Latin America and Caribbean · CRI

Costa Rica

Baseline index 7.76Rank 70 of 197FoundationalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Low vulnerability, and gains from open markets and digital public services. One of 39 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
15.5
rank 130 of 197 · 3 years: 15.3
Worst case
−9.9%
Regional war spillover · tail −9.8%
Opportunity · 10 years
+3.7
rank 60 of 197 · 3 years: +3.9
Best case
+20
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed
34%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.19
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Energy Infrastructure
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; refugees hosted per head of population; internet users as a share of population; urban share of population; youth unemployment rate; adult obesity rate; share of exports going to china and the united states.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Costa Rica’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.74−0.77−1.02−0.46▼ 223Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.97−0.77−1.34−0.59▼ 426Energy Infrastructure 6.5 · Foundational
Severe pandemic S10High 0.75−0.75−1.15−0.51026Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.7 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.71−0.69−1.05−0.46025Artificial Intelligence 2.6 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.71−0.67−0.87−0.39019Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 1.4 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.54−0.53−0.79−0.35▼ 118Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.3 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.61−0.48−0.76−0.33017Economic Output & Productivity 7.4 · Foundational
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.68−0.48−0.85−0.38▲ 117Force Generation & Mobilisation 1.2 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.43−0.36−0.47−0.2107Maritime Power 1 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.28−0.28−0.44−0.19▲ 213Energy Infrastructure 7.6 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.45−1.07−0.71−0.41−0.41−1.03−0.96−0.83−1.06
Core disaster−0.04−1.16−0.33−0.92−0.41−1.04−1.11−0.95−0.95
Severe pandemic−0.80−0.40−0.29−0.97−0.85−0.91−0.85−0.84−0.84
AI labour shock−0.77−0.35·−0.93−0.82−0.96−0.82−0.80−0.80
Cryptographic trust break−0.88−0.48−0.75·−1.08−1.01−0.94−0.40−0.46
Trade bloc rupture−0.70−0.27−0.22−0.27−0.63−0.61−0.63−0.62−0.85
Global funding seizure−0.29−0.32·−0.32−0.29−0.65−1.05−0.74−0.66
Legitimacy rupture−0.28−0.31−0.50−0.28−0.66−0.92−0.75−0.28−0.32
Hybrid coercion−0.27−0.58−0.54·−0.65−0.67·−0.24−0.24
Breadbasket failure−0.15−0.35−0.11−0.33−0.31−0.33−0.36−0.27−0.31
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Costa Rica is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+19.924.34.43561Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.2 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+17.819.51.72651Energy Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+7.012.55.53479Intelligence & Assessment 4.3 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+6.918.411.53547Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.6 · Nascent
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+6.122.716.64652Energy Infrastructure 8.1 · Foundational
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed+4.228.524.33656Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.2 · Nascent
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+3.18.75.64960Energy Infrastructure 8.1 · Foundational
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−5.39.614.934128Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.2 · Nascent
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−5.513.719.22768Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.3 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Mixed−7.110.517.52059Robotics & Autonomous Systems 2.3 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Costa Rica, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability10.0 Transitional → Foundational2.3% Possible · rank 73Global funding seizure Major + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.4Financial System Depth & Access 9
Breakdown of state function12.6 Established → Transitional1.9% Possible · rank 134Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.2
Broad fall in financial strength9.3 Transitional → Nascent1.4% Possible · rank 73Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.7Financial System Depth & Access 9
Rupture in trade and supply9.2 Transitional → Foundational1.3% Possible · rank 54Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 2
Broad fall in governance and integrity12.3 Established → Transitional1.3% Possible · rank 100Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.3
Loss of industrial capacity9.0 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 31Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.9Financial System Depth & Access 9
Broad fall in trade and investment10.0 Transitional → Foundational0.6% Unlikely · rank 60Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.8Maritime Power 2
Breakdown of information trust8.5 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 86Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.3
Health system failure12.7 Established → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 117Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.2
Collapse in energy security4.5 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 69Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 2
Rule of law failure12.9 Established → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 142Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.3
Broad fall in production and innovation9.1 Transitional → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 53Global funding seizure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.2Financial System Depth & Access 9
Food and water failure9.9 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 79Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.4Financial System Depth & Access 9
Broad fall in information and influence6.2 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 95Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 1.3
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure8.2 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 92Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.6Financial System Depth & Access 9
Diplomatic isolation6.1 Foundational → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 110Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 1.3
Broad fall in human capital10.8 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 103Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.1Financial System Depth & Access 9
Failure of digital lifelines8.1 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 79Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 1.3
Education pipeline failure11.6 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 113Core disaster Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×3.3Financial System Depth & Access 9
Broad fall in critical technology2.5 Inception— No route · rank 72Already at the foot of the scale×3.4—
Broad fall in national security1.5 Inception— No route · rank 92Already at the foot of the scale×4.0—
Loss of advanced technology base1.7 Inception— No route · rank 72Already at the foot of the scale×3.7—
Defence readiness failure1.3 Inception— No route · rank 124Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.3 Inception— No route · rank 73Already at the foot of the scale×11—
Strategic awareness failure2.9 Inception— No route · rank 104Already at the foot of the scale×2.2—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology9.8 Transitional → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 63Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Major×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.2
Capable digital government10.7 Transitional → Established0.1% Remote · rank 72Public service leap Extreme + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.2
Trusted public institutions12.1 Established → Established0.1% Remote · rank 71Public service leap Extreme + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.7Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.6
Broad rise in governance and integrity12.3 Established → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 71Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.2
Reliable low-cost energy5.3 Nascent → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 64Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.6Energy Technologies 2.4
Broad rise in trade and investment10.0 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 67Market access opening Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.8Energy Infrastructure 8.1
Broad rise in critical technology2.5 Inception— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.2—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure8.2 Foundational— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.7—
Broad rise in national security1.5 Inception— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.3—
Broad rise in human capital10.8 Transitional— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.2—
Broad rise in information and influence6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.5—
Broad rise in financial strength9.3 Transitional— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.0—
Broad rise in production and innovation9.1 Transitional— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
Assured space services1.3 Inception— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.7—
Frontier AI and compute3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Higher-value manufacturing5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Secure food and water supply9.9 Transitional— No route · rank 78No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
More deployable joint force1.5 Inception— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.3—
Adaptable skilled workforce9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Stronger information environment6.3 Foundational— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.1—
Wider international influence6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Deeper long-term finance8.8 Foundational— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
Research translated into value8.0 Foundational— No route · rank 71No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Higher-value international business10.4 Transitional— No route · rank 78No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×2.6—
Sophisticated export strength10.4 Transitional— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.3—