Africa · COD

DR Congo

Baseline index 2.87Rank 175 of 197InceptionAfricaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile and exposed. Highly vulnerable importers of fuel, finance and food. One of 35 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
46.5
rank 27 of 197 · 3 years: 46.4
Worst case
−31.5%
Legitimacy rupture · tail −29.8%
Opportunity · 10 years
−15.7
rank 168 of 197 · 3 years: −15.4
Best case
+3
Water-efficient food leap · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
12%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.30
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Trade bloc rupture, Breadbasket failure, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: share of exports going to china and the united states; land borders with states in conflict or collapse; share of population aged under 15; low real gdp per head; industry as a share of gdp; consumer price inflation; low life expectancy at birth; few months of imports covered by reserves.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in DR Congo’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.84−0.90−1.03−0.46▼ 224Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0.5 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.75−0.88−1.00−0.45▼ 622Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.64−0.78−0.90−0.39▲ 125Financial System Depth & Access 1.1 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.57−0.72−0.82−0.36020Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.1 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.48−0.65−0.74−0.32▲ 322Population Health 2.1 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.60−0.64−0.73−0.32020Labour & Employment 0.9 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03Medium 0.53−0.64−0.74−0.33▲ 422Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08Medium 0.41−0.50−0.56−0.25▲ 417Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09Medium 0.43−0.47−0.50−0.22▲ 411Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Low 0.27−0.25−0.29−0.13▲ 46Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.4 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Legitimacy rupture−0.23−0.61−1.02−0.55−1.29−1.79−1.47−0.55−0.63
Trade bloc rupture−0.40−0.50−0.45−0.50−1.16−1.11−1.16−1.13−1.56
Core disaster−0.04−1.17−0.38−0.93−0.42−1.05−1.12−0.96−0.96
Severe pandemic−0.36−0.41−0.34−1.00−0.87−0.94−0.87−0.86−0.86
Breadbasket failure−0.19−0.83−0.29−0.78−0.74−0.80−0.85−0.64−0.73
Global funding seizure−0.18−0.44·−0.44−0.40−0.89−1.46−1.02−0.91
Regional war spillover−0.20−0.89−0.75−0.34−0.34−0.85−0.80−0.68−0.88
AI labour shock−0.23−0.27·−0.73−0.64−0.75−0.64−0.63−0.63
Cryptographic trust break−0.26−0.36−0.67·−0.81−0.76−0.71−0.30−0.35
Hybrid coercion−0.11−0.43−0.43·−0.47−0.49·−0.18−0.18
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what DR Congo is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+2.87.04.21288Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+0.89.18.41589Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 2.5 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−0.29.49.717124Intelligence & Assessment 3 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed−0.27.27.411132Energy Technologies 1 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed−1.13.34.41283Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed−9.76.416.112183Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−19.39.328.710178Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−24.84.929.78172Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−38.611.149.714193Digital & Services Trade 2.3 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−45.71.246.94195Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for DR Congo, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability3.4 Nascent → Inception2.7% Possible · rank 52Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severe×1.8Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 2.5
Breakdown of state function3.9 Nascent → Inception1.2% Possible · rank 168Legitimacy rupture Extreme×1.6Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 2.5
Broad fall in financial strength3.2 Nascent → Inception1.0% Unlikely · rank 118Global funding seizure Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Major×2.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 2.2
Broad fall in governance and integrity3.4 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 154Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×1.7Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 2.5
Rule of law failure3.2 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 85Global funding seizure Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×1.6Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 2.5
Health system failure3.7 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 120Trade bloc rupture Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.6
Rupture in trade and supply3.8 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 132Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 1.5
Food and water failure3.6 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 97Breadbasket failure Extreme + Core disaster Majorplans fail×2.4Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 2.2
Broad fall in trade and investment3.2 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 118Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Severe pandemic Severe×1.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 2.2
Breakdown of information trust3.5 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 157Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×1.6Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 2.5
Education pipeline failure4.0 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 150Breadbasket failure Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.6
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure4.0 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 163Breadbasket failure Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.6Financial System Depth & Access 2.8
Broad fall in information and influence3.6 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 155Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.3Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 2.5
Diplomatic isolation3.4 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 164Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.3Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 2.2
Broad fall in critical technology0.4 Inception— No route · rank 175Already at the foot of the scale×7.5—
Broad fall in national security1.9 Inception— No route · rank 176Already at the foot of the scale×3.0—
Broad fall in human capital3.4 Nascent → Inception— Remote · rank 186Core disaster Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.6
Broad fall in production and innovation2.7 Inception— No route · rank 175Already at the foot of the scale×2.6—
Loss of advanced technology base0.1 Inception— No route · rank 175Already at the foot of the scale×41—
Collapse in energy security4.0 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 3.0 of 3×2.6—
Failure of digital lifelines3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 2.1 of 3×4.5—
Defence readiness failure2.9 Inception— No route · rank 179Already at the foot of the scale×2.2—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.4 Inception— No route · rank 175Already at the foot of the scale×6.7—
Strategic awareness failure1.4 Inception— No route · rank 176Already at the foot of the scale×3.7—
Loss of industrial capacity3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 3.0 of 3×2.7—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.4 Inception— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.8—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure4.0 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.5—
Broad rise in national security1.9 Inception— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.7—
Broad rise in human capital3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×8.1—
Broad rise in information and influence3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.0—
Broad rise in governance and integrity3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.6—
Broad rise in financial strength3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.2—
Broad rise in production and innovation2.7 Inception— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.0—
Broad rise in trade and investment3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×5.7—
Assured space services0.5 Inception— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Higher-value manufacturing1.6 Inception— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Reliable low-cost energy2.4 Inception— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.9—
Secure food and water supply3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.1—
More deployable joint force2.4 Inception— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×11—
Adaptable skilled workforce2.5 Inception— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.2—
Stronger health and biotechnology3.0 Inception— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.4—
Stronger information environment3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×11—
Wider international influence3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.4—
Capable digital government3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Trusted public institutions3.0 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Deeper long-term finance3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×8.6—
Research translated into value2.2 Inception— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.0—
Higher-value international business2.6 Inception— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×5.4—
Sophisticated export strength3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 175No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.8—