturing
weakest point in 1 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; public debt relative to gdp; little renewable water per head; remittances relative to gdp; youth unemployment rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Cabo Verde’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.79−0.87−1.03−0.47▼ 219Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.71−0.79−1.01−0.45▼ 121Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.76−0.74−1.05−0.46▼ 621Industrial & Sectoral Base 1.9 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.68−0.73−0.93−0.41▼ 118Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.78−0.71−0.93−0.41▼ 219Economic Output & Productivity 2.2 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.67−0.65−0.74−0.34▲ 115Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.77−0.63−0.92−0.41018Force Generation & Mobilisation 1.4 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.52−0.61−0.79−0.35▼ 316Energy Infrastructure 2.8 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.38−0.43−0.51−0.23▲ 311Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.39−0.34−0.40−0.18▲ 15Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 0.7 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.24−1.18−0.79−0.49−0.49−1.23−1.15−0.98−1.26
Severe pandemic−0.31−0.46−0.32−1.12−0.98−1.05−0.98−0.96−0.96
Core disaster−0.04−1.13−0.31−0.90−0.40−1.01−1.07−0.92−0.92
AI labour shock−0.32−0.40·−1.06−0.93−1.10−0.93−0.91−0.91
Global funding seizure−0.20−0.49·−0.49−0.44−0.99−1.62−1.14−1.01
Cryptographic trust break−0.35−0.52−0.79·−1.16−1.09−1.02−0.44−0.50
Legitimacy rupture−0.18−0.43−0.65−0.39−0.91−1.27−1.04−0.39−0.45
Breadbasket failure−0.17−0.78−0.23−0.73−0.70−0.75−0.80−0.60−0.68
Trade bloc rupture−0.21−0.24−0.19−0.24−0.56−0.54−0.56−0.55−0.76
Hybrid coercion−0.15−0.59−0.52·−0.66−0.68·−0.25−0.25
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Cabo Verde is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+6.113.27.23130Energy Infrastructure 4 · Nascent
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+6.19.83.71568Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed−0.811.212.116147Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−1.517.318.82573Energy Infrastructure 4 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−3.216.319.52191Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−3.99.313.221146Intelligence & Assessment 2 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed−4.010.414.414143Energy Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−6.93.810.71177Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−12.57.319.718141Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−17.62.620.3687Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Cabo Verde, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability6.7 Foundational → Nascent4.2% Possible · rank 14Global funding seizure Severe + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×1.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4
Breakdown of state function9.6 Transitional → Foundational3.7% Possible · rank 54Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.3
Broad fall in financial strength6.2 Foundational → Nascent2.1% Possible · rank 26Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Majorplans fail×1.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4
Broad fall in governance and integrity9.2 Transitional → Nascent1.7% Possible · rank 71Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.3
Rupture in trade and supply5.1 Nascent → Inception1.5% Possible · rank 42Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×1.7Resource Infrastructure 1
Health system failure8.2 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Possible · rank 40Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4
Rule of law failure9.8 Transitional → Foundational0.9% Unlikely · rank 64Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.3
Food and water failure6.2 Foundational → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 47Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.5Financial System Depth & Access 5.8
Broad fall in trade and investment4.8 Nascent → Inception0.7% Unlikely · rank 51Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×2.4Resource Infrastructure 1
Loss of industrial capacity4.0 Nascent → Inception0.7% Unlikely · rank 27Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.5Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4
Broad fall in production and innovation4.4 Nascent → Inception0.5% Unlikely · rank 39Global funding seizure Extreme + Regional war spillover Majorplans fail×2.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4
Breakdown of information trust5.6 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 129Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.3
Broad fall in human capital7.0 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 62Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4
Education pipeline failure8.2 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 47Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure4.7 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 119Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.5Financial System Depth & Access 5.8
Broad fall in information and influence4.7 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 138Legitimacy rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.6Quantum Technologies 0.3
Diplomatic isolation3.8 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 139Legitimacy rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.6Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in critical technology0.4 Inception— No route · rank 125Already at the foot of the scale×8.5—
Broad fall in national security1.2 Inception— No route · rank 131Already at the foot of the scale×3.8—
Loss of advanced technology base0.1 Inception— No route · rank 125Already at the foot of the scale×48—
Collapse in energy security1.9 Inception— No route · rank 138Already at the foot of the scale×2.4—
Failure of digital lifelines4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 136No route found · closest 2.8 of 3×3.1—
Defence readiness failure1.6 Inception— No route · rank 143Already at the foot of the scale×3.0—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.3 Inception— No route · rank 125Already at the foot of the scale×9.2—
Strategic awareness failure1.2 Inception— No route · rank 130Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.4 Inception— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.6—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.8—
Broad rise in national security1.2 Inception— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.8—
Broad rise in human capital7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.2—
Broad rise in information and influence4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.1—
Broad rise in governance and integrity9.2 Transitional— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—
Broad rise in financial strength6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
Broad rise in production and innovation4.4 Nascent— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.8—
Broad rise in trade and investment4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.7—
Assured space services0.5 Inception— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.2—
Frontier AI and compute0.5 Inception— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.1—
Higher-value manufacturing1.6 Inception— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.0—
Reliable low-cost energy2.4 Inception— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Secure food and water supply6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
More deployable joint force1.6 Inception— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Adaptable skilled workforce5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Stronger health and biotechnology5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Stronger information environment5.5 Nascent— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.1—
Wider international influence3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.1—
Capable digital government7.7 Foundational— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.1—
Trusted public institutions8.8 Foundational— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.1—
Deeper long-term finance5.5 Nascent— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.9—
Research translated into value3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.8—
Higher-value international business5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.5—
Sophisticated export strength4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 124No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.3—