Europe · CZE

Czechia

Baseline index 11.51Rank 32 of 197TransitionalEuropeAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
10.3
rank 161 of 197 · 3 years: 10.2
Worst case
−7.2%
Regional war spillover · tail −6.3%
Opportunity · 10 years
+20.1
rank 26 of 197 · 3 years: +20.3
Best case
+47
Clean power threshold · gainer in 6 of 10
Shock absorbed
45%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.12
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Hybrid coercion. Highest exposure indicators: no coastline; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; refugees hosted per head of population; share of population aged 65 and over; internet users as a share of population; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; adult obesity rate; little renewable water per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Czechia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.95−0.83−1.37−0.60▼ 216Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.86−0.70−1.33−0.58019Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8.4 · Foundational
AI labour shock S08High 0.80−0.64−1.18−0.52▼ 116Artificial Intelligence 7 · Foundational
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.85−0.64−1.07−0.47▼ 115Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 7.5 · Foundational
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.65−0.54−0.97−0.43016Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.7 · Nascent
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.73−0.44−0.80−0.35011Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.58−0.37−0.72−0.3209Economic Output & Productivity 11.1 · Transitional
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.36−0.30−0.56−0.24▼ 19Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 9.4 · Transitional
Core disaster S07Medium 0.43−0.29−0.60−0.2607Trade Facilitation & Logistics 10.9 · Transitional
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.41−0.27−0.53−0.23▲ 18Force Generation & Mobilisation 9.7 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.47−1.12−0.91−0.43−0.43−1.08−1.01−0.86−1.11
Severe pandemic−0.75−0.37−0.31−0.91−0.79−0.85−0.79−0.78−0.78
AI labour shock−0.71−0.32·−0.86−0.75−0.88−0.75−0.73−0.73
Cryptographic trust break−0.83−0.46−0.81·−1.01−0.95−0.89−0.38−0.43
Trade bloc rupture−0.71−0.27−0.25−0.27−0.64−0.62−0.64−0.63−0.86
Hybrid coercion−0.34−0.73−0.66·−0.81−0.84·−0.30−0.30
Global funding seizure−0.22−0.24·−0.25−0.22−0.50−0.81−0.57−0.51
Breadbasket failure−0.16−0.38−0.13−0.35−0.34−0.36−0.39−0.29−0.33
Core disaster−0.02−0.44−0.14−0.35−0.16−0.39−0.42−0.36−0.36
Legitimacy rupture−0.16−0.17−0.32−0.16−0.37−0.51−0.42−0.16−0.18
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Czechia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+47.047.30.35114Energy Technologies 8 · Foundational
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+44.846.61.85622Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8 · Transitional
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+29.430.41.05718Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 10 · Transitional
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+20.545.925.45729Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8 · Transitional
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Gainer+18.837.018.24325Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.8 · Foundational
Great-power détente S13 ↗Gainer+11.122.911.84725Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.8 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+9.814.74.95432Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 9 · Transitional
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+9.330.721.46139Trade Facilitation & Logistics 11.5 · Transitional
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+5.914.38.45670Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8 · Transitional
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−6.02.18.164172Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 12 · Established

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Czechia, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function13.9 Established → Transitional3.1% Possible · rank 76Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.3Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 9.7
Broad fall in governance and integrity13.5 Established → Transitional1.5% Possible · rank 85Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.8Maritime Power 0.5
Strategic awareness failure9.4 Transitional → Foundational1.4% Possible · rank 31Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Quantum Technologies 6.3
Collapse in energy security10.0 Transitional → Foundational1.2% Possible · rank 25Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 0.5
Broad fall in financial strength12.8 Established → Transitional1.1% Possible · rank 99Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.0Maritime Power 0.5
Loss of financial stability13.5 Established → Transitional1.0% Possible · rank 153Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.8Maritime Power 0.5
Rupture in trade and supply12.1 Established → Foundational1.0% Possible · rank 86Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.0Maritime Power 0.5
Breakdown of information trust12.0 Transitional → Foundational1.0% Unlikely · rank 50Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.0Quantum Technologies 6.3
Broad fall in information and influence10.9 Transitional → Foundational0.9% Unlikely · rank 35Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.0Quantum Technologies 6.3
Health system failure13.5 Established → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 64Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Diplomatic isolation11.3 Transitional → Foundational0.8% Unlikely · rank 43Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.0Quantum Technologies 6.3
Rule of law failure13.1 Established → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 86Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.0Quantum Technologies 6.3
Broad fall in trade and investment12.7 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 47Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 0.5
Failure of digital lifelines11.8 Transitional → Foundational0.7% Unlikely · rank 22Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.0Quantum Technologies 6.3
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure12.1 Established → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 38Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 0.5
Loss of industrial capacity13.0 Established → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 54Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Broad fall in critical technology8.0 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 11Trade bloc rupture Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.6Quantum Technologies 6.3
Broad fall in national security7.4 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 45Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×3.3Maritime Power 0.5
Broad fall in production and innovation12.6 Established → Transitional0.3% Unlikely · rank 69Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Broad fall in human capital13.7 Established → Transitional0.2% Unlikely · rank 46Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Loss of advanced technology base7.1 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 17Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×3.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 9.4
Education pipeline failure14.6 Established → Transitional0.2% Remote · rank 33Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Food and water failure12.6 Established → Transitional0.2% Remote · rank 144Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.5Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 9.7
Loss of strategic deterrence3.8 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 15Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.5Maritime Power 0.5
Defence readiness failure7.7 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 100Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.9Maritime Power 0.5
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology12.3 Established → Established7.6% Likely · rank 24Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Frontier AI and compute7.6 Foundational → Transitional5.1% Likely · rank 25Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.4Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.8
Capable digital government13.4 Established → Advanced5.0% Likely · rank 27Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Trusted public institutions13.0 Established → Established4.6% Possible · rank 26Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Reliable low-cost energy10.4 Transitional → Established4.4% Possible · rank 21Market access opening Major + Clean power threshold Severe×1.1Energy Technologies 8
Broad rise in governance and integrity13.5 Established → Advanced4.1% Possible · rank 26Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Broad rise in critical technology8.0 Foundational → Transitional3.7% Possible · rank 24Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.8Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.8
Broad rise in trade and investment12.7 Established → Established2.6% Possible · rank 24Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Research translated into value12.6 Established → Established2.5% Possible · rank 24Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.6Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.8
Broad rise in human capital13.7 Established → Advanced2.3% Possible · rank 25Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Higher-value international business12.6 Established → Established2.1% Possible · rank 23Market access opening Major + Clean power threshold Extreme×1.9Energy Technologies 8
Higher-value manufacturing11.4 Transitional → Established2.0% Possible · rank 24Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.8Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.8
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure12.1 Established → Established1.9% Possible · rank 23Clean power threshold Extreme + Automated discovery step Major×1.8Energy Technologies 8
Broad rise in production and innovation12.6 Established → Established1.8% Possible · rank 24Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.6Energy Technologies 8
Sophisticated export strength13.6 Established → Advanced1.7% Possible · rank 26Great-power détente Major + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.1Energy Technologies 8
Broad rise in financial strength12.8 Established → Established1.0% Unlikely · rank 22Clean power threshold Severe + Chronic disease advance Severe×1.8Energy Technologies 8
Secure food and water supply12.6 Established → Established0.9% Unlikely · rank 27Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Deeper long-term finance12.0 Established → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 21Clean power threshold Extreme + Automated discovery step Major×1.7Energy Technologies 8
Broad rise in information and influence10.9 Transitional → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 24Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Stronger information environment10.4 Transitional → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 27Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Adaptable skilled workforce13.1 Established → Established0.7% Unlikely · rank 29Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Assured space services6.4 Foundational → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 23Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8
Wider international influence11.3 Transitional → Established0.2% Unlikely · rank 30Great-power détente Major + Middle East settlement Extreme×2.0Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 10
Broad rise in national security7.4 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 28Middle East settlement Extreme + Automated discovery step Extreme×2.7Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.8
More deployable joint force7.8 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 27Middle East settlement Extreme + Automated discovery step Extreme×2.7Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.8