Latin America and Caribbean · COL

Colombia

Baseline index 9.11Rank 56 of 197TransitionalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Low vulnerability, and gains from open markets and digital public services. One of 39 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Insulated over 10 years: lower vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
9.5
rank 166 of 197 · 3 years: 9.3
Worst case
−7.3%
Severe pandemic · tail −7.1%
Opportunity · 10 years
−6.8
rank 101 of 197 · 3 years: −6.8
Best case
+21
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed
37%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.12
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
8of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI labour shock, Global funding seizure, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; urban share of population; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Colombia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Severe pandemic S10High 0.69−0.67−1.07−0.47▼ 120Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.9 · Nascent
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.80−0.63−1.03−0.45▼ 219Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.5 · Foundational
Core disaster S07High 0.79−0.63−1.10−0.48▼ 321Energy Infrastructure 8.3 · Foundational
AI labour shock S08High 0.64−0.62−0.96−0.42017Artificial Intelligence 4.1 · Nascent
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.65−0.61−0.83−0.36018Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.8 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.55−0.41−0.69−0.30015Labour & Employment 8.5 · Foundational
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.40−0.38−0.59−0.26017Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.41−0.30−0.46−0.20014Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.22−0.21−0.34−0.15▲ 213Energy Infrastructure 9.2 · Transitional
Regional war spillover S03Low 0.22−0.19−0.33−0.14▲ 514Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 3.9 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Severe pandemic−0.71−0.36−0.29−0.86−0.75−0.81−0.75−0.74−0.74
Legitimacy rupture−0.36−0.40−0.73−0.36−0.85−1.18−0.97−0.36−0.42
Core disaster−0.03−0.95−0.31−0.76−0.34−0.85−0.91−0.78−0.78
AI labour shock−0.68−0.31·−0.83−0.72−0.85−0.72−0.71−0.71
Cryptographic trust break−0.79−0.43−0.79·−0.96−0.90−0.84−0.36−0.41
Global funding seizure−0.25−0.27·−0.28−0.25−0.56−0.91−0.64−0.57
Trade bloc rupture−0.50−0.19−0.17−0.19−0.45−0.43−0.45−0.44−0.61
Hybrid coercion−0.22−0.48−0.48·−0.53−0.55·−0.20−0.20
Breadbasket failure−0.11−0.26−0.09−0.24−0.23−0.25−0.27−0.20−0.23
Regional war spillover−0.11−0.26−0.24−0.10−0.10−0.25−0.23−0.20−0.26
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Colombia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+20.925.34.44059Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.2 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+7.020.813.93646Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.2 · Nascent
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+6.511.34.85229Energy Infrastructure 9.6 · Transitional
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed+5.730.224.54253Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.2 · Foundational
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+2.221.219.05061Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 9.3 · Transitional
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−2.412.114.541120Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.2 · Foundational
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−8.18.616.72582Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Mixed−9.99.619.51966Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Loser−21.410.231.649172Intelligence & Assessment 9.2 · Transitional
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−37.49.046.434170Energy Technologies 3.6 · Nascent

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Colombia, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability11.4 Transitional → Foundational1.3% Possible · rank 136Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8
Breakdown of state function11.3 Transitional → Foundational0.9% Unlikely · rank 179Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8
Broad fall in financial strength10.9 Transitional → Foundational0.9% Unlikely · rank 127Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×3.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8
Broad fall in governance and integrity10.8 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 171Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8
Breakdown of information trust9.5 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 116Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8
Health system failure11.0 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 138Trade bloc rupture Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.2
Rule of law failure10.7 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Unlikely · rank 176Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8
Loss of industrial capacity10.0 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 118Global funding seizure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.5National Resilience & Crisis Management 10.8
Strategic awareness failure6.4 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 81Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 2.3
Rupture in trade and supply9.9 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 161Breadbasket failure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.9National Resilience & Crisis Management 10.8
Broad fall in information and influence9.4 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 112Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.1Artificial Intelligence 5.3
Food and water failure10.7 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 146Breadbasket failure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.9National Resilience & Crisis Management 10.8
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure10.3 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 110Hybrid coercion Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.1National Resilience & Crisis Management 10.8
Broad fall in trade and investment10.0 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 158Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.9National Resilience & Crisis Management 10.8
Broad fall in production and innovation9.4 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 134Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.9National Resilience & Crisis Management 10.8
Defence readiness failure9.8 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 84Hybrid coercion Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×3.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8
Diplomatic isolation9.5 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 151Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8
Broad fall in human capital10.4 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 152Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.5Artificial Intelligence 5.3
Education pipeline failure11.2 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 161Core disaster Extreme + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×3.7National Resilience & Crisis Management 10.8
Broad fall in national security7.1 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 84Hybrid coercion Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×3.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8
Collapse in energy security8.4 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 126Hybrid coercion Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.8National Resilience & Crisis Management 10.8
Failure of digital lifelines9.2 Transitional → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 111Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.1Quantum Technologies 2.3
Broad fall in critical technology3.5 Nascent → Inception— Remote · rank 63AI labour shock Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.2
Loss of advanced technology base2.3 Inception— No route · rank 62Already at the foot of the scale×4.2—
Loss of strategic deterrence2.4 Inception— No route · rank 61Already at the foot of the scale×6.2—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology9.4 Transitional → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 59Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Major×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.2
Capable digital government10.8 Transitional → Established0.4% Unlikely · rank 64Public service leap Severe + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.2
Trusted public institutions10.3 Transitional → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 60Public service leap Severe + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.2
Broad rise in governance and integrity10.8 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 69Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.2
Broad rise in critical technology3.5 Nascent— No route · rank 62No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×3.0—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure10.3 Transitional— No route · rank 67No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.6—
Broad rise in national security7.1 Foundational— No route · rank 56No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.9—
Broad rise in human capital10.4 Transitional— No route · rank 63No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×3.0—
Broad rise in information and influence9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 58No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.4—
Broad rise in financial strength10.9 Transitional— No route · rank 60No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×2.8—
Broad rise in production and innovation9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 60No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.0—
Broad rise in trade and investment10.0 Transitional— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×3.0—
Assured space services3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 56No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.5—
Frontier AI and compute3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 62No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.3—
Higher-value manufacturing6.8 Foundational— No route · rank 59No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.0—
Reliable low-cost energy6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 81No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.8—
Secure food and water supply10.7 Transitional— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
More deployable joint force9.3 Transitional— No route · rank 56No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.9—
Adaptable skilled workforce9.7 Transitional— No route · rank 62No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.8—
Stronger information environment9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 57No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.0—
Wider international influence9.5 Transitional— No route · rank 63No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.0—
Deeper long-term finance10.7 Transitional— No route · rank 58No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.8—
Research translated into value8.6 Foundational— No route · rank 64No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.0—
Higher-value international business10.1 Transitional— No route · rank 75No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×2.8—
Sophisticated export strength10.1 Transitional— No route · rank 60No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—