Africa · TCD

Chad

Baseline index 2.26Rank 184 of 197InceptionAfricaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fuel-dependent. Budgets built on oil, gas and commodities: two of the upside scenarios are their downside. One of 15 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
44.2
rank 31 of 197 · 3 years: 44.0
Worst case
−35.8%
Legitimacy rupture · tail −31.6%
Opportunity · 10 years
−29.2
rank 191 of 197 · 3 years: −29.5
Best case
−0
Water-efficient food leap · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
10%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.23
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Breadbasket failure, Global funding seizure, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; land borders with states in conflict or collapse; no coastline; refugees hosted per head of population; share of population aged under 15; low life expectancy at birth; low real gdp per head; consumer price inflation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Chad’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.76−0.81−0.90−0.40▼ 219Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.52−0.69−0.77−0.34▲ 219Energy Infrastructure 0.4 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.62−0.65−0.73−0.32▼ 115Economic Output & Productivity 0.4 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.42−0.52−0.59−0.26016Energy Infrastructure 0.6 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.41−0.52−0.57−0.25▲ 314Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.41−0.49−0.53−0.24▼ 112Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08Low 0.35−0.42−0.46−0.21▲ 312Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09Medium 0.36−0.38−0.40−0.18▲ 314Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03Low 0.24−0.29−0.33−0.15▲ 78Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Low 0.20−0.18−0.20−0.09▲ 38Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Legitimacy rupture−0.09−0.56−0.88−0.51−1.18−1.65−1.35−0.51−0.58
Breadbasket failure−0.09−0.91−0.28−0.85−0.81−0.87−0.93−0.70−0.80
Global funding seizure−0.09−0.45·−0.45−0.41−0.92−1.50−1.05−0.93
Core disaster−0.02−0.78−0.22−0.62−0.28−0.70−0.75−0.64−0.64
Severe pandemic−0.09−0.31−0.22−0.75−0.65−0.70−0.65−0.64−0.64
Trade bloc rupture−0.09−0.28−0.23−0.28−0.66−0.64−0.66−0.65−0.89
AI labour shock−0.09−0.24·−0.63−0.55−0.65−0.55−0.54−0.54
Cryptographic trust break−0.09−0.31−0.52·−0.70−0.65−0.61−0.26−0.30
Regional war spillover−0.07−0.42−0.32−0.16−0.16−0.40−0.38−0.32−0.41
Hybrid coercion−0.06−0.32−0.27·−0.36−0.37·−0.13−0.13
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Chad is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−0.34.04.36106Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−1.17.48.512117Energy Infrastructure 1.8 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed−2.61.84.4792Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Loser−14.02.516.57192Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−17.11.919.06147Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−23.76.430.17188Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−36.86.743.510192Energy Infrastructure 1.8 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−42.00.642.72189Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Loser−44.16.250.312193Energy Infrastructure 1.8 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−74.32.476.76196Energy Technologies 0.2 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Chad, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability3.4 Nascent → Inception1.8% Possible · rank 96Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severe×1.8Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 2
Breakdown of state function3.3 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 185Global funding seizure Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×1.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Broad fall in financial strength3.1 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 175Global funding seizure Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Majorplans fail×2.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 2
Broad fall in governance and integrity3.0 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 185Global funding seizure Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×1.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2
Health system failure3.0 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 192Global funding seizure Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2
Broad fall in critical technology0.1 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×32—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure2.7 Inception— No route · rank 185Already at the foot of the scale×3.3—
Broad fall in national security2.3 Inception— No route · rank 185Already at the foot of the scale×3.4—
Broad fall in human capital2.3 Inception— No route · rank 188Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Broad fall in information and influence2.8 Inception— No route · rank 185Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Broad fall in production and innovation2.0 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×2.9—
Broad fall in trade and investment2.2 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×3.2—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale——
Collapse in energy security2.1 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×3.9—
Failure of digital lifelines2.2 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×5.7—
Food and water failure3.0 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Defence readiness failure3.5 Nascent— No route · rank 187No route found · closest 2.4 of 3×3.0—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.6 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×5.4—
Strategic awareness failure1.3 Inception— No route · rank 185Already at the foot of the scale×4.4—
Education pipeline failure2.6 Inception— No route · rank 191Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Breakdown of information trust2.3 Inception— No route · rank 185Already at the foot of the scale×1.8—
Diplomatic isolation3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 185No route found · closest 2.4 of 3×3.0—
Rule of law failure2.9 Inception— No route · rank 188Already at the foot of the scale×1.8—
Loss of industrial capacity2.1 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×2.7—
Rupture in trade and supply2.4 Inception— No route · rank 184Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.1 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure2.7 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Broad rise in national security2.3 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×15—
Broad rise in human capital2.3 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Broad rise in information and influence2.8 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×12—
Broad rise in governance and integrity3.0 Nascent— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.6—
Broad rise in financial strength3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Broad rise in production and innovation2.0 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Broad rise in trade and investment2.2 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×9.5—
Assured space services0.5 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×21—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×16—
Higher-value manufacturing1.0 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×18—
Reliable low-cost energy1.0 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×11—
Secure food and water supply3.0 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×13—
More deployable joint force2.9 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×16—
Adaptable skilled workforce1.9 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Stronger health and biotechnology2.1 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Stronger information environment2.3 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×16—
Wider international influence3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.7—
Capable digital government2.5 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.8—
Trusted public institutions2.8 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.8—
Deeper long-term finance2.7 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Research translated into value1.3 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Higher-value international business1.9 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.0—
Sophisticated export strength2.4 Inception— No route · rank 184No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×11—